and the sending server.
What may be helpful to troubleshoot this is if you can get your domain
mail queue log from the sending server to let you know why they are
stuck in a sending loop.
--
Randy Saeks
Network Manager
Glencoe School District 35
@rsaeks
kazabe <mailto:kaz...@gmail.com>
Fe
Thank you, everyone. I added in the space to have the filter be formatted:
/^Received: from foo.domain/
and that has been working. I also added in the other two just to be safe in
case the first didn't catch it.
I appreciate the help!
Randy
- Original Message -
From: Viktor Dukhovni
does trigger so I'm guessing there is something
simple with the syntax I am missing.
Would anyone have some tips on something else to try to help? Thank you very
much!
Randy Saeks
District Network Manager
Glencoe School District 35
twitter: @rsaeks
On 01/07/2013 07:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Randy Ramsdell:
What is the configuration forces postfix to honor what is found in
virtual_alias_maps ?
e.g.
support@$domain.com LocalAccount
It does.
However, the local(8) delivery agent case-folds recipient names
What is the configuration forces postfix to honor what is found in
virtual_alias_maps ?
e.g.
support@$domain.com LocalAccount
Thanks.
On 09/26/11 16:12, Wietse Venema wrote:
Randy Ramsdell:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On 09/26/11 14:36, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/26/2011 1:31 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
On 09/26/11 14:18, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/26/2011 1:00 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
On 09/22/11 13:45
On 09/27/11 09:33, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/27/2011 8:03 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
/etc/postfix/virtual:
#f...@example.com stays itself.
f...@example.comf...@example.com
#b...@example.com goes elsewhere.
b...@example.comother@elsewhere
/etc/postfix
On 09/22/11 13:45, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I cannot find the the way to grab all to's rewritten to go to a
single to:. We need to send all mail coming out of our QA
environment and send that to a single, probably, local address. The
list of senders will be in the thousands and so using
On 09/26/11 14:18, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/26/2011 1:00 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
On 09/22/11 13:45, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I cannot find the the way to grab all to's rewritten to go to a
single to:. We need to send all mail coming out of our QA
environment and send that to a single, probably
On 09/26/11 14:36, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/26/2011 1:31 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
On 09/26/11 14:18, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/26/2011 1:00 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
On 09/22/11 13:45, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I cannot find the the way to grab all to's rewritten to go to a
single to:. We need
On 09/22/11 16:33, Wietse Venema wrote:
Randy Ramsdell:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
/etc/postfix/virtual:
# All example.com users become mails...@example.net.
@example.com mails...@example.net
# Except for f...@example.com
On 09/23/11 13:35, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Please disregard. Typo but I doubt you've seen the last issue regarding
this configuration. :)
will also select a few to's where we send these off as normal.
No external to our network mail we need to be routed.
So far I read about transport maps and the address rewriting but don't
see a way or the best way to accomplish this.
Advice appreciated,
Randy Ramsdell
On 09/22/11 15:51, Wietse Venema wrote:
Randy Ramsdell:
I cannot find the the way to grab all to's rewritten to go to a single
to:. We need to send all mail coming out of our QA environment and
send that to a single, probably, local address. The list of senders will
be in the thousands and so
Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
well worth what they charge.
Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I am trying to configure a very selective list on who can send to a
certain local accounts ( could be many and currently contains maybe 30 ).
Currently, this is covered by:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix/protected_lists
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I am trying to configure a very selective list on who can send to a
certain local accounts ( could be many and currently contains maybe 30 ).
Currently, this is covered by:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix
I am trying to configure a very selective list on who can send to a
certain local accounts ( could be many and currently contains maybe 30 ).
Currently, this is covered by:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
/dev/rob0 wrote:
As you can see, sendmail does not appear ... How can I fix it?
This could be ugly. Installation from source, even correctly done,
interferes with OS features like this alternatives thing. It is
well worth your while to spend some time learning how properly to
manage your
Steve Jenkins wrote:
I saw this in my maillog just now:
Apr 15 09:03:00 carbonfiber postfix/qmgr[28665]: 53D87104259C:
from=shoppers_cent...@olepykorin.info, size=16858, nrcpt=1 (queue
active)
Apr 15 09:03:01 carbonfiber amavis[28076]: (28076-20) Blocked
BAD-HEADER, [50.22.180.134]
Hi,
I am trying to block all mail going to a certain domain. We use
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix/protected_lists
and it counterpart:
smtpd_restriction_classes = list_blocks
list_blocks = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/list_members,reject
The
Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/12/2011 8:28 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to block all mail going to a certain domain. We use
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix/protected_lists
and it counterpart:
smtpd_restriction_classes = list_blocks
list_blocks
Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/12/2011 10:12 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/12/2011 8:28 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to block all mail going to a certain domain. We
use
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix/protected_lists
Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi There,
How do you gather statistics for messages delivered and processed via
Postfix (both inbound and outbound)? For instance, to show on a daily
basis, how many messages we have received from each domain, how many
messages we have delivered to each domain, etc.
I have
Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/12/2011 10:41 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
Sorry, this is simply related to file format it appears.
Ah! A question!
Well, not really.
main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix/protected_lists
protected_lists
Wietse Venema wrote:
Randy Ramsdell:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
Apr 8 10:10:30 atlbl6 postfix/qmgr[11959]: warning: connect to transport
private/retry: Connection refused
grep retry /etc/postfix
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:02:47AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Argh, I ran postfix upgrade-configuration but not set-permissions. When I
do add the set-permissions argument, there is an error for README_FILES.
postfix upgrade-configuration set-permissions
chown
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Now I am on dict_mysql.so. So I stalled postfix-mysql, now exiting for
pqsql.
