Hello,
I'm trying to install failover multi instances of postfix on a 2
machines Centos 6, with postfix 2.6, corosync and pacemaker and use of
virtual IP.
No SElinux enable.
Each instance use a virtual IP, and each virtual IP comes from
pacemaker. So only one machine have vip.
In my
Thank you Rendl and Muzzaffer.
Well I did some things in Plesk and restarted the server and it works now.
And yes I understand what you mean now. Thank you very much.
Tracy
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 18.01.2013 06:13, schrieb Tracy
On 2013-01-17 Muzaffer wrote:
On 17 January 2013 18:40, Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net wrote:
On 2013-01-17 Muzaffer wrote:
I've just found out a virtual file in the format u...@example.com
example doesn't work with virtual_alias_domains. Guess I need to
find another solution.
Am 18.01.2013 11:17, schrieb Adri van Loopik:
Hallo,
As an amateur I am playing with configuring email on a Linux box (Ubuntu
12.04 LTS Server).
I was able to send mail DIRECTLY to the internet, but of course I ran into
the problem of spamhouse etc. So it
seems clear that I
FIRST:
DO NOT REPLY OFF-LIST AND DO NOT REPLY IN HTML
ON MAILING-LISTS!
Am 18.01.2013 11:39, schrieb Adri van Loopik:
what about the manual?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relayhost
what else should postfix do if you only say relay to host xyz?
The next-hop
I read that warning, but wasn't sure I understood it properly. I know that
setting destination recipient limit to anything above one defines a
destination as a domain, so by setting it to 2 we're saying wait 1s
between every delivery to a Yahoo domain,
right? And if every message sent is
Hello Wietse -
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Alexander Farber:
HOWEVER, there is one problem that you need to be aware of. If your
machine forwards SPAM to gmail, then gmail will decide that your
server is a spammer. Gmail may then file good mail
I read that warning, but wasn't sure I understood it properly. I
know that setting destination recipient limit to anything above
one defines a destination as a domain, so by setting it to 2
we're saying wait 1s between every delivery to a Yahoo domain,
As for what settings work better with
Test milis, abaikan..
--
WUP
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: postfix-users+unsubscr...@id.postfix.org
For additional commands, e-mail: postfix-users+h...@id.postfix.org
Adri van Loopik:
use a relayhost. This works perfectly, the Linux box can send mail
indirectly - via the smtp server provided by my ISP - to internet
addresses.
But when relayhost is defined, mail to other hosts on my LAN does not go
through.
relayhost, as documented, sends mail that
sip
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Wijatmoko U. Prayitno
k...@profitlook.com wrote:
Test milis, abaikan..
--
WUP
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: postfix-users+unsubscr...@id.postfix.org
For additional commands, e-mail: postfix-users+h...@id.postfix.org
--
http://mafatahna.web.id |
On 1/18/2013 7:06 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
I read that warning, but wasn't sure I understood it properly. I
know that setting destination recipient limit to anything above
one defines a destination as a domain, so by setting it to 2
we're saying wait 1s between every delivery to a Yahoo
--On Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:17 PM -0600 Noel Jones
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 1/17/2013 4:42 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
With testing, I have the following for 465/submission. Thanks again
for the pointers! I used reject_unauth_destination because with
just reject, some of
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
As for what settings work better with high-volume receivers, I
suggest a search query for aol postmaster, yahoo postmaster etc.
Agreed - but Yahoo is really the only one we're having issues with (even
after complying
On 18 January 2013 12:15, Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net wrote:
On 2013-01-17 Muzaffer wrote:
On 17 January 2013 18:40, Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net
wrote:
On 2013-01-17 Muzaffer wrote:
I've just found out a virtual file in the format u...@example.com
example doesn't
Am 18.01.2013 18:49, schrieb Steve Jenkins:
Agreed - but Yahoo is really the only one we're having issues with (even
after complying with all their guidelines here)
last time i had to do this , yahoo needs 3 weeks for whitelisting
the new ip, used for a mail list server
at the end if you
On 17 January 2013 08:55, Timo Röhling timo.roehl...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 17.01.2013 06:20, schrieb Muzaffer:
Jan 17 06:14:20 ommuse postfix/smtp[25504]: BC05AF629A:
to=sertacona...@gmail.com mailto:sertacona...@gmail.com, relay=none,
delay=116212, delays=116107/0.02/105/0, dsn=4.4.1,
On 18 January 2013 11:11, Tracy Wise wiseag...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Rendl and Muzzaffer.
