On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 10:33:37 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wrote:
[snip]
>
> With rsyslogd.conf you can route based on content.
>
> :msg, contains, "SASL LOGIN" /var/log/whatever
> :msg, contains, "SASL LOGIN" ~
>
> This is based on information from the web, which is often incorrect.
Ok.
Hi All,
Each of the various servers I admin occasionally get inundated with
things like
Jan 13 07:33:06 jimsun postfix/submission/smtpd[25328]: warning:
unknown[59.95.95.239]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed:
UGFzc3dvcmQ6
I want these to go to the auth log, rather than, or in
Hi All,
I just installed, configured and have working OpenDKIM. I can see
outgoing email is being properly signed, but not certain what it's doing
for me on the receiving side of things?
All the searching and reading I've done talks all about how to get it
going, and how to test your outgoing
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:48:24 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Jim Seymour:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just installed, configured and have working OpenDKIM. I can see
> > outgoing email is being properly signed, but not certain what it's
> > d
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:50:26 +0200
Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:57:40PM -0400, Jim Seymour wrote:
Hey Jim,
I've got some other things people have sent me I need to look
to. I suppose it's about time pflogsumm got some attention.
In case you manage
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:12:12 +0200
li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Aug 25 14:55:15 mail-gw postfix/postscreen[29302]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from [119.75.11.68]:53210: 550 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
client [119.75.11.68] blocked using *; from=,
to=mik...@outlook.it,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:40:52 +0530
tejas sarade tejas.a.sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Then there is no point in collecting usage details now.
Can you tell me if the the source of the mails.
For God's sake: Please learn how to trim quoted text. Thank you!
And please read this:
Pflogsumm version 1.1.5 has been released. This is a Beta release.
From the ChangeLog:
rel-1.1.5 20120205
Fixed RFC 3339 support. Releases 1.1.3 and 1.1.4 were badly
broken in this respect. Thanks and a tip o' the hat to Sven
Hoexter (sven-at-timegate-dot-de) for the help.
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:06:32 +0200
Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
On 1/2/2012 6:00 μμ, James Seymour wrote:
rel-1.1.4 20120201
Thank you James for offering and supporting this great tool.
You're welcome.
[snip]
Is there a way to include stats on SMTPD connections from
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:49:19 +0200
Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
Hello,
In the logs, there are cases where some message seems to be coming
from=.
That's because they are.
[snip]
In such cases PFLOGSUMM, instead of a domain name or full sender
address, displays in the stats
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:30:33 +
James Day james@ontraq.com wrote:
[snip]
... trying the same account details from Windows Live
Mail throws up a:
554 Relay Access denied error message.
[snip]
IIRC, Relay access denied is a symptom of a non-SSL attempted
connection/login when
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:04:18 +0100 (CET)
Barbara M. barb...@rfx.it wrote:
After upgrading my old box (Postfix 2.2 on CentOS 4.x), to
postfix-2.6.9-1.rhel4, I noticied this strange issue in my daily
pflogsum (and others), log analisys report:
[snip]
Mails are delivered to the mailboxes,
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:41:07 +0100
Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
[snip]
delay=0, changed into delay=0.04, delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.02,
Did you update pflogsumm as well?
Yup. You need Pflogsumm-1.1.1, at least, looks like. 1.1.3 has been
released for nearly two years.
I
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:56:40 -0600
/dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
[snip]
I'm not sure how that might affect pflogsumm.pl; perhaps if Jim is
still reading the list he can comment?
[snip]
I'm still reading, but I'm usually only seeing the stuff that
mentions Pflogsumm or my name. Tho, right
G'day Postfix'ers,
I'm in the process of building-up a new company mail server. It'll
be an IMAP4 beast, using Maildir, and so I allocated the vast majority
of the freespace to /home, for IMAP folder storage. Then it occurred
to me: I know my users have poor habits, and tend to leave much of
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:15:28 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[snip]
To turn on maildir support, append a trailing '/' to the name.
