--On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 5:01 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
Wietse Venema:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Monday, August 29, 2016 10:40 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
> <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
>
> > [An on-line version of this announcement wi
nd 3.x releases?
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
in via
the haproxy or not. ;) I think we'll just need to spin up different MTAs
that the haproxy points to, and then move our MX record, and move
everything off the direct connections.
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Manager, Systems Team
Zimbr
re any ability to support a mixed mode, where some clients are coming
in via an upstream proxy and some are not?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Manager, Systems Team
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
A division of S
--On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 11:08 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
I added an IP to the postscreen blacklist, but it still gets passed to
SMTPD?
Never mind, blacklist action was set to ignore instead of enforce... Fixed.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Pl
elo=
zimbra@edge02e:~$ postconf postscreen_access_list
postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks,
cidr:/opt/zimbra/conf/postfix/postscreen_blacklist
zimbra@edge02e:~$ cat /opt/zimbra/conf/postfix/postscreen_blacklist
10.43.0.41 reject
10.43.0.188 reject
I also stop postfix, deleted the postscreen
rictions" I
could use. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Manager, Systems Team
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
A division of Synacor, Inc
/conf$ cat tag_as_originating.re
/^/ FILTER smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10026
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Manager, Systems Team
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
A division of Synacor, Inc
--On Wednesday, April 06, 2016 1:23 PM -0500 Noel Jones
<njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> wrote:
On 4/6/2016 10:52 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, April 06, 2016 6:36 PM +0200 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com>:
Is any
--On Wednesday, April 06, 2016 6:36 PM +0200 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com>:
Is anyone familiar with this RBL and its quality? Not a whole lot
of info at <http://bad.psky.me/about/>. Terms seem probably ok
<http://ba
Is anyone familiar with this RBL and its quality? Not a whole lot of info
at <http://bad.psky.me/about/>. Terms seem probably ok
<http://bad.psky.me/terms/>.
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in
--On Friday, April 01, 2016 11:36 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Thursday, March 31, 2016 9:15 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
Is this a known issue with Barracuda? Anyone have an idea how to work
around this? Clearly havin
t take any actions. And yet, here we see
a significant behavior change.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
A division of Synacor, Inc
Clearly having their spam appliance be non-functional isn't a
great start. ;)
I think I'd choose Barracuda OR postscreen, not sure how both of them
together could be useful?
Dunno. :)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leade
around this? Clearly having their spam appliance be non-functional isn't a
great start. ;)
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
A division of Synacor, Inc
ves up returning -DNO_DB. makedefs does not even try to run a actual
test, it seems. but like the problem below, if it is running a 32 bit
test, it wont link with a 64 bit library
Sounds like a good time to ditch BDB for LMDB. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Archi
--On Monday, October 07, 2013 3:16 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Monday, October 07, 2013 6:07 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
Note, the new "%" substitution pattern for a comma-separated
list of DC= componen
tainly keeps things flowing smoothly. It also allows for things like
upgrading an LDAP server w/o worrying about the rest of the infrastructure
falling over.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
A division of Synacor, Inc
AP map parameters to define a
health-check for that.
OpenLDAP has a parameter for that where it will not answer queries if it is
currently refreshing. It would probably make more sense to set that
instead?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 6:14 AM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Monday, February 08, 2016 8:00 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount:
>> In Postfix > 3.0.x, the value from pos
h is "ipv4" as the default.
I realize I don't use mynetworks the way you probably anticipated. ;) I've
redone my build so that it behaves the way I need it to work.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in ope
--On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 8:56 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 11:00 AM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
The "inet_protocols" setting is not covered by this, because it hasn't
changed.
BT
t sorted out. I was thinking the old default was host,
not subnet, so had the logic reversed. ;)
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
A division of Synacor, Inc
--On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 12:36 PM -0500 Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
On Feb 9, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com>
wrote:
Even after setting the style to "host", it still generates the incorrect
netmask:
[zimbra@zr
--On Monday, February 08, 2016 8:00 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
In Postfix > 3.0.x, the value from postconf mynetworks returns incorrect
netmask values, and it is missing IPv6 entirely:
This depends on the inet_protocols setting.
#
Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:fe8f:cbcd/64 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: fc00:10:137:242::53/64 Scope:Global
loLink encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson
--On Saturday, January 09, 2016 9:06 AM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
Amavis passes it back to Postfix on port 25, and boom, the sasl bits are
called, even though no auth is involved.
If you know that an SMTP daemon will not receive AUTH co
The forwarding is in zimbraMailForwardingAddress
This would block multiple expansions. Does that seem correct?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 12:46 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 3:43 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
I think I mentioned in this thread that the patch is not complete
because the Cyrus implementa
emails shoudl be blocked by postfix. If that isn't
happening, then I'd be concerned.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:49 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Thursday, December 10, 2015 2:29 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Thursday, December 10, 2015 2:02 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie..
ress only.
