At 26 October, 2020 Ron Wheeler wrote:
> If you are very old, you will remember when networking was young and e-mail
> was sent over dial-up connections that connected only once or twice a day.
> The email system has to deal with the historical world where connections
> where not "always on" so
At 17 October, 2020 Demi M. Obenour wrote:
> > Postfix is not an HTTP server handling tens to hundreds of thousands of
> > requests
> > per second, and does not benefit from the optimisations needed for those
> > kinds
> > of workloads. Premature optimisations that sacrifice robustness and
>
2012/3/5 Stanisław Findeisen stf.list.postfix-us...@eisenbits.com:
My bad suspicion is that they are in the process of installing some
(more or less crappy) mail intercepting facility (i.e. to spy on users)
and that this is probably the government who ordered that. This is
Europe (Poland) but
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
how do other people act with such braindead sh**t?
Look into greylisting it. You'll find that greylisting could very
well deal with most of the bots that things like zen.spamhaus.org
would normally deal with. And
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy m...@cloudmark.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:46 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Claudio Prono claudio.pr...@atpss.net wrote:
I have thinked also to this, so i have deleted the .vacation.db, re-do
vacation -I [user] then do
cat 1324286018.V811I1ea270M489235.mail | strace /usr/bin/vacation -t1
testmedia
But no way, no results at all
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Daniel L. Miller dmil...@amfes.com wrote:
We're now using a hosted fax service and receive our faxes via email to a
dedicated address. Is there a method via Postfix I can have these printed
when received? Or do I handle this via mda scripting (at the moment,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Dhanraj Wadhe dhanraj.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing issue
with getting black listed again and again.
Currently we have setup reverse lookup, DKIIM and SPF to avoid getting
listed into rbl's and
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Amira Othman a.oth...@cairosource.com wrote:
Hi all,
I want to configure automatic message but different one for different user.
As I am not using MySQL in my postfix configuration and installation I
didn’t use any other plug-in that may use MySQl too. I am
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 9/19/2011 5:38 PM, john wrote:
I think this is off topic.
I am running Ubuntu 11.04 as a SOHO server with
postfix/dovecot/Amavis-new/Spamassassin/Clamav setup as my email service.
Does anybody know of a
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jon Harris j.har...@digital-ink.co.uk wrote:
Hi List
I don't know if this is possible
It's not. Search the list archives, and there are plenty of people
wanting an API for dropping mail straight into the postfix queue.
I thought if I could generate a
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Clarence Brown clabrown...@gmail.com wrote:
On rare occasions I have had to manually mess around with the mail files, ie
using an editor to remove a corrupt message messing up pop3. There is one
file per user mailbox.
[ ya, no longer on topic for postfix... ]
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Steve Jenkins stevejenk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
This means they broke it (assuming you aren't doing special
processing for Mail.RU etc. destinations).
Agreed. I generally test by sending a
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
The problem is this:
- I cannot connect to the remote SMTP relayhost via plain TCP, it's
firewalled on all ports.
- The relayhost does not offer submission STARTTLS or SSL-wrapped legacy
ports.
- I *can* (and am
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Homer Parker hpar...@homershut.net wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 21:33 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
I disabled greylisting since I started using postscreen and the spam
ratio did
not increase, but the immediacy at which mails from new senders arrive
did.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Thomas Harold thomas-li...@nybeta.com wrote:
On 8/21/2011 10:03 AM, Roger Goh wrote:
There's often problem with our postfix mail server (that runs Cyrus
/ Cyrus-imapd) :
I have scripts (using mutt) to send hourly mails out ( from
another postfix server, I
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
On 08/19/2011 07:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.08.2011 16:05, schrieb Ram:
I dont want to make smtpd connections in the app because that slows down
the app significantly
and also this is a serialized process.
So sending
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Peter Blair popc...@snickers.org:
/Message-Id:\s+(.*?)@my.domain.com/ REPLACE Message-Id:
$1...@my.domain.net
Warning: this might also alter Resent-Message-Id: into Message-Id:!!!
-1s/might
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Jerico2day jerico2...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to have postfix dynamically change my.domain.com only on
Message-Id header to some arbitrary domain that would be
public-facing for all outgoing mail and change it back for incoming
mail.
Unfortunately, I'm
The RFC stipulates that only an A record is required. Mind you, your
/etc/hosts file isn't equivalent to an A record. Configure an
override in your transport file for testing.
Oh, and try not to send HTML mails to mailing lists.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Amira Othman
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Bjron Mork bjron.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I do have the same concerns, is there any way to implement users bases
sending policies through postfix …
Not really. Postfix accepts messages into one of its queues, and will
pick those messages up (depending on its retry
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Stephen Atkins satk...@skircr.com wrote:
My main goal is to figure out what I should have in each section of
main.cf (smptd/client restrictions to help stop spam and not to be a open
relay or back scatter host.
You won't be successful in stopping spam with any
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Amira Othman a.oth...@cairosource.com:
Hi all
I want to send mails to all users I have in my database and I am using
postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6. I am afraid that ISPs consider me spammer and add
me to black
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Sharma, Ashish ashish.shar...@hp.com wrote:
I have a Postfix mail server that needs to be set for two content filters as
I have two content filters.
One from AmaVis and another a custom content filter.
Can you not have amavis feed to your second content
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sharma, Ashish ashish.shar...@hp.com wrote:
Peter,
I don't know how to do it, please post some sample for doing what you are
suggesting.
Read an Amavis document, and instead of pointing it to the postfix
reinjection port, send it to your other content
Well, I see no reason to have a MTA running on a public IP. As stated
above in the thread, as long as your server is HELO'ing out as the
name associated with the PTR record for its SRC-NAT, then you should
be fine.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Martin Schiøtz mali...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I do any outgoing spam checks with postfix or I'm forced to
install lots of Amavis, spamassassin, etc. software to do that job.
I'm sorry to tell you that blocking outbound spam is at least harder
than blocking
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Tashfeen Ekram ga...@rocketmail.com wrote:
I have installed Postfix on Ubuntu to use to only send emails for my rails
application. My rails application is not able to connect to it. Could this
be because sendmail is listeneing at port 20?
also, what
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Oguz Yilmaz oguzyilmazl...@gmail.com wrote:
On my postfix mail server I have RBL definitions at
smtpd_client_restrictions phase. At the moment 2 of 4 rbl's waiting until
tcp timeout without an answer when I try with nslookup.
It sounds like your dns recursor is
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:55 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
Obviously I can't disable the account as it is required, but is there
something that I can do to stop the connections for messages like this:
Return-Path: postmas...@covisp.net
X-Original-To: postmas...@covisp.net
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:28 PM, David A. Gershman
dagershman_...@dagertech.net wrote:
from an external source. I'm trying to see if there is a setting in
master.cf (or other .cf file) which will reject any email from an
external IP (other than my own) *and* is claiming to be from a local
If the exchange server is doing anti-spam analysis, then can't you
setup the exchange server to be a before queue content filter? This
will mean that your postfix server will still do all of the RBL and
recipient checks, but the 5XX series block sent by postfix will be
relayed via postfix to the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Chris Dos ch...@chrisdos.com wrote:
I've been tasked to figure out a way for our three postfix relay servers to
intercept every hard bounced back
e-mail and process it for our web application.
We have about nine servers relaying mail through our three
it to the address in the envelope.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Chris Dos ch...@chrisdos.com wrote:
Peter Blair wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Chris Dos ch...@chrisdos.com wrote:
I've been tasked to figure out a way for our three postfix relay servers to
intercept every hard bounced back
It's easier to do with a src-nat within network gear. But let me tell
you that this is referred to as snowshoeing as it expands your IP
footprint, and is seen in the deliverability world as a slimy thing to
do.
People do it to mitigate the effects of their IP addresses being
blacklisted. But
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Rocco Scappatura
rocco.scappat...@infracom.it wrote:
Thanks Peter,
My aim, anyway, is to apply a such policy for outgoing messages
(including internal-to-internal messages). So I have to define a
group
which contains the IPs enabled for relay through my
I'm certain that you should rephrase that to:
Best way to NOT setup an open relay
Feel free to test your config against:
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
To ensure that your host isn't an open-relay to the Internet (Say hi
to hinet if it is)
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Rich
0/0 is the entire internet.
Take the approach of least privileges. The idea that laptop users VPN
in if they want to be given a free ride (no auth) etc works, since you
can place your VPN subnet into mynetworks.
Perhaps your initial posting was too ambiguous.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:00 PM,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Bokhan Artem art...@academ.org wrote:
Peter Blair пишет:
It's easier to do with a src-nat within network gear.
I understand, I just wanted to know if there is an intelligence way to bind
every ip address its own helo.
Well, you could place a slim smtp proxy
True enough-- but that won't help your HELO matching up with the
reverse of the IP that its bound to.
2009/2/19 Bokhan Artem art...@academ.org:
Peter Blair пишет:
Well, you could place a slim smtp proxy between postfix and the
Internet.
It's easier to write a small tcp server for tcp_table
2009/2/19 Bokhan Artem art...@academ.org:
smtp1 unix - - n - 100 smtp -o
smtp_helo_name=smtpout1.do -o smtp_bind_address=1.1.1.1
smtp2 unix - - n - 100 smtp -o
smtp_helo_name=smtpout2.do -o smtp_bind_address=2.2.2.2
http://stats.dnsbl.com/
As victor said, ZEN is usually enough for most people, but it's always
good to know why you're not using the rest.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Please see below my smtpd_recipient_restrictions. On my rbl client list I
have
Including every solicited bulk email. They usually create unique
bounce addresses to track dead target mailboxes etc.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Michael Katz
mkn...@messagepartners.com wrote:
Ilo Lorusso wrote:
Hi
is their a way I can reject messages when its from address does not
43 matches
Mail list logo
