Re: XFORWARD Vs PDP

2008-10-29 Thread Gustav Meirinho
If it can not be done at the moment, all right (I found a similar request in 2006 - message 209338). My real problem is this: Many customers use mail groups (virtual_alias_maps). Each destination account can create their own rules for releasing and blocking, which is consulted by the

Re: Delivery for local users when using pam_mysql (PAM)

2008-10-29 Thread Gustav Meirinho
Try this: # perl -e 'print getpwnam "username",$/' Ilo Lorusso escreveu: if getpwnam() is a system library routine and not a command how would I go about performing those tests? please forgive my ignorance .. On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XFORWARD Vs PDP

2008-10-29 Thread Gustav Meirinho
Guys, I'm still accepting ideas. :D Gustav Meirinho escreveu: If it can not be done at the moment, all right (I found a similar request in 2006 - message 209338). My real problem is this: Many customers use mail groups (virtual_alias_maps). Each destination account can

Re: XFORWARD Vs PDP

2008-10-27 Thread Gustav Meirinho
- Hash: SHA1 Victor Duchovni schrieb: | On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 04:19:18PM -0200, Gustav Meirinho wrote: | | How can I integrate the XForward command with PDP, to have more | complete information of an envelope, regardless of the instance used? | | WTF PDP? Even if we knew

Re: XFORWARD Vs PDP

2008-10-27 Thread Gustav Meirinho
Exactly the opposite. This would be the desired response in "PDP": request=smtpd_access_policy protocol_state=RCPT protocol_name=SMTP helo_name=some.domain.tld queue_id=8045F2AB23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] recipient_count=0 client_address=1.2.3.4 client_name=another.domain.tld