Yep. We're working on completing it. ;) It just had some unanticipated
side effects.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
s.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
t to investigate migrating to lmdb instead of hash dbs.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
inclusion in a
postfix build?
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Saturday, December 19, 2015 2:40 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:58:30PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
However, when doing "make install" a few of these do not end up being
installed:
posttls-finger
qmqp-sink
the email proxy portion of their product (IMAP,
POP, SMTP), I'd definitely avoid it. I.e., I would not recommend nginx as
a solution in front of postfix to anyone.
*<https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?29,252772,253147>
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
-
--On Monday, December 14, 2015 6:03 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:36:33AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Given nginx's complete disregard for RFC's (*) and unwillingness to
examine or fix issues related to the email proxy p
(or if it
causes new ones).
We are using this patch in our dev lab with postfix 3.0.3. So far, no
problems have arisen, and it is helping us with resolving an issue we had
with tracking originating IPs. Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
---
--On Thursday, December 10, 2015 2:29 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Thursday, December 10, 2015 2:02 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> This is not completely trivial because the port information needs
>
o know. Is there any general timeline on when that will be
available for testing?
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
trigger it every few weeks.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
et-gid
write permissions.
Thanks. Was more just trying to understand the cause than blaming the
messenger. ;) Now I have a good avenue to pursue.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
.
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Thursday, December 10, 2015 2:45 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:35 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
<wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
If some breakage is specific to one software distribution, then I
would investigate the
o scan the same
content multiple times.
Hi Viktor,
Thanks for the reply! I've been on vacation so catching up on email. It
sounds like the better solution then is to add:
-o default_destination_recipient_limit=5000
to the content filter definitions? ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibso
--On Monday, November 30, 2015 7:00 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
I've always (since ~2001) used large recipient limits with filter
transports, this also improves efficiency, no need to scan the same
content multiple times.
Hi Viktor,
Thanks for the reply!
--On Monday, November 30, 2015 3:01 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Monday, November 30, 2015 2:56 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Monday, November 30, 2015 7:00 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wr
--On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:03 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:11:39PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Monday, November 30, 2015 3:08 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote
--On Monday, November 30, 2015 3:08 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
Either default_destination_recipient_limit has to be bumped up via
postconf, or -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings requires
setting to resolve this so far.
Hm, so according to our c
--On Monday, November 30, 2015 2:56 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Monday, November 30, 2015 7:00 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
I've always (since ~2001) used large recipient limits with filter
transports, this also improve
. I've been reading over the docs, and it seems
that this is a bit aggressive. However, it does seem that at least some
set of these options should be set. I believe it is only necessary to set
"no_address_mappings". Does that seem correct?
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Moun
l poke at
my other SSL/TLS settings and see if I can track down why OpenSSL is
unhappy now.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
.4
Setting lmtp_tls_security_level to none allows mail delivery to succeed.
--Quana
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Sunday, November 22, 2015 6:49 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
Setting lmtp_tls_security_level to none allows mail delivery to succeed.
Setting lmtp_tls_CApath fixed this (although that wasn't necessary in
2.11.4). Sorry for the noise. :)
--Quanah
--
--On Monday, November 23, 2015 3:36 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 07:29:56PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Monday, November 23, 2015 3:13 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
>> Setti
/32585111/>.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
ount is unlocked.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Wednesday, October 07, 2015 11:07 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:52:36PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> What would help is putting the "check_sasl_access" table in SQL.
>
>> I should've s
s" an
auth for every one of the emails sent out over the persistent connection,
even thought they actually only have auth'd when initially opening the
connection.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open
--On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:00 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
Hi Viktor,
We've been able to start testing this patch. So far, it is working as
expected.
It has continued to hold up through more extensive testing. Will this make
it into Postfix 3.1 or the next
--On Tuesday, June 02, 2015 5:26 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:00 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
Hi Viktor,
We've been able to start testing this patch. So far, it is working as
expected
. The version I downloaded at that
time has a timestamp of:
# Postfix PCRE bot spam killer
#
# Updated 10/2/2014
#
If you want a copy, let me know.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Monday, January 27, 2014 6:46 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 2:40 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:02:45AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
The patch below may not even compile
http://www.postfix.org/postscreen.8.html
Says that postscreen_dnsbl_timeout is available in Postfix 2.11 or later.
This is not correct. It is in postfix 3.0 and later.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source
--On Thursday, February 26, 2015 12:17 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:03:52PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:17 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
--- Editorial
to get this lookup to succeed AND have it then go
through SRS. Is something like:
sender_canonical_maps = proxy:ldap:/opt/zimbra/conf/ldap-scm.cf,
lmdb:/etc/postfix/pfix-no-srs.cf, tcp:127.0.0.1:10001
Workable?
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc
--On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 4:17 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
We're looking to implement SRS support along the lines of
https://www.mind-it.info/forward-postfix-spf-srs/. The primary issue
I see when looking at this is we already have
---
It would not surprise me at all if this were set up incorrectly to start
with back in postfix 2.0, and has simply been pushed forward ever since.