Well I did some things in Plesk and restarted the server and it works now.
And yes I understand what you mean now. Thank you very much.
Sure thing, It would be nice to share what you did with
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:57:37AM +0100, Olivier Brousselle wrote:
Each instance is marked as disable, there is a script to activate
instances (postmulti -i postfix-mta -e enable ; postmulti -i
postfix-mta -e start) for using with pacemaker.
That is:
# Turn it on for postmulti start
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:49:34AM -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Agreed - but Yahoo is really the only one we're having issues with (even
after complying with all their guidelines here):
http://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?page=contenty=PROD_MAIL_MLlocale=en_USid=SLN3435
Yes, they are willing to
Thanks a lot Wietse,
for Postfix
and also for this very helpful reaction and good advice. It has
worked, though not immediately.
I had first also to put smtp_host_lookup on 'native, dns' (I did the
same for lmtp_host_lookup, not sure that was needed).
Everything started to go really well
Thanks, I'm in the process of testing those suggested applications!
On Jan 17, 2013, at 7:07 AM, DTNX Postmaster postmas...@dtnx.net wrote:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 09:25, Jamie Griffin wrote:
* Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk [2013-01-17 04:25:04 +]:
On 16/01/13 22:20, Erwan David wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:12:31PM +0100, Adri van Loopik wrote:
I had first also to put smtp_host_lookup on 'native, dns' (I did the
same for lmtp_host_lookup, not sure that was needed).
The real issue was that you failed to use the correct relayhost
syntax:
relayhost =
My Problem:
I have a vanilla Zimbra setup that I have been trying to implement either
Before Queue Mail filtering or Milter Based Filtering.
At first I tried doing a Pre-queue setup with amavisd-new but I ran into the
problem where aliasing wouldn't work. I tried again after much testing
On 1/18/2013 3:56 PM, Amir A. wrote:
My Problem:
I have a vanilla Zimbra setup that I have been trying to implement
either Before Queue Mail filtering or Milter Based Filtering.
At first I tried doing a Pre-queue setup with amavisd-new but I ran
into the problem where aliasing wouldn't work.
When I mean it doesn't work is that anytime I use any sort of aliases (domain
-- domain via Zimbra's GUI) or a simple forwarder (userdne ---
userexists in /etc/aliases) it never works with a milter however sending to the
original/real addresses always works.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
Yes, they are willing to cripple SMTP and expect everyone to cope,
because they are too big to ignore. :-)
Sad, but true.
At that point you may not even need rate delays, just set a modest
concurrency,
On 1/18/2013 4:51 PM, Amir A. wrote:
When I mean it doesn't work is that anytime I use any sort of
aliases (domain -- domain via Zimbra's GUI) or a simple forwarder
(userdne --- userexists in /etc/aliases) it never works with
a milter however sending to the original/real addresses always
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:46:45PM -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
At that point you may not even need rate delays, just set a modest
concurrency, and typical SMTP transaction latency of 0.2-0.5s (
with spam checks, RBL lookups, ...) will give you at most 2-5
messages per unit concurrency per
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:51:06PM -0500, Amir A. wrote:
Jan 17 11:49:02 zimbra postfix/smtpd[26986]: NOQUEUE:
milter-reject: RCPT from mail-ie0-f175.google.com[209.85.223.175]:
550 5.1.1 User unknown; from=aho...@hotmail.com
to=a...@zimbra.koala.somedomain.com
proto=ESMTP
30 matches
Mail list logo
