On 2024-04-11 at 05:10:45 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:10:45 +0200)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
>> Στις 11/4/24 10:59, ο/η Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users έγραψε:
>>> It still works, but you may need supplementary software as amavis, sagator,
>>>
On 2024-04-11 at 03:41:37 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:41:37 +0800)
Mr. Peng via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Thanks for all the help.
BTW, is spamassassin still a popular option for antispam today? or
should I
use rspamd instead?
SpamAssassin is still pretty popular and we
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:39:24PM -0400, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
> > On Apr 2, 2024, at 10:52, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:14:29AM -0400, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> >> Hey there all,
> >>
> >> I’m setting up a
Στις 11/4/24 10:59, ο/η Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users έγραψε:
It still works, but you may need supplementary software as amavis,
sagator, spamass-milter or mimedefang because SpamAssassin only
focuses on classification, not about delivery.
On 11.04.24 11:54, Dimitris via
Στις 11/4/24 10:59, ο/η Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users έγραψε:
It still works, but you may need supplementary software as amavis,
sagator, spamass-milter or mimedefang because SpamAssassin only focuses
on classification, not about delivery.
iirc, you also need a compiler
On 11.04.24 15:41, Mr. Peng via Postfix-users wrote:
BTW, is spamassassin still a popular option for antispam today? or should I
use rspamd instead?
It still works, but you may need supplementary software as amavis, sagator,
spamass-milter or mimedefang because SpamAssassin only focuses on
Thanks for all the help.
BTW, is spamassassin still a popular option for antispam today? or should I
use rspamd instead?
Regards.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:23 PM Bill Cole via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On 2024-04-10 at 05:46:36 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:46:36
On 10.04.24 17:46, Mr. Peng via Postfix-users wrote:
I have been using spamhaus, spamcop, sorbs as the RBL providers for
antispam.
But some of the customers speak to me about the FP issues caused by RBL.
Do you think the three RBL above are reliable in a practical system?
On 10/04/24 22:50,
Am 2024-04-11 05:39, schrieb Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users:
I guess I missed something. — I also want it to null route (or route to
a maildir) all *outbound* mail — so we can examine what our ticket
system *would* send, is there something in here to do that, or is the
above only for inbound?
