On 15-Feb-2010, at 14:56, LuKreme wrote:
uri URI_BLIZZARD /\bblizzard\.com\b/i
Sorry, wrong list. Thought I was reading the spamassassin group.
--
Are you a lucky little lady in the city of light
Or just another lost angel?
I got the following from a user (email obfuscated). The user has an email
address on a domain hosted with me, but all emails are redirected to her gmail
account. THis has been working without issue for a long time.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
On 13-Feb-2010, at 07:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
Second, the Postfix SMTP server replies with a 552 status code when
the message exceeds the server's size limit:
I was surprised to see a 552 from google when there wasn't a 552 in the postfix
logs, that's what I meant; I did not mean to imply
On 11-Feb-2010, at 06:16, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Does anyone know how to whitelist a paticular IP when using tumgreyspf with
postfix?
Put the spf check later in your restrictions. After permit_mynetworks would be
good.
--
THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE DOES NOT END WITH HAIL SATAN
On 8-Feb-2010, at 17:34, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
100% of the servers I have access to, have,
at least once in the last year, been scanned by a bot (or person, who
knows) for /roundcoube or similar
And? I have thousands of servers trying to access my machines via sshd every
On 7-Feb-2010, at 19:53, john egan wrote:
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 20:49:31 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
unknown_relay_recipient_reject_code = 550
unknown_virtual_alias_reject_code = 550
unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code = 550
You
On 1-Feb-2010, at 13:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM:
I recommend and prefer Roundcube.
http://roundcube.net/
+1
If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead
of POP. JMHO.
Yeah, I have to say I don't even
On 29-Jan-2010, at 18:20, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Their theory being that the default of ON makes it easier for spammers to
harvest addresses.
That's a pretty stupid theory though.
--
I don't care if Bill Gates is the world's biggest philanthropist.
The pain he has inflicted on the
On 31-Jan-2010, at 12:21, Wietse Venema wrote:
Server implementations SHOULD support both VRFY and EXPN. For
security reasons, implementations MAY provide local installations a
way to disable either or both of these commands through configuration
options or the equivalent.
And
On Jan 23, 2010, at 9:17, Martijn de Munnik mart...@youngguns.nl
wrote:
SHOULD equals MUST unless you have a really good reason. I'm
trying to figure out if somebody on the list knows a really good
reason.
There is no really good reason for a 3 second timeout in a public
server. There
On 18-Jan-2010, at 14:20, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
/usr/bin/whtlst_gen.sh
#! /bin/sh
# [1] grab all sent to addresses from the current mail log
sed -n -e '/postfix\/smtp\[.*status=sent/s/^.*to=\([^]*\).*$/\1/p'
/var/log/mail.log | sort -u /tmp/sender_addrs.tmp
# merge the new addresses with
On 18-Jan-2010, at 17:15, Steve wrote:
You don't seem to be very confident in your Anti-Spam solution if you skip
certain senders. Does your Anti-Spam solution not have an mechanism to
automatically skip checking mails form senders you communicate often?
Oh, I dunno. I have manually
On 18-Jan-2010, at 10:28, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
LuKreme put forth on 1/18/2010 12:46 AM:
On Jan 17, 2010, at 17:27, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Then I'd surmise your experience is very limited.
I have only been running a mailserver for 17 years or so.
Do you use either
On 18-Jan-2010, at 11:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
This thread is NOT about address validation, it is about automatic
whitelisting of addresses (as senders) that are observed in outgoing
mail as recipients. No validation is required.
This should be pretty easy to add into a greylisting service
On Jan 17, 2010, at 13:26, Frank Cusack fcus...@fcusack.com wrote:
What is the reason for rejecting mail based on PTR records *at all*?
Erm.… some people seem to think PTR records are required.
On Jan 17, 2010, at 13:37, Daniel V. Reinhardt crypto...@yahoo.com
wrote:
So rejecting email email by PTR Records is a spam prevention thing.
Can you back this up at all? It's certainly not true in my experience
and hasn't been true in a long time.
On Jan 17, 2010, at 17:27, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Then I'd surmise your experience is very limited.
I have only been running a mailserver for 17 years or so.
On 16-Jan-2010, at 12:24, Wietse Venema wrote:
To address that issue, I would like to be able to use another character
(_ or .) that is commonly accepted as part of email addresses, instead.
Address transformation mappings are always queried at recipient
validation time, so you can't use a
On 14-Jan-2010, at 04:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is that possible for mail headers field to continue multiple /^From: .*/
speaking in terms of maildrop and PCRE?
According to RFC 5322:
from= From: mailbox-list CRLF
mailbox-list= (mailbox *(, mailbox)) /
On 13-Jan-2010, at 06:33, Alexandru Florescu wrote:
The odd thing is that this actually works. I can connect and send mails
spoofing the sender's address, despite my postfix configuration directives:
Your problem is not with postfix. Your problem is with thinking SMTP is
something it is not
On 11-Jan-2010, at 09:27, Dennis Putnam wrote:
I am quite familiar with the arguments but again it is not my choice. If you
want, I can give you the number of our corporate lawyers and you can try to
convince them. Perhaps you will have better luck than me. :-)
I will be happy to email them
On Jan 4, 2010, at 16:08, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote:
would have expected you to
say, a MTA which ignores basic basic configuration rules doesn't
deserve that it's mail should be accepted. In fact, this is the way I
feel about this.
Seconded.
On Jan 3, 2010, at 13:14, richard lucassen mailingli...@lucassen.org
wrote:
but a mlm is quite some overkill IMHO
An mlm is certainly not overkill for 3,000 recipients.
On 30-Dec-2009, at 11:43, Port Able wrote:
are: has anyone used Postfix for this purpose?
Sure, lots of people.
Do the online ESP's develop their own email servers?
Bwahahahahah! Um. No.
Do any of them use Sendmail, Postfix or quail?
Almost certainly almost all of them use one of those.
On 30-Dec-2009, at 12:20, Brian Mathis wrote:
I've not used mailmain or ezmlm for this purpose, but so called
mailing list software that's available as open source is often meant
to be used for having discussions with numerous people through email.
Using systems like that as a bulk mailer is
On 10-Dec-2009, at 23:36, Alexander wrote:
Mr Rob0,
I really take exception to your insulting language.
There was no insulting language. Someone who took time to HELP YOU was pointing
out that YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG. You can either learn, or you can get your
panties in a twist in which case
On 9-Dec-2009, at 22:23, Eero Volotinen wrote:
3) We currently have all our members configured as virtual users with
all their email stored as maildir stores under /var/mail/example.com. We
are considering giving each member a personal space, probably under
/home (there would be no local login
On 2-Dec-2009, at 20:50, Noel Jones wrote:
Make sure you postmap the files on the new system;
Ahh… THAT had not occurred to me. Will check that and get back to you :)
--
You know, in a world in which Bush and Blair can be nominated for
the Nobel Peace Prize, for having dared to take
OK, in preparation for moving to new hardware I've copied all the mail from the
working machine to the new machine, installed postfix and copied over my
/usr/local/etc/postfix folder so that I have identical configs on both machines.
Now, I haven't changed the MX records as yet because I want
On 2-Dec-2009, at 06:44, Noel Jones wrote:
Postfix doesn't use MX records to decide what domains to accept (unless
you're using the permit_mx_backup hack).
Maybe virtual_mailbox_domains isn't set.
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
Well, other than a couple of edits that I
On 2-Dec-2009, at 10:39, Noel Jones wrote:
Domains listed in virtual_alias_domains MUST be rewritten to another domain
in virtual_alias_maps.
It is in the hash:$config_directory/virtual
kreme.com DOMAIN
krem...@kreme.com kremels
--
The Germans wore gray, you wore blue.
On 2-Dec-2009, at 11:56, Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/2/2009 12:48 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2009, at 10:39, Noel Jones wrote:
Domains listed in virtual_alias_domains MUST be rewritten to another domain
in virtual_alias_maps.
It is in the hash:$config_directory/virtual
kreme.com
On 2-Dec-2009, at 15:54, Noel Jones wrote:
If they were identical, there wouldn't be a problem.
They are identical. The various virtual files were copied via rsync and have
been verified as identical with diff which is why I thought the MX was the
issue.
I'll try it again with the same
On 30-Nov-2009, at 15:40, b...@electricembers.net wrote:
I know there are instructions in the INSTALL document how to port postfix
to unsupported systems but I wonder if the list here has any help for
getting postfix built on newly released FreeBSD 8.0. . .
Did `portinstall postfix` not
On 24-Nov-2009, at 10:39, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
That is easy.
Have your users connect to the submission port
Yes Wietse, I've considered this simple and clean option, but we're a
hosting company and the costumers are to lazy to understand and accept an
approach like this.
