Re: Mail server, what else?

2013-07-13 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2013-07-12 Fri 11:55 AM |, J Gao wrote: Now I would like your advises on my system so I can improve it more. - Postfix 2.6.6 Old. - Courier(Support virtual domain) Dovecot instead of Courier? - Mailman maillist Look at mlmmj instead of Mailman - no web interface needed.

Re: Mail server, what else?

2013-07-13 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 13.07.2013 20:11, schrieb Craig R. Skinner: I appreciate if you can give me advise so I can further improve my system. No Apache, PHP or webmail. HTTP was designed to transfer hyperlinked text files, not do dynmaic stuff with root access to the whole box. Beware! in case of root

Re: Mail server, what else?

2013-07-13 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2013-07-13 Sat 20:50 PM |, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: but what has the protocol HTTP to do with the underlying application? OK then, shove every frigging thing down port 80's throat. Why bother with Postfix, IMAP, ftp, ssh, ping, traceroute, Just have 1 port on the box that does it

Re: Mail server, what else?

2013-07-13 Thread Peter
On 07/13/2013 11:15 AM, J Gao wrote: http://vault.centos.org/6.4/os/Source/SPackages/postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.src.rpm And patched with quota patch. That's brilliant, now you can't get support for it anywhere. You don't need to patch postfix to get quotas, dovecot 2 has a policy daemon that

Virtual Aliases + check_policy_service

2013-07-13 Thread Cassidy Larson
I'm trying to get check_policy_service working right by returning an error on a full mailbox to avoid back scatter. The check_policy_service works fine, except when it comes to virtual alias mappings. When running the check_policy_service on the virtual alias user my smtpd_recipient_restrictions

Re: Virtual Aliases + check_policy_service

2013-07-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Cassidy Larson: I'm trying to get check_policy_service working right by returning an error on a full mailbox to avoid back scatter. The check_policy_service works fine, except when it comes to virtual alias mappings. When running the check_policy_service on the virtual alias user my

Re: Virtual Aliases + check_policy_service

2013-07-13 Thread Cassidy Larson
Figured it out. Returning a DUNNO from the policy service for valid under-quota and unknown users causes postfix to proceed to the checking of aliases/users. This allows the mailbox over-quota rejection to work successfully for valid users, and allows virtual aliases to be accepted while denying

Delivery Retry

2013-07-13 Thread Roman Gelfand
What setting determines how long postfix should attempt to deliver an email if target server is not available? Will this setting work with smart host configuration where smart host is temporarily unavailable? Thanks in advance