On Fri, 17 May 2019 16:37:26 +0200
Christian Rößner wrote:
> a little bit hard to figure out your problem. I only can guess.
I was using 'dig txt chez-vrolet.net' and not turning up the correct
TXT records, and should have used 'dig txt
201905._domainkey.chez-vrolet.net' instead. Oops. =D
On Thu, 16 May 2019 22:28:59 -0700
Dennis Carr wrote:
> I'm working to implent DKIM and DMARC at this time (DMARC is next),
> and I've got DKIM just about down except for one thing: the TXT
> record.
...and wouldn't you know it, it's because I was digging the wrong
domain name. N
it per what I found at
https://serverfault.com/questions/571720/publishing-long-domain-key-records-in-bind9.
(Running 9.10.3.dfs in Debian Stable.) There doesn't seem to be a clue
as to what's going on at this point, so I'm a bit lost. Help?
-Dennis Carr
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 01:08:42 -0500
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 12:17 AM, Dennis Carr
> wrote:
>
> > Suffice it to say, I seem to be doing it wrong.
>
> In a creatively diverse number of ways. :-)
Well Viktor, we can't say I do everything right, now, ca
:
\/.qq.com$/ REJECT
...and the reference to this file in main.cf is:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access,
...
...what'd I miss?
If needed I can stick the files up on a pastebin.
-Dennis Carr
This is fairly normal. It just means that postfix can't figure out the name of
the connecting box by resolution or host look-up.
-Dennis Carr
On May 15, 2018 11:34:30 AM PDT, for...@mehl-family.fr wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When I send a mail with roundcube from my computer I find this messa
ntainer dies.
I don't know much about Docker, but would it be possible to just start
a shell script therein that pretty much does nothing, e.g. 'while true
()' as PID 1?
-Dennis Carr
hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
In a nutshell: what am I missing here?
-Dennis CArr
a bank).
This means, then, that I should probably remove it from the SPF record
- at its current configuration, the ~all should at least softfail while
I work on getting Postfix set up for TLS.
-Dennis Carr
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 20:54:58 -0700
Jithesh AP jithesh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am newbie into mail and mTA setup.
Welcome. =)
I have my port 465 smtps/587 (submission) working, so do i need to
keep port 25 open?
I am asking this because when i try to telnet gmail then it does not
work, so
To briefly explain my system - I have my workstation and server, both
running Debian Wheezy (current stable). If I send mail, Postfix (2.9.6)
passes to my server via an ssh tunnel on port 2525 (relayhost for this).
Now, the relevant part. On the workstation, there are a few key
aliases I have
I'm basically looking for such an option - for all intents, if a domain
is not, for some reason, in the RBLs, one could manually add the domain
into such a list. In particular, I'm looking to do this to
hostwinds.net and bluemountain14.com, as they do not seem to test
positive in the RBLs.
Or,
Running 2.7.1 on Debian Squeeze.
I'm a tad concerned when looking at my syslog on a transaction. I
currently have my workstation configured to ssh tunnel into my server,
the latter of which is in a remote location from me (local port is
2525, to port 25 on the server), and I've noticed this
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:22:53 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
* please do not strip most informations from log, one stripped line
is not enough
* which machine throws the warning
That would be clever, wouldn't it? =D
Here's a single transaction from bast, using account
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:08:26 -0600
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Dennis, how many computer books, or books in general, do you own? Do
you have any on display? Or are they all simply hoarded away in boxes
in the attic or basement?
Two shelves of books I could use regularly on
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:50:48 -0700
Glenn English g...@slsware.com wrote:
Have you considered printing (parts of) the website?
I hadn't, but being a broke college student, it may cost a bit. I
could probably pull off printing it on campus though
-Dennis
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:10:11 +
Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
The basic concepts (what you need to understand) have not changed
much, in that sense the old books are fine. The specific facts you
need to know to tweak Postfix to do non-routine tasks may have
changed a
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:35:46 +0100
Patrick Ben Koetter p...@sys4.de wrote:
I am working on an updated version as time permits.
Thank you, Patrick. Looking forward to the newer version when it's out
there.
-Dennis
not been updated in eight years.
I miss my dead tree versions being current. =/
-Dennis Carr
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Dennis Carr wrote:
I miss my dead tree versions being current. =/
and having said all this, I realize I forgot the query, but it may be
foregone. =) Does anyone know who's currently published the most recent
documentation for Postfix in a dead-tree form?
-Dennis
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dennis Carr:
and having said all this, I realize I forgot the query, but it may be
foregone. =) Does anyone know who's currently published the most recent
documentation for Postfix in a dead-tree form?
Have you tried a bookseller's search
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:18:13 + (UTC)
Kshitij mali kshitij.m...@orange.com wrote:
Hello sir ,
Please delete the thread or atleast hide the ipadress and email
address in the content on the below archived post:
You have already asked this. Wietse made it perfectly clear that the
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012, Jon Miller wrote:
ad...@desborough.com.au: localhost: No address associated with hostname
In a nutshell, Postfix thinks that the address 'admin@$host' does not
exist. What does /etc/postfix/aliases say about admin@? Vaguely
important: does it point to a live account?
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
what i do not understand is how f^%@#!!$ stupid
people are spamming to postmaster/abuse-addresses
(bowdlerized for comical effect -ed)
As near as I can tell, the spammers just run under a few assumptions. RFC
requires one to maintain those
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
what i do not understand is how %#^%$@!! stupid
people are spamming to postmaster/abuse-addresses
Oh. One other thing - they don't care. There is no courtesy. They don't
care if you scream at them, yell at them, because people are paying them
to
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Rod Dorman wrote:
The suggested (i.e. SHOULD) SMTP timeouts are given in minutes. No human
typing the commands is going to have any difficulty.
Never underestimate the power (or lack thereof) of a hunt-and-pecker
unfamiliar with coputers tasked with doing this. =)
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Leslie León Sinclair wrote:
I´m testing a server, so I need to unable people[users], to connect via
telnet[smtp.mydomain.com:25] to the mail server.
If you're testing it, your best bet is to either a) bring it up as long as
you need to test it, and then shut it down when
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Leslie León Sinclair wrote:
Can anyone point me in the right direction, I´m stucked here and Google
is not helping...
If you mean the act of disabling the ability of using a telnet client to
connect to port 25, you're best not doing this - or, just set any session
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Barbara M. wrote:
My plan is to update Postfix (and dovecot, procmail), in the old box to the
release in the new box and when tested, move user/data to the new box (new
box is 64 bit while old box is 32 bit, but hope this isn't a problem).
Copying the old /etc/postfix dir
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Andreas Berton wrote:
Merry christmas to you all!
You as well! Have a safe and happy holiday, and a prosperous 2012!
ANd as to the subject - no, I don't rest. This is what espresso and Red
Bull are for. =D
-Dennis
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Because this thread has veered off into a general discussion about mail
operation/policy, would you consider taking it off-list or to a more
appropriate forum, e.g. the mailop list?
Agreed. I'm stunned that a tongue in cheek comment of mine has
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, /dev/rob0 wrote:
Why do you want to do that? What would be wrong with
rejecting that address?
/dev/null is just the proper repository to recycle bits. We don't want to
run out. =^_^=
In all seriousness, I guess it depends on who you ask. For the original
poster's
this, or some sort of online guide I can
follow that can guide me through the process?
-Dennis Carr
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
We're now using a hosted fax service and receive our faxes via email to a
dedicated address. Is there a method via Postfix I can have these printed
when received? Or do I handle this via mda scripting (at the moment, Dovecot
with Sieve).
Throwing one more in for Mailman.
-Dennis Carr
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr wrote:
Hello
We are moving our old LISTSERV server after 15 years of very good
services :-)
Lsoft prices have grown up amazingly so I plan
Check with your ISP, make sure spf and domain keys are up to date, and install
a mailing list manager like Mailman.
-Dennis Carr
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Amira Othman a.oth...@cairosource.com wrote:
Hi all
I want to send mails to all users I have
I'd suggest configuring as secondary, setting the MX record for this box as a
primary, and use transport maps as suggested.
-Dennis Carr
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity and top
posting.
Jason Gauthier jgauth...@lastar.com wrote:
Greetings,
Due
Over the past couple days I'm noticing mail coming in from outside that is
supposedly from users of mine - but apparently isn't. HELO message comes
from chez-vrolet.net which is in my $mynetworks setting, but the IP
address for the incoming machine does not match DNS.
What adjustment in
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Reindl Harald wrote:
mynetworks has nothing to do with DNS/PTR/HELO
mynetworks is for IP-ADDRESSES/NETWORKS which are allowed to relay and
override settings in smtp-restricitions
That does eliminate it from the equation, but I still need to block this
crap from coming
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Reindl Harald wrote:
in your case you have to place the check_sender_access policy in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions AFTER permit_mynetworks and
permit_sasl_authenticated
so only internal hosts and authenticated users are allowed to
use in this policy listed domains
Being
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Reindl Harald wrote:
and how will HELO change anything in Over the past couple days I'm noticing
mail coming in
from outside that is supposedly from users of mine? sure you can restrict HELO
but it solves
not the real problem that you will stop forged-from of your domains
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
If he wants to reject hosts that HELO as his own, he can check his own
SPF record, and reject anything that softfails.
...spf does that?
-Dennis
mallah.raj...@gmail.com mallah.raj...@gmail.com wrote:
Coming back to real issue,i have already initiated password policy
control. But i feel its not impossible for the enduser to somehow leak
the password, passwords are commonly
remembered by muas and possibility of virus and malware
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Frank Bonnet wrote:
But to fight spam and all other malicious
problems it's getting more and more sophisticated
and complex to configure every day.
It is not a criticism it is a fact that jump
to every sysadmin's face.
Does anyone has knowing of the future of SMTP ?
Is
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.03.2011 12:38, schrieb Steve:
I really don't understand why people keep telling that spam is a problem?
because there are peopole out their whose time costs money?
This prt of the problem I suspect is marginal. It's not the cost, it's
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Makara wrote:
Hi All,
I'm plesk control panel administrator. In this few days I found there are
many deferred message in mailq and I know that hosting server is sending hug
spam message out. Here is the log from postfix.
Turn up the log deg level a bit and it will show
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Jay G. Scott wrote:
they haven't started shouting yet, but i sense it's coming.
i don't think i need to be exhaustive. but right now
i don't have anything i can use to win this argument,
objectively, anyway.
And ed is the standard editor, and has a great memory
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
See Zip Attachment
I see it. What is this?
-Dennis
I just set up basic configurations for SMTP AUTH (and, the next step,
SASL) for my server, however I cannot seem to make it work quite
right. Using the instructions at
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html, focusing on using dovecot as
it is present. (Note, dovecot is not the active POP3/IMAP4
) A better way to do this, using already existing mechanisms in
Postfix, or...
2) a way to tell Postfix to turn on the ssh tunnel for the period
required to deliver mail on delivery to the daemon, and then flush the
queue, at which point the tunnel is closed?
-Dennis Carr
Looking at options here for eliminating backscatter.
I've reviewed the Howto for this, but it only seems to be effective
against backscatter where one's home domain is forged - not too useful,
IMNSHO, because spammers aren't always going to forge the home domain.
One thing I've been looking
51 matches
Mail list logo