Force
On Nov 21, 2009, at 5:04, Jerry postfix.u...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is Yahoo's claim correct or are they simply trying to cover up for a
problem on their end?
As stated, yahoo is at least misleading.
Case MUST be honored in the user name portion (before the @ ).
Otherwise, email assesses are not
On 17-Nov-2009, at 19:53, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:26:34PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 17-Nov-2009, at 15:56, Nicholas Robinson wrote:
I altered the entry in /etc/aliases to
/etc/postfix/aliases
Why do you suggest this? Typically the default value is:
alias_maps = hash
On 17-Nov-2009, at 20:58, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, LuKreme wrote:
My aliases has always been at /etc/postfix/aliases
Now *that* is atypical.
No, it's really not. Anyone who's been using postfix for a while is quite
likely to have their alias file in the postfix folder
On 17-Nov-2009, at 23:46, LuKreme wrote:
I first setup postfix in … 1999? 2000?
Erm, confusion reins. It was late in 2002 with, iirc, a prerelease 2.x
--
'Are you Death?'
IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. --The Fifth Elephant
On 12-Nov-2009, at 13:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
This an incredibly unsafe tool.
Ooo, those are my favorite kinds!
--
The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere,
someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people
over there on fire, but
On 12-Nov-2009, at 21:09, Alex wrote:
But helo is a component of the envelope, no?
No.
--
[TN]FBMachine i got kicked out of Barnes and Noble once for
moving all the bibles into the fiction section
On 9-Nov-2009, at 06:25, Arora, Sumit wrote:
Hi folks,
Do not hijack other threads if you want help. Create a NEW message,
not a reply to other messages.
Also, read http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail before posting.
--
I WILL NOT FAKE MY WAY THROUGH LIFE
Bart
On 8-Nov-2009, at 10:13, Jon Musselwhite wrote:
Hi, I've been searching everywhere for this and can't seem to find a
solution.
I'm runing a centos 5 server with postfix and cyrus on it and would
like to
send a notification email to a cell phone email address when new
mail is
received on a
On 3-Nov-2009, at 07:13, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Anyone have a filter they'd like to share that rejects mail at smtp
based on known malicious attachment file types?
main.cf:
mime_header_checks = pcre:$config_directory/mime_headers.pcre
$ cat mime_headers.pcre
On 3-Nov-2009, at 13:29, Brett Kislin wrote:
Hello all,
On Oct 30, 2009, ICANN announced that the Fast Track Process will
begin on Nov 16, 2009, which will allow non-Latin characters in
domain names.
Non-latin characters have been allowed in domain names for a long time.
For example:
On 27-Oct-2009, at 09:00, Harakiri wrote:
--- On Tue, 10/27/09, Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net wrote:
From: Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net
I reject with zen before greylisting.
Hi,
thanks for your reply - i had thought about it - but since RBL is an
external service - it takes more
On 24-Oct-2009, at 09:52, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
delay=180, delays=0.11/0/0.1/180, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
(conversation with 202.162.240.2[202.162.240.2] timed out while
sending
message body)
Wietse:
You have set your SMTP client timeouts TOO LOW.
A timeout of 180s for
On 20-Oct-2009, at 02:59, Angelo Amoruso wrote:
Try to troubleshooting doing a simple telnet on port TCP/25 on the
remote host.
If you can get the welcome banner from the remote SMTP server, the
issue is somewhere else.
Nope,. you have to check a full transaction. Rogers, like some ISPs,
On 16-Oct-2009, at 13:31, Matt Friedman wrote:
For an internet facing postfix server, is TLS strictly required?
Of course not.
Do I need to obtain an SSL certificate for this?
You can, but you can also use a self-signed cert.
What would happen if I didn't use TLS? Would I be inviting
On 14-Oct-2009, at 14:25, Bob Cohen wrote:
I have set up SpamAssissin with an account to collect rejected
emails. Is there a way to periodically empty the mail queue for
that account with a cron job or some other such method that does not
require human intervention
here's what I use:
5
On 7-Oct-2009, at 13:40, Dave Täht wrote:
I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too.
Nah, I WANT IPv6 to work, but the fact of the matter is, it's not. The
ISPs have no interest in supporting it, and until it is simple for
users to get static IPv6 addresses and rDNS on
On 7-Oct-2009, at 14:48, Wietse Venema wrote:
This is no longer about Postfix. Take it off-list, please.
Sorry, replied before reading this.
