[pfx] Mail text wrapping

2024-04-22 Thread Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
This is probably not the right place to be asking this as it is not directly Postfix related, but I don't know a better group to ask. For years I have sent text messages and just let the lines run on. Only inserting a \n for the start of a new paragraph. I never exceed the 988 line length

[pfx] IMPORTANT, drop "resolve [!UNAVAIL=return]" from Linux nsswitch.conf files

2024-04-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
The isi.edu DNS nameservers were apparently being DoSed today, and reverse and forward lookups (from my MX host) were failing. I was however surprised to then see: postfix/smtpd[2530673]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[128.9.29.254]: 550 5.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find

[pfx] Re: status=deferred (bounce or trace service failure)

2024-04-22 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:21:01AM -0400, 785 243 via Postfix-users wrote: > > > Recently i'm seeing a few messages deferred with status=deferred > > (bounce or trace service failure) > > > > instead of status=deferred (host .. said: 450 ...) > > > > from

[pfx] Re: status=deferred (bounce or trace service failure)

2024-04-22 Thread 785 243 via Postfix-users
I discovered I had bounce set to discard I don't recall why, it's been that way for years. Maybe to suppress backscatter. After i set it back to bounce' i got the expected 550 reject On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:09 AM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:21:01AM

[pfx] Re: status=deferred (bounce or trace service failure)

2024-04-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:21:01AM -0400, 785 243 via Postfix-users wrote: > Recently i'm seeing a few messages deferred with status=deferred > (bounce or trace service failure) > > instead of status=deferred (host .. said: 450 ...) > > from the logs: > > postfix/smtp[272605]: warning: