Isn't this *thoroughly* off-topic for this mailing list?
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:51:15 +0200
אנטולי קרסנר tomback...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the mailing list is a legitimate way to connect with all postfix
users ...
The mailing list I thought was supposed to be about Postfix, or at
least vaguely Postfix-related, issues. By your logic: If I want to
On Thu, 10 May 2012 23:23:43 +0200
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
Den 2012-05-10 14:40, James Seymour skrev:
Eh? Explain, please?
check_policy_service must be after reject_unlisted_recipient
[snip]
that makes sure greylist is not called for unlisted users that will
be rejected
Hi All,
I'm using the SPF policy daemon. Works great (or appears to, anyway),
save one thing: The rejects claim Recipient address rejected, when,
in reality, it's the sender's address that's being rejected. This leads
to confusion.
Short of reworking my rules so I can place the SPF check under
I *just* realized that, in previous release announcements, I hadn't
been writing about where to get it from. Doh!
Here you go:
http://jimsun.linxnet.com/postfix_contrib.html
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:00:39 -0500
James Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
Pflogsumm version 1.1.3 has been released. This is a Beta release.
[snip]
*sigh* s/1.1.3/1.1.4/
The Subject: is correct.
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:23:46 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[snip]
Thanks, Jim.
You're welcome, Wietse. And thank *you* for Postfix.
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is
Hi All,
Just upgraded our mailserver. Thought I had everything set the same as
I did with the old one. Nonetheless, of all the people who *can't*
send email, it would have to be the President of the company.
I do have broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes. Postfix version is 2.7.0,
running on an
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:51:51 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
[snip]
at least show some parts of the logfile
Very well. Not much to see...
Jan 29 20:42:26 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[7781]: connect from
c-68-43-238-106.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.43.238.106] Jan 29 20:42:27 mail
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:08:55 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[snip]
Have you compared the SMTP server EHLO replies (with openssl
s_client)?
No. That'd be difficult, tho not impossible, to do at this point, as
the old server is up in storage.
But this is certainly an
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:21:36 -0600
Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
[snip]
If the client attempts SASL, postfix will log either success or
failure. Looks as if the client didn't even try.
Exactly. And that should've been my clue that the mechanism(s) offered
weren't to the client's
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:15:35 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[snip]
In the logging you will see postfix/smtps/smtpd,
postfix/submission/smtpd and postfix/smtpd.
[snip]
Two things (addressed to the OP and other readers):
1. This will break Pflogsumm. It expects to
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:52:21 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
James Seymour:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:15:35 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[snip]
In the logging you will see postfix/smtps/smtpd,
postfix/submission/smtpd and postfix
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:00:14 +0200
Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
[snip]
Can you please at least provide directions on how to do the fix when
logging as postfix/submission/smtpd??
Quick fix is attached as pflogsumm_quickfix.txt. There's no line
numbers, as I'm working from the next
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:57:12 -0500
Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:03:59 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Wietse Venema:
bge1 @0:24 b my_outside_ip,25 - 89.73.201.168,36545 PR
tcp len 20 40 -AR OUT
Why are you blocking
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:38 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[snip]
There are two stateful engines: the TCP stack and ipfilter.
*nodding*
With keep state, ipfilter remembers the connection and lets
packets pass, up to the point that ipfilter believes the connection
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:11:26 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
James Seymour:
The TCP stack sends an outbound ACK|RST because it received
*something* on port 25. Your firewall should not have passed that.
Should not have passed it *incoming*, do you mean?
Indeed
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:10:11 +0530 (IST)
Ramesh itsrames...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Hi List,
I
would like know to steps required to hide private ip address in
postfix, ...
[snip]
Header checks with appropriate regexp and IGNORE.
...and also shows public ip address of firewall instead of
Good Day,
I'm trying to bring up a new machine that serves several purposes and
have run into a potentially Very Big Problem.
The machine has two physical interfaces, one LAN-facing and one
Internet-facing. So, naturally, I have something like:
Let's say 10.1.1.0 is the Internet-facing network
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:45:53 -0700
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Sorry about the noob questions, but it's been 12 years or more since
I stared at Postfix...
First, is there a way to get an out-of-the-box (in my case, Postfix
2.6.6 compiled for Centos6/EPEL6)
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:27:07 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[snip]
I suggest that you use different smtp_bind_address settings in
master.cf for the (default) smtp transport and for the (inbound)
relay transport.
This server is, amongst other things, a mail gateway. It
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:31:14 -0400
Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote:
[snip]
## SPAM STUFF and REJECT CODES ##
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_helo_access
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:12:07 -0400
Simon Brereton simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote:
[snip]
... but if I put reject_unknown_recipient_domain there
postconf.5 says it will
Reject the request when Postfix is not final destination for the
recipient domain, and the RCPT TO domain has no DNS A
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:17:12 +0200
wei...@dfbnet.org wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
I read about mailgraph and pflogsumm but these stats are not
as detailed as i try to have.
You want *more* detail than Pflogsumm gives? Wow. Most people have
been pestering me to *reduce* it.
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011
G'day All,
My Postfix fu is weak these days, so I'm going to ask for a bit of
help. I've dredged-up all I could remember of advanced Postfix
techniques, trawled the various docs and HowTos, and haven't been able
to solve this.
We have multiple domains. We have one mail gateway. We have two
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:41:16 -0400 (EDT)
Gary Chambers gwch...@gwcmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Will someone please assist me in determining the problem or offer any
short- (or long-) term suggestions? Thank you very much!
What problem are you trying to solve?
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:23:42 -0400 (EDT)
Gary Chambers gwch...@gwcmail.com wrote:
Jim,
What problem are you trying to solve?
Thanks for the reply.
I've been poring over the backscatterer README and from what I can
tell, my server isn't the problem.
I don't see a problem, other than
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:24:41 -0400 (EDT)
Gary Chambers gwch...@gwcmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Thanks. Once the sick feeling in my stomach subsided and I started
seeing things a bit more clearly, I realized that I just probably had
to ride it out.
Ride it out? LOL! That's probably going to get
Replying to Yan via a follow-up to Zoltan, as I didn't see Yan's
original question...
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:08:30 +0200
Zoltan Balogh zee.bal...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/12 Zhou, Yan yz...@medplus.com
[snip]
I have seen some options relying on passing the maillog file, I
wonder if there
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:15:50 +0200
Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de wrote:
Am 15.04.2011 15:06, schrieb James Seymour:
I'm curious: How might one gather and process mail server statistics
*other* than parsing and processing the mail server's log file(s)?
Query amavis snmp
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:17:06 +0200
Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* James Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com:
I'm curious: How might one gather and process mail server statistics
*other* than parsing and processing the mail server's log file(s)?
The server could
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:50:21 +0100
Houcem HACHICHA houcem.hachi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using postfix and I would like to send an image in the email
signature.
Any idea how to do this?
Postfix is an MTA (Mail Transport Agent, or mail server). Things like
what goes in your email
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:06:22 +0300
Tolga to...@ozses.net wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to have pflogsumm detail the report by domain? eg.
291 messages received by example.com
354 messages received by example.net
xxx messages received by example.org
[snip]
No.
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My
33 matches
Mail list logo
