Hello Everybody,
I need to migrate my old postfix server to a new machine.
Domain will be the same. I would like to make this migration seamless
for the end users and give them 1-2 months for migration (both servers
should work at that time correctly).
My current deployment is the following:
-
asbaeza:
Hi
I am getting some problems with my postfix installation. I use
postfix+amavis+clamav+spamassassin in a Debian box.
I recently changed from sendmail+canit pro to this configuration.
The last error I get is something like:
Command time limit exceeded: procmail
On 10/12/2013 07:34 AM, asbaeza wrote:
Hi
I am getting some problems with my postfix installation. I use
postfix+amavis+clamav+spamassassin in a Debian box.
I recently changed from sendmail+canit pro to this configuration.
The last error I get is something like:
Command time
On 10/12/2013 09:54 AM, teknet9 wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I need to migrate my old postfix server to a new machine.
Domain will be the same. I would like to make this migration seamless
for the end users and give them 1-2 months for migration (both servers
should work at that time correctly).
1
Hello Jeroen,
Thank you for advise.
I have many users i can not allow for any downtime (not even few seconds).
Also i can not loose any single email.
Your solution will not guarantee that.
I am looking for true HA solution.
That is why both servers needs to work at the same time for 1-2 months
Am 12.10.2013 17:04, schrieb teknet9:
I have many users i can not allow for any downtime (not even few seconds)
says who?
not even a few seconds is unrealistic even at normal operations
e-mail is not a real-time messenger
Also i can not loose any single email
why should you?
you most
El sáb, 12-10-2013 a las 15:59 +0200, Jeroen Geilman escribió:
On 10/12/2013 07:34 AM, asbaeza wrote:
Hi
I am getting some problems with my postfix installation. I use
postfix+amavis+clamav+spamassassin in a Debian box.
I recently changed from sendmail+canit pro to this configuration.
El sáb, 12-10-2013 a las 08:13 -0400, Wietse Venema escribió:
asbaeza:
Hi
I am getting some problems with my postfix installation. I use
postfix+amavis+clamav+spamassassin in a Debian box.
I recently changed from sendmail+canit pro to this configuration.
The last error I get
On Oct 12, 2013, at 17:04, teknet9 tekn...@o2.pl wrote:
Thank you for advise.
I have many users i can not allow for any downtime (not even few seconds).
Also i can not loose any single email.
Your solution will not guarantee that.
I am looking for true HA solution.
That is why both
On 10/12/2013 07:16 PM, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
On Oct 12, 2013, at 17:04, teknet9 tekn...@o2.pl wrote:
Thank you for advise.
I have many users i can not allow for any downtime (not even few seconds).
Also i can not loose any single email.
Your solution will not guarantee that.
I am looking
Hello All,
My system is fairly high-end. 15TB bandwidth, 8 core cpu and 16G RAM,
centos 64bit, postfix 2.6.6. I've been running postfix successfully for
almost 6 months now but recently i've noticed that the mails are spending
lot of time outside queue. There has been no change in hardware or
Here is my postconf -n output:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
connection_cache_ttl_limit = 300s
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
data_directory = /var/lib/postfix
On Oct 12, 2013, at 19:39, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 10/12/2013 07:16 PM, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
On Oct 12, 2013, at 17:04, teknet9 tekn...@o2.pl wrote:
Thank you for advise.
I have many users i can not allow for any downtime (not even few seconds).
Also i can not loose any
boson code:
Hello All,
My system is fairly high-end. 15TB bandwidth, 8 core cpu and 16G RAM,
centos 64bit, postfix 2.6.6. I've been running postfix successfully for
almost 6 months now but recently i've noticed that the mails are spending
lot of time outside queue. There has been no change
Wietse,
Thank you for adding if-endif to header and body checks. A report on
About.com states that in 2010 there were about 294 billion emails sent per
day, 90% of which were spam. With numbers like that, trying to go through
and blacklist individual IP addresses or users is a waste of time.
Looking through the logs, I have noticed an attempt to send out mail
which temporary local fails. I did a dig mx and noticed there is no
mx record. I then tried to connect to the email address domain
portion of the name. Sure enough, I was able to connect.
Is this legitimate configuration of
On 10/12/2013 10:19 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
Looking through the logs, I have noticed an attempt to send out mail
which temporary local fails. I did a dig mx and noticed there is no
mx record. I then tried to connect to the email address domain
portion of the name. Sure enough, I was able
but I am geting the following message
said: 451 Temporary local problem - please try later (in reply to
RCPT TO command))
it is stuck forever in a queue until it fails. Is there a setting I
need to set so it should be accepted.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Noel Jones
sorry about this. I guess it has nothing to do with mx records. It
is the remote server telling me their server is not able to accept
mail.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote:
but I am geting the following message
said: 451 Temporary local problem -
On 10/13/2013 05:10 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote:
said: 451 Temporary local problem - please try later (in reply to
RCPT TO command))
sorry about this. I guess it has nothing to do with mx records. It
is the remote
Sounds like you're trying to send email to a host that is possibly
greylisting.
On 13.10.2013 00:10, Roman Gelfand wrote:
sorry about this. I guess it has nothing to do with mx records. It
is the remote server telling me their server is not able to accept
mail.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:04
21 matches
Mail list logo