--
What's a Velvet Underground? You wouldn't like it. Oh,
Be-bop.
On 6-Oct-2009, at 09:37, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Your time in this regard
would be much better spent building a new supercharged 440 Hemi to
drop
into a '70 Barracuda that you've redone from the frame rails up. ;)
That's a much more worthy use of your time.
Yeah, I have to agree, and I didn't
On 6-Oct-2009, at 15:02, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
In real life almost ALL mails are base64 encoded...
Wait, what?
$ grep -ir ^Content-Transfer-Encoding . | wc -l
198485
$ grep -ir ^Content-Transfer-Encoding . | grep -v base64 | wc -l
195574
Looking at my mail spool almost ALL mail is either
On 1-Oct-2009, at 12:42, Eero Volotinen wrote:
RBps: What is 'rtfm'? What does that stand for?
It means that you need to read the friendly manual on the long run.
The 'f' does not stand for 'friendly'.
Read The F-ing Manual
--
I know she's in there, said Verence, holding his crown in his
On 27-Sep-2009, at 23:41, Russell Jones wrote:
Sep 28 00:29:58 server2 postfix/smtpd[3447]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from c-98-197-128-40.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[98.197.128.40]: 550 5.1.1 sadasd...@example.com
: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table;
On Sep 27, 2009, at 0:53, Erick Calder e...@arix.com wrote:
if the message were for no-ex...@arix.com then it gets rerouted to n...@arix.com
which also doesn't exist and therefor bounces.
Yes, it bounces. This makes you a backacatter source. This is bad.
On Sep 27, 2009, at 3:52, Erick Calder e...@arix.com wrote:
but doesn't my postfix server bounce by default when receiving a
mail for an inexistent address?
No, not generally. Unknown users are REJECTed, not bounced.
On Sep 26, 2009, at 0:08, Barney Desmond barneydesm...@gmail.com
wrote:
LuKreme: sure, it's easy to describe the generally-expected behaviour,
but I suspect Wietse's point is that you're welcome to write the patch
and make sure nothing breaks. *grin*
Aye, there's the rub.
On Sep 24, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
Postfix is not Psychic.
Have you tried postfix —psychic?
$ postfix --psychic
postfix: error: to submit mail, use the Postfix sendmail command
postfix: fatal: the postfix --psychic command is reserved for the
On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:12, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
wrote:
On 9/24/2009, LuKreme (krem...@kreme.com) wrote:
virtual_alias_maps =
hash:$config_directory/virtual
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
pcre:$config_directory/virtual_sql.pcre,
proxy:mysql
On Sep 25, 2009, at 15:30, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
What if one address matches more than one element in your delimiter
set?
Only match on the first delimited found, seems like the best idea.
user.extension-word+...@example.com
If the delimited is + then the extension is
On 25-Sep-2009, at 20:35, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Provide 'postconf -d' output please.
How is that going to help?
from man postfconf:
-d Print default parameter settings instead of actual
settings.
--
Master, what is the difference between a humanistic, monastic
system of
On 24-Sep-2009, at 08:57, wiskbr...@hotmail.com
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can I have two or more virtual aliases maps?
Sure. Here are mine
virtual_alias_maps =
hash:$config_directory/virtual
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
pcre:$config_directory/virtual_sql.pcre,
On 24-Sep-2009, at 15:34, Erick Calder wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Erick Calder wrote:
I've been asking at the google groups mailing list with no results
so I
figure I'd try this list:
how can I customise the notice
On 21-Sep-2009, at 08:47, Victor Duchovni wrote:
It may be useful to highlight for review parameter names that are not
known to postconf -d (i.e. not built-in). Also any parameters
defined
more than once (the last value wins, but there really should be just
one
setting of each parameter).
On 21-Sep-2009, at 08:54, Pirate wrote:
I trying to filter out unwanted mails with no bat, exe and other
potential unwanted files.
main.cf:
mime_header_checks = pcre:$config_directory/mime_headers.pcre
mime_headers.pcre:
/^\s*Content-(Disposition|Type).*name\s*=\s*?(.*\.(ade|adp|bas|bat|
On 19-Sep-2009, at 16:56, Gerry Gam wrote:
I have this in virtual:
nob...@mydomain.com nobody
@mydomain.com me
Reading the docs I'm led to believe that the first line has
precedence and should catch those emails (I have nobody set in /etc/
aliases to /dev/null). However, emails to
On 16-Sep-2009, at 05:28, Laurence Moughan wrote:
postmap -q boarding regexp:/etc/postfix/headerchecks
This comes back with nothing - i thought it might coma back with a
match ?