Yes, I caught that. (But thanks for the note, anyway). I plan to
let inbox be mbox format, just like it is in a normal mail spool.
Dovecot
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:30:12 +
Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
You could also use Dovecot LDA or LMTP. Dovecot will create
the directory structure automatically upon the first login or
message delivery.
Wouldn't I lose Postfix' header and body processing if I did
Hi All,
This may be a weird one, and may be completely OT. If the latter:
Feel free to tell me to bugger off :)
System is FreeBSD 8.2, running ipfilter and
postfix-current-2.9.2019,4.
Occasionally I see something like this from ipfilter in
/var/log/messages:
bge1 @0:24 b
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:14:08 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
[snip]
why do you use reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname if you do
not like the results of it?
Why do you answer the question when you obviously have not read it?
(Or at least apparently not understood it.)
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 18:35:23 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[snip]
Why are you blocking outbound TCP RST?
I am not, to the best of my knowledge.
There is a TCP control traffic rate limit in the border router, there
as a DoS prevention tactic, but that's it.
This
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:11:00 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 12.12.2011 01:04, schrieb Jim Seymour:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:14:08 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
[snip]
why do you use reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname if you do
not like
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:15:35 -0500
Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
Each of them occurs two-or-more
times, involving the same contacting IP.
Clarification: That was to say that, when it occurs multiple times
in a row, it's the same IP trying over-and-over again in each set of
retries
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:03:59 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Wietse Venema:
bge1 @0:24 b my_outside_ip,25 - 89.73.201.168,36545 PR
tcp len 20 40 -AR OUT
Why are you blocking outbound TCP RST?
According to ipmon(8),
The web is rotting my brain. I never
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:04:44 +0100
Ignacio sanfermi...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
The application connects to a smtp server and sent an e-mail as:
SENDER: user1@domain
TO: user2@domain;user3@domain
From this smtp server we would like to relay e-mail to Corporate
Exchange
server.This server
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 19:00:55 -0800 (PST)
email builder emailbuilde...@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
OK, rsync it is.
Can you restore a system crash with a simple
rsync backed set of duplicate files?
[snip]
Never tried it :p I suspect not.
TBH: Other than a Unix SYS3 installation, running
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 17:37:31 +0100
Ignacio sanfermi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Jim,
Thank you very much, but there are more than 1000 possible options,
and they change almost every week. It depends on projects and
people involved in them.
One of us is confused. How would creating an alias
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:46:00 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
James Seymour:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:27:07 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
[snip]
I suggest that you use different smtp_bind_address settings in
master.cf for the (default) smtp
Wow, over 48 hours and no solution(s) suggested? Everybody on
vacation? :)
Regards,
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:00:10 -0300
From: Julio Cesar Covolato ju...@psi.com.br
To: Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com, owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Pflogsumm Version 1.1.3 Released
Hi Jim!
Any improviment to suport the reinjection from amavisd?
Nope. If I had
Pflogsumm version 1.1.3 has *finally* been released. This is a Beta
release.
From the ChangeLog:
rel-1.1.3 20100320
Added long-awaited switches to optionally reduce detail reporting:
--bounce_detail=N, --deferral_detail=N, --reject_detail=N,
--smtp_detail=N,
Hi All,
As many of you may be aware, about a year ago I emailed the list
asking if anybody would be interested in taking over maintenance
of Pflogsumm. Several people volunteered. In the mean-time,
after un-loading a bit (basically taking a hiatus from anything
that resembled computer work in
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
KLaM Postmaster:
Among the stuff being rejected is the output of pflogsumm, I run a daily
a report and email it to postmaster. I was not getting the reports so I
See http://www.postfix.org/http://www.postfix.org/BUILTIN_FILTER_README.html
Hi All,
I'm simplifiying my life. Amonst other things, that means I'm dropping
my business class DSL circuit and all of my involvement in projects,
documentation, anti-spam efforts, etc.
If somebody *qualified* wants to officially take over maintenance of
Pflogsumm, please speak up.
Qualified
33 matches
Mail list logo
