Hello !
In sendmail it is possible to add this to mailertable
domain.comsmtp:[server1]
.smtp:[server2]:[server3]
If server2 is not responding, then send to server3.
Is that function available in Postfix and if not, will it be (it would be nice
to have
Hi.
Ok, thanks for the info.
Br
Johan
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
För Wietse Venema
Skickat: den 25 januari 2012 14:29
Till: Postfix users
Ämne: Re: Missing(?) function is Postfix
Johan Andersson:
Hello
Andersson
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: Re: SV: SV: Strange Postfix error
Johan Andersson:
The problem was solved with a full server reboot (rebooting the
zone where Postfix is running did not help).
Strangebut I'm happy for now.
I found a similar problem with Linux on some third-party website,
where
Johan Andersson:
Jan 19 23:56:21 servername postfix/cleanup[29089]: [ID 947731
mail.crit] fatal: fstat flow pipe write descriptor: Value too large
for defined data type
The logging comes from this code fragment:
ssize_t mail_flow_get(ssize_t len)
{
const char *myname
users
Ämne: Re: SV: Strange Postfix error
Johan Andersson:
Hi
Thanks for your answer.
I don't think that's the answerbecause i haven't replaced anything
really (well, apart from replacing the binaries with a copy of the
ones that were already running).
My reply was 100% about
Wietse Venema wrote:
Johan Andersson:
Hi,
We have a slight problem with accounts being phished/hacked and spammers
using them for their stuff.
Servers are as safe as the customer will make them at the moment...
which sadly means that some of the very mixed staff
answers phishing mails
.
Is there something ready for this or will I have to put a policy_filter
of my own together?
Thanks in ahead
Johan Andersson
Jaap Westerbeek wrote:
Ok the (or some) spammer came back.
For some reason everything seems to originate from localhost, which isn't
telling me much.
Where to look , what to do ?
its NOT orginitating from localhost, thats just the last step from you
amavis...
snip snip
This is the amavis
Wietse Venema wrote:
Bryan Irvine:
How long ago was that? I had the precise problem and had been told
that particular bug has been fixed. My problems were ~5 years ago.
Except that I'm never going to use it anyway because I just can't
force myself to trust it. I've used Postfix under ext3,
Hi,
We had MTA's that used a local AntiVirus to check incoming mails for
virus (throw) and spam (mark and deliver)
and outgoing mails for virus (reject)
Now we added an extra layer of hosts to run the AntiVirus and SPAM
checks for he incoming mails...
but we still want to use the local one
MailingListe wrote:
Zitat von Johan Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
We are thinking to implement some form of greylisting at one of our
sites and wonder which one of the many flavors out there
that this group have found reliable?
I know postfix has its builting one from a while back
Hi,
With all this discussion on how to and not to take care of legal
bounces, be they wanted or not...
How do you people take care of legal bounces that really are erronous?
What do I mean?
At one of our domains we get a lot of SPAM, thats relatively easily
handled with all the filters and
12 matches
Mail list logo