/^From:(.*)boarding_...@domain\.com/ REJECT junk
/^From:(*)boarding(*)\...@adomain\.com/ REJECT junk
/^From:
I have a user who is constantly mistyping a specific domain that he
sends mail to on a regular basis. This has been going on for a couple
of years, and every time he complains to be about messages not being
delivered, or 'being eaten' or something. He is convinced, every time,
that my
On 16-Sep-2009, at 12:41, Evan Platt wrote:
Not a 'postfix' answer, but what mail client does he use? Is it one
(or two or 3) e-mail addresses?
No, it's a large number of email addresses and a constantly changing
list.
On 16-Sep-2009, at 13:01, Noel Jones wrote:
you can add a
On 16-Sep-2009, at 14:32, Noel Jones wrote:
@yaho.com @yahoo.com
I can just put that in my normal virtue? That's very cool.
I figured I would need to create a separate virtual file that is
called under smtpd_recipient_restrictions or something.
All seems to work, huzzah!
--
Can I tell
When trying to send a message with 46 recipients in the Bcc I get an
error from my MUA The server mail.covisp.net did not recognize the
recipients.
When I look at the maillog on the server, the only thing I see logged
is:
Sep 15 10:10:20 mail postfix/smtpd[8201]: connect from *home
On 14-Sep-2009, at 04:06, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2009-09-14 Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Ansgar Wiechers:
It appears that Postfix considers addresses beginning with a dash as
invalid:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#allow_min_user
Thanks.
Be sure and take the under-lying warning to
On 13-Sep-2009, at 23:43, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
When you move from Cyrus to something else you can't use a file to
file copy
mechanism, since the Cyrus mailbox format is non-standard.
I am not moving from Cyrus to something else. I have Cyrus SASL
installed for authentication against
On 14-Sep-2009, at 07:48, LuKreme wrote:
against the myself database
The travails of autocorrecting spelling errors. The mysql database.
--
No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one
of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
On 14-Sep-2009, at 08:59, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:52:27PM +1000, Simon Wilson wrote:
And it never succeeds. If I set smtpd_tls_auth_only to no and
disable Use
SSL on the iPhone it auths over SMTP (insecurely) and sends fine.
Sep 14 23:17:59 server04
I am planning on recompiling postfix and all its various helper apps
(switching from cyrus to dovecot, upgrading mysql, Maybe setting up
LDAP, and doing a clean install of FreeBSD latest) onto a newer, and
hopefully more capable machine.
What I want to do is get the new system built and
On 13-Sep-2009, at 18:27, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, LuKreme wrote:
My question is what is the best way to actually migrate the mail and
the users to the new machine without losing mail? WOuld it be a good
idea (or even possible) to run the two machines in parallel for a
time
I've started seeing forged domain name in Message-ID: header: covisp.net
recently when sending from a covisp.net email address. I suspect
that it is the OS X Mail.app generating it's own Message-ID.
What I'd like is to know how I can let postfix know that Message-IDs
from authenticated
please don't reply off- list
On 1-Sep-2009, at 02:48, nunatarsuaq wrote:
2009/9/1 LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
On 31-Aug-2009, at 08:07, nunatarsuaq wrote:
Aug 30 11:46:28 ghost postfix/smtpd[26223]: connect from
ppp-124-122-30-5.revip2.asianet.co.th[124.122.30.5]
WHy are you accepting mail
On 2-Sep-2009, at 05:00, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 02 sep 2009 03:28:20 CEST, Sahil Tandon wrote
ppp-124-122-30-5.revip2.asianet.co.th[124.122.30.5]
WHy are you accepting mail from an obvious DHCP address?
who says this ip is dynamic, just becurse the hostname look like
it is ?
Oh
On 2-Sep-2009, at 10:22, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 02 sep 2009 18:07:27 CEST, LuKreme wrote
who says this ip is dynamic, just becurse the hostname look like
it is ?
Erm don't be naive. If they can't be bothered to have a better
rDNS then I can't be bothered to get their spam.
who
On 2-Sep-2009, at 11:09, Remy Lambert wrote:
I come from the land of MS Exchange so, although I'm competent
I'm not sure one is allowed to use MS Exchange and competent in
the same sentence without a negation.
Only half kidding :)
--
A marriage is always made up of two people who are
what exactly does Cannot find your hostname mean?
NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT from unknown[216.1.201.141]: 450 4.7.1
Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [216.1.201.141];
from=billfzi...@wellmissionstyle.com to=u...@example.com
proto=SMTP helo=mx4.wellmissionstyle.com
;;
On 2-Sep-2009, at 16:46, LuKreme wrote:
what exactly does Cannot find your hostname mean?
Never mind. Found the answer a few seconds after hitting send.
$ host 216.1.201.141
141.201.1.216.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer unite13.ufot.com.
$ host unite13.ufot.com
Host unite13.ufot.com
On 2-Sep-2009, at 20:40, Scott Haneda wrote:
On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
As clearly documented in postconf(5),
How exactly does one get to that man page?
man 5 postconf
--
Did they get you to trade your heroes for ghosts? Hot
ashes for trees? Hot air for a cool
On 2-Sep-2009, at 17:02, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 17:46:38 LuKreme wrote:
The rDNS is wrong, but does reject_unknown_hostname
care about that?
You seem to be confusing several restrictions here.
Actually, I merely typoed. I do not have reject_unknown_hostname
On 31-Aug-2009, at 08:07, nunatarsuaq wrote:
Aug 30 11:46:28 ghost postfix/smtpd[26223]: connect from
ppp-124-122-30-5.revip2.asianet.co.th[124.122.30.5]
WHy are you accepting mail from an obvious DHCP address?
--
and I lift my glass to the Awful Truth / which you can't reveal to
the
On 27-Aug-2009, at 00:16, Stefan Palme wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 18:12 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 26-Aug-2009, at 03:14, Stefan Palme wrote:
user+noduplicate: user+noduplicate
user: user, otheru...@otherdomain.com
Seems to me this would be an ideal use of procmail.
Thanks
On 27-Aug-2009, at 07:31, Stefan Palme wrote:
But does procmail not require a local user account for the recipient
in question? In this machine there are NO normal user accounts.
My procmail delivers to mysql users just fine. The initial setup takes
some extra steps, but that's all.
--
On 26-Aug-2009, at 03:14, Stefan Palme wrote:
user+noduplicate: user+noduplicate
user: user, otheru...@otherdomain.com
Seems to me this would be an ideal use of procmail.
/etc/procmailrc
ARG=$1
:0
* TO_user
{
:0
* ! ARG
{
DROPPRIVS
:0c
On 24-Aug-2009, at 08:28, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
The one bit of spam I'd like to stop, and I seem to remember seeing
talk of it at some point (but I've been unable to find it again) is
the spam appears to be from me to me. That is, the spammers who
use my email address as the from
On 23-Aug-2009, at 17:50, MySQL Student wrote:
I have a user that travels frequently. We have been using
pop-before-smtp, and that's worked well. He now has a Verizon Air
card, and the IP changes faster than the popb4smtp db can keep up
with, so I had to add an entire /24 to mynetworks so he
On 17-Aug-2009, at 03:25, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
The 450 error triggers the spammer to retry sending the mail.
In point of fact, if it is a spammer sending you the mail, a 450 error
is often enough to dissuade them. This is the principle behind
greylisting.
However, if these are real
On 18-Aug-2009, at 07:42, Hilel New wrote:
I can't submit to this list
LIES!
--
When cheese gets its picture taken, what does it say?
After reading (and implementing) http://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html#hangup
I was wondering if there is any reason not to extend this behavior
to 127.0.0.4-8 (the XBL)?
Also, why would I want:
8 rbl_reply_maps = ${stress?hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_reply_maps}
Is there a reason I would
On 26-Jun-2009, at 09:28, Jiří Hlinka wrote:
beside pflogsumm there is postfix-logwatch and amavis-logwatch:
http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/
Sorry for pulling a post out of the wayback machine, but how do people
through multiple logs at posftix-logwatch when they are compressed?
all
I looked at the various rejections for the last 31 days, and I noticed
that my unknown/HELO is very very high and my RBL is very very low.
5xx Reject relay denied 0.08%
5xx Reject HELO/EHLO45.97%
5xx Reject DATA 0.01%
On 16-Aug-2009, at 08:25, Sahil Tandon wrote:
% bzcat /var/log/maillog.*.bz2 | postfix-logwatch
When I did that for 30 days of logs I got a very long pause (20
minutes or so) and then no output at all. I did do it with --detail 1,
but detail 1 for the current log, or for un-piped
301 - 400 of 602 matches
Mail list logo
