On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:29:55 +0300, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com
wrote:
On an Ubuntu Server 12.04 system with Dovecot 2.0.19 I am having some
$ /usr/bin/doveadm pw -u u...@somedomain.com -s DIGEST-MD5
Enter new password: # Here I have typed 12345
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:01:58 +0300, Indiana Jones
indian...@inbox.lv wrote:
# for single address
printf us...@example1.com us...@example2.com\n
/etc/postfix/virtual
# for multiple addresses
printf us...@example1.com us...@example2.com\nus...@example3.com
us...@example4.com\n
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 06:56:13 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
That should be:
us...@example1.com us...@example1.com us...@example2.com
us...@example3.com us...@example3.com us...@example4.com
Makes sense and perhaps it seems obvious for the postfix developers, but
I do
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:32:14 +0300, Indiana Jones
indian...@inbox.lv wrote:
Thank you, but I don't have file /postfix/virtual
What should I do?
Create one?
Use any text editor and create it.
Or, you can try something like this:
# for single address
printf us...@example1.com
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:13:14 -0500, Bill Cole
postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote:
alternative to hooking the MD milter into your main smtpd would be to
define a transport in master.cf running smtpd with MD as a milter,
and use postfix's transport map to route just the one address
Hello list,
I would like to use MimeDefang to sanitize the emails that arrive
at one of our 3 mailing lists, i.e., to convert html-text, remove
unsafe attachments, and remove+webserve file attachments
larger than 500KB.
There are few tutorials on this subject and most, like Mickey Hill's
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:40:41 -0600, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 2/4/2013 4:14 AM, Mark Alan wrote:
I would like to use MimeDefang to sanitize the emails that arrive
at one of our 3 mailing lists, i.e., to convert html-text, remove
unsafe attachments, and remove+webserve
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:10:05 +0200, Muzaffer Tolga Özses
to...@ozses.net wrote:
...
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
inet_interfaces = all
recipient_delimiter = +
relayhost =
You don't need to be re-declaring the postfix default settings again.
Try if the following helps simplifying your
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:43:47 -0500, Paul Schmehl g...@stovebolt.com
wrote:
readme files, but some of this stuff is above my pay grade. I get
confused and am not sure what to do.
In order to benefit from postscreen you need to change both master.cf
and main.cf.
Assuming that you are starting
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 00:33:49 +0200, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 28.07.2012 20:03, schrieb Mark Alan:
The solution is to exempt traffic sent from the machine from the
rate controls.
In 2012, in a server facing the net and running other services
besides mail, I would
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:43:59 +0100, Mark Alan
va...@e-healthexpert.org wrote:
after upgrading to Postfix 2.9.x, using
I am now finding a lot of syslog entries like these:
/var/log/syslog:Jul 27 12:00:32 mx kernel: [485xxx.x] FW
DROP-OUT IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=xx.xxx.xxx.xx DST
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:48:55 +0200, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
Den 2012-07-27 20:43, Mark Alan skrev:
While using Postfix 2.9.3, iptables 1.4.12, under Ubuntu 12.04 LTS,
after upgrading to Postfix 2.9.x, using
suggest here apt-get install shorewall
I am afraid that shorewall
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:42:59 +, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 09:10:34AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Thus, VERP increases the number of parallel connections. This may
result in overflow of state tables in under-powered stateful
routers,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:42:20 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
So, TLSv1.2 is giving trouble.
...
Works with OpenSSL 1.0.1a with smtp_tls_protocols = !TLSv1.2:
...
So it is a good thing that I put out those updates today.
...
Which leaves me wondering how other MTAs
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:07:19 +0100, Mark Alan
va...@e-healthexpert.org wrote:
While the postfix updates do not get into into each distribution
repositories, should we use the following?
postconf -e 'smtpd_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !TLSv1.2'
postconf -e 'smtp_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !TLSv1.2
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:17:17 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Mark Alan:
Would the following be an acceptable way to do it?
postconf -e 'postscreen_access_list = reject'
postconf -e 'soft_bounce = yes'
Only if this is documented. The soft_bounce
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:17:39 -0600, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
You need to set both postscreen_blacklist_action = drop and
soft_bounce = yes. The soft_bounce changes the 521 hangup into a
421 hangup.
Thank you Noel,
If we wanted a mere 4.x.x hangup, it would be more elegant to
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:50:52 +, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:26:42PM +, Mark Alan wrote:
Is there any other way to make the postscreen/postfix
combination temporarily defer all incoming emails with '450
4.3.2 Service currently
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:03:09 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Mark Alan:
/var/log/mail.log:Jan 22 19:09:29 mx postfix-submission/smtpd[2797]:
warning: TLS library problem:2797:error:1408A10B:SSL
routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:wrong version number:s3_srvr.c:771:
Does
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:38:48 -0700, The Doctor
doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Any issues with Berkeley DB 4.7 with current Postfix ?
With:
libdb4.84.8.30
postfix 2.8.5
Each 4 hours we get a lot of:
(...) postfix/postscreen[]: close
database
While using
Ubuntu 10.10
postfix 2.8.5-2
openssl 0.9.8o
Socket Layer (SSL) binary and related cryptographic tools
ii postfix 2.8.5-2~build0.10.10
High-performance
We are getting a few of these:
/var/log/mail.log:Jan 22 19:09:28 mx postfix-submission/smtpd[2797]:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:10:00 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
I found these with: postconf | grep '[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z]:' :-)
postconf | grep '[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z]:' :-) results in:
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `)'
... and at my system man grep refuses to show what
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:04:21 -0500, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
But I'd still be interested in seeing some example postscreen configs
actually in use right now, by you and anyone else willing to share...
This works pretty well:
as root:
## configure Postfix to use
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:19:36 -0600, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
I would classify it as low risk of false positives, and fairly safe.
(but not 100% safe; few rules are. YMMV and such.) I've had a
couple of FP's from idiots that run their business mail servers on a
cablemodem
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:33:44 -0500, Stan Hoeppner
s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Trivial fix: modify the init script to invoke postfix start etc.
instead of directly invoking the master daemon.
I don't believe the current init script directly invokes the master
daemon,
Debian/Ubuntu's
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:45:17 +0200, Stéphane MERLE
stephane.me...@distrigame.com wrote:
(I am using ubuntu 10.04LTS).
I am a little surprised by the fact that I would be using sendmail
#dpkg --get-selections | grep -i sendmail
I got no package installed for sendmail ...
Postfix installs a
On Sun, 22 May 2011 22:00:49 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
Is postfix also the client? What are the settings on that
machine?
Client machines use Claws Mail as MUA (configured to use SMTP at 587)
and those machine have Postfix as the MTA, configured like this:
$ sudo
Hello list,
While using ubuntu 10.10, postfix 2.8.1, dovecot 2.0.12, openssl
0.9.8o, and trying to connect to the mail server via postfix
'submission' the best cipher that I am able to get is
DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)
As it is only the 11th entry in the list showed by
openssl ciphers -v
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:03:29 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
slow unix - - - - - smtp
-o syslog_name=postfix-slow
-o default_destination_rate_delay=1s
-o default_destination_recipient_limit=20
-o
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:03:29 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
slow unix - - - - - smtp
-o syslog_name=postfix-slow
-o default_destination_rate_delay=1s
-o default_destination_recipient_limit=20
-o
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:53:11 -0400, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
/etc/postfix/master.cf
slow unix - - - - - smtp
-o syslog_name=postfix-slow
-o smtp_connection_reuse_time_limit=30s
EOT
/etc/postfix/main.cf
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:39:20 -0400, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
The receiving sites policies are stupid if they don't implement
them sensibly by just returning 4XX responses without penalizing
subsequent transactions.
I am sorry to hijack this thread but we have
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:53:11 -0400, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Why would this be a response to too many recipient commands, a
single message with many recipients is sent over a single connection,
unless you have set an ill-advised destination recipient limit.
All
While using Postfix 2.8.1 + Ubuntu 10.10, after enabling postscreen the
system seems to be working well (sends and receives email without any
apparent problems) but has sporadic errors as shown bellow (without
any other errors or warnings).
sudo grep 'postscreen_cache.db' /var/log/syslog
Mar 10
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 18:46:44 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
In order to have postfix 2.8.1 feeding email to a ezmlm 1.2.17
If you follow the mlmmj website's instructions, then it should
work.
Do you mean the README.Postfix at
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:43:40 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
The basic idea is that with a local aliases
file, file ownership determines the execution privileges for
|command and /file/name destinations, and the envelope sender
address for non-delivery notifications.
Hello list,
In order to have postfix 2.8.1 feeding email to a ezmlm 1.2.17 mailing
list manager (under Debian/Ubuntu) we have a tentative setup that
goes like described bellow.
I have 2 questions:
1. is there a way to do the same without (the rather expensive)
regexp:/ lists?
2. in case of not
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:03:37 +0300, Ejaz me...@cyberia.net.sa wrote:
Postqueue -p command taking so long time to execute, start and
stopping the postfix also the same, in the meanwhile I checked
server performance is quite normal, no load
Is yours /etc/hosts sane?
M.
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:18:39 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
postscreen currently does not implement greylisting - smtpd(8)
currently can do that with policy daemons.
Yes but they do it very late in the process
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
Hello list,
The things that I miss from OpenBSD are spamd and pf (iptables are
almost there).
It seems that postscreen has the potential to, finally, replace spamd.
So, my question is:
How would one configure postscreen's parameters to act like the spamd
defaults, i.e., passtime = 25 m,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:40:16 -0500, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Debian Postfix has significant integration enhancements, dynamic
loading of table drivers, Debian-specific SASL configuration
directory, hostname setting in external file, ... Debian users should
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 22:22:52 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter
p...@state-of-mind.de wrote:
If there are significant differences that are not Debian related
Stefan certainly has had reasons to add them.
That's certainly a way to view things and I respect your opinion.
But it is hard to see the
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:49:38 +0100, Stefan Foerster
cite+postfix-us...@incertum.net wrote:
[chroot disabled]
... and the mysql client libraries
will then try to use the unix socket. This socket is, of course, not
present in the chroot.
Now I know there are better ways around this - use
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:21:39 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Except for all those beginners that get into trouble because they
use someone elses cookbook instructions instead of their own
expertise.
And instead of being continuously consumed by same beginner questions,
Hello,
Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
newest Postfix 2.8?
Regards,
M.
While we do not have Postfix 2.8 (in Debian/Ubuntu) and its postscreen
processor,
Is there someone in this list with experience of using the
Gross greylist app. with Postfix?
Is it stable?
Is it less resource hungry than greyfix or postgrey?
Has it major problems?
Regards,
M.
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:36:26 -0500, Daniel Bromberg
dan...@basezen.com wrote:
Those who can block this, how did you do it? I hope whatever
technique(s) also help block many more like it.
Blocked here with bogofilter (bayesian header+body filter).
M.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:19:48 +0200, Jaques Cochet
jcochet.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm currently using qmail with ezmlm maillist manager. I intent to
move to postfix, and i'm looking for a mail list manager that stores
maillists subscribers in mysql databse, includes posting permissions,
and
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:04:31 +0100, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Le 10/01/2011 10:33, Mark Alan a écrit :
Well then, would the following order make sense?
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = sleep 1,
reject_unlisted_recipient, reject_unauth_pipelining,
reject_invalid_helo_hostname
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 10:17:57 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Jan Johansson:
I have the following config:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks
reject_unauth_destination check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031
For that, specify
While using Postfix 2.7.1 at an Ubuntu 10.10 server:
We disabled ETRN as stated in the 'Configuring the Postfix fast ETRN service'
section of the ETRN_README.html
(...)
smtpd_delay_reject = yes
fast_flush_domains =
mydestination = localhost.localdomain, localhost
mynetworks =
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:49:11 -0600, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
# main.cf
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords = silent-discard, etrn
That works. Problem solved.
Thank you very much Noel.
M.
52 matches
Mail list logo