I'll file a bug to re-examine the use of sender canonical maps here.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc
address of char...@bbc.com configured. So
alice sends email to bob, and bob returns as being forwarded to charlie.
I.e., our MTA sends it on to bbc.com because of forwarding being configured
for bob.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc
--On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:55 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
Imagine al...@example.com e-mails b...@zimbra.com, but bob has set up
e-mail forwarding to char...@bbc.com
al...@example.com - b...@zimbra.com - char...@bbc.com
Standard scenario
will result
in automatic failure (This issue was raised by one of our clients who ran
into this problem after enabling address_verify_map be used).
I would think the default values should not include unsupported database
formats.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc
--On Thursday, January 15, 2015 4:43 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
Hi,
I see on http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html, it
recommends using a btree database for the address verify map. For
example:
# Default setting
is a
suitable replacement for btree (and request a doc update if that is
correct).
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
is trimmed down significantly, but you can get the idea. There's
no reason such a thing couldn't be processed as an ordered value. If you
were trying to store it in a multi-valued LDAP attribute, that would be
problematic, since return order is not guaranteed.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On November 19, 2014 at 7:40:07 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:07:19PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Sorry, the login table lookup must handle the original address as
the lookup key via a single query.
And clearly
theoretically then, I'd assume I
could then just use two ldap maps... One to do the domain rewrite, the
second to look up where to deliver.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
this:
zimbraMailCatchAllForwardingAddress: @zre-ldap003.eng.zimbra.com
which is set on the alias domain.
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
to proceed.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
is the postfix piece to utilize LDAP.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
table lookup must handle the original address as
the lookup key via a single query.
And clearly postfix is already designed in some cases to do multiple
queries based on the results of previous queries.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra
is aliased to. And even if it did, what address should it look
up in the sender login map? foo? bar? baz? All three of them? And
what if the client sends mail from bar?
They're required to use user@domain for the login. There won't be an issue
of foo vs bar vs baz.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson
--On November 19, 2014 at 11:14:49 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:07:19PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Sorry, the login table lookup must handle the original address as
the lookup key via a single query.
And clearly postfix
for their outgoing bulk mailings so as not to impact the more critical
functions.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
We've had one request so far for RFC 6710 support with Zimbra. Just
curious if there are any plans on the table for implementation of this RFC
within Postfix for 2.12 (or later).
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra
on
traffic patterns, but it overall does indicate to me that securing the
smtpd layer is of importance to a number of organizations.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
to the clients. I'm guessing what they really just
want is encrypted SMTPD, which as you note, can work just fine with any
valid certificate setup.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
.pem
-o smtpd_tls_key_file=domain2.key
10.0.0.103:25 inet . . . smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_cert_file=domain3.pem
-o smtpd_tls_key_file=domain3.ky
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
listed. You list zen first, so
it is tested first. If it gets rejected by that RBL, then there is no
reason to evaluate any further RBLs.
Thus if you see anything being blocked by something other than zen, it
means it isn't in the zen list, but is listed elsewhere.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson
Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
=jchzfsrgvu
pflogsumm don't count postscreen RBL rejects
already using pflogsumm-1.1.5.tar.gz Beta
sadly mailgraph and logwatch also hide them :-(
If you file a bug for postfix-logwatch with the pertinent info, I'll see
what I can do about adding it.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server
--On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:05 AM +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 23:42 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:12 PM +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Aug 25 14:55:15 mail-gw postfix/postscreen[29302]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from [119.75.11.68]:53210: 550
as 8AD091212CC
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
by user testus...@zre-ldap003.eng.zimbra.com
So I'll need to debug that next. :)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Thursday, August 14, 2014 3:32 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
235 2.7.0 Authentication successful
mail from:testus...@zre-ldap003.eng.zimbra.com
250 2.1.0 Ok
rcpt to:testus...@zre-ldap002.eng.zimbra.com
553 5.7.1 testus...@zre-ldap003.eng.zimbra.com: Sender address
address rejected:
not owned by user testus...@zre-ldap003.eng.zimbra.com
quit
;)
I was trying both with and without them just to ensure it wasn't something
stupid about the 's. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader
=reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch is not
a configuration we officially support anyway. Once I have it configured
per our supported bits (doing lookups out of ldap) it behaves correctly.
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra
;
foreach $file (@files) {
unlink $file
}
foreach $prev (@preserve) {
($name, $junk) = split(/.3.0.$so.so/,$prev,2);
$fullname = $name..so.3.0.$so;
symlink($fullname, $dir/$name.so);
}
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra
for use by SpamAssassin.
I've been (slowly) hacking up a LMDB version of the Bayes DB for SA, but I
keep having to defer that for other work. So someone else may beat me to
it.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open
.
This is one reason there has been a movement to replace BDB with LMDB in a
number of software packages.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