Is there a way to edit a configuration so the program skips certain
features?
No, you need to fix all the problems. It seems
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:43:38PM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49:00AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Okay every single man page, and there are MANY, is also causing an error.
This are all related to opensuse's postfix
Dennis Guhl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:04:46PM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
[..]
What is the postfix-files that list say postmap.1 vs.
If you take a peek at postfix.1 you will see a section FILES. There
you can find the files referenced in this man page, including the
postfix-files
Apr 8 10:10:30 atlbl6 postfix/qmgr[11959]: warning: connect to
transport private/retry: Connection refused
This is a new postfix server Version: 2.7.2-12.3 opensuse 11.4
Where would I begin to troubleshoot this?
RCR
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
Apr 8 10:10:30 atlbl6 postfix/qmgr[11959]: warning: connect to transport
private/retry: Connection refused
grep retry /etc/postfix/master.cf
what do you see?
# grep retry /etc
Mark Moellering wrote:
I am new to postfix. I have it set it up with dovecot on a unix box :
postfix 2.8 on freebsd 8.1
While it tests fine under Thunderbird (and kde-mail), I currently can't
send mail via Windows Live, although I can receive it.
I have been looking at the log files. This
mouss wrote:
Le 13/03/2011 17:57, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez a écrit :
Hi everyone.
I'm sending this email because I'm looking for a reference regarding smtp
attacks, this is because I'm working to create some smtp signatures for the
snort solution.
It's not directly with snort, I'm
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Randy Ramsdell put forth on 3/8/2011 3:57 PM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
FYI, the PBL isn't limited to dynamic listings. Many corporations add
their unused IP space to the PBL, along with other IPs within their
netblocks that shouldn't be sending direct mail. They do
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 04:05:18PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix uses the inode number in the name, because the name needs
to be unique across the incoming, active, and deferred directories.
Postfix could lengthen the time before reuse, by including more
time
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Dennis Guhl put forth on 3/8/2011 11:52 AM:
If you are blocked because of Spamhaus' PBL you are on an consumer
dial up (http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/)
FYI, the PBL isn't limited to dynamic listings. Many corporations add
their unused IP space to the PBL, along with
mouss wrote:
Le 01/03/2011 11:25, Matthias Andree a écrit :
Am 28.02.2011 23:57, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
The main issue I see at the moment really is the inability to legally
link Postfix to MySQL, removing a valuable piece of Postfix functionality.
Not a loss. If MySQL and Postfix
Islam, Towhid wrote:
I am trying to set up a mail system with postfix being the core (smtp)
and dovecot for imap/pop3 for end-user mail delivery/retrieval. While I
have configured spam and virus scanning for my postfix based mail relay
hosts, I’m not sure how to incorporate amavisd (for
Wietse Venema wrote:
I added the following entry to the wip.html file on the Postfix website.
Wietse
Trickle attack defense
The postscreen daemon, available with Postfix 2.8 and later, already
implements time limits to receive one complete SMTP command line.
Postscreen uses a default
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
I added the following entry to the wip.html file on the Postfix website.
Wietse
Trickle attack defense
The postscreen daemon, available with Postfix 2.8 and later, already
implements time limits to receive one complete SMTP command line
Cameron Smith wrote:
Hello,
I have a VPS with postfix as my MTA.
vps.sweetwise.com http://vps.sweetwise.com
My MX is handled by another remote server and mail accounts for my
domain are configured there.
sweetwise.com http://sweetwise.com. 3600 IN MX 0 smtp.secureserver.net
Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
On 11/01/11 16:34, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
On 2011-01-11 at 16:25:38 +, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
So have my entire email system run on 2 boxes alone? What if the
postfix box were to go down? What if the Dovecot box were to go
down? In my solution, if a box (or VM
this?
Thanks,
Randy Ramsdell
Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/21/2010 11:37 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
It appears mycingular ( iphone ) ips are listed on spamhaus (
XBL and PBL ) for 8 days.
Yes, they should be listed.
Why should they? They have mail servers too. I just don't get this.
I have reject at the smtpd level
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:37:24PM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
It appears mycingular ( iphone ) ips are listed on spamhaus ( XBL and PBL )
for 8 days. I have reject at the smtpd level if found. So my users are
complaining and I am stuck on the phone with ATT to get
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 01:01:25PM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Yes, they should be listed.
Why should they? They have mail servers too. I just don't get this.
The individual phones sending directly to your MX host should be
black-listed. The ISP's outbound SMTP
Matt Hayes wrote:
On 12/13/2010 9:31 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
How would you store a CC of all mailings relayed through postfix, sent
by our users. We have plenty of logs but they dont tell us if someone
sends spam and how much, so that we may reprimand the user early before
ending up on spam lists.
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 12/14/10 4:04 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Matt Hayes wrote:
BCC'ing all of your user's email is unethical IMHO. Scan outgoing and
incoming email for spam; done. That way you aren't compromising your
users' private information nor possible security to your clients
Avinash Pawar wrote:
Hello,
I am getting the following error whenever try to send email to gmail :
connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
http://alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.79.27]: Connection timed
out (port 25)
And for rediff :
connect to mx.rediffmail.rediff.akadns.net
Trigve Siver wrote:
From: Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru
To: Trigve Siver trig...@yahoo.com
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 10:08:04 AM
Subject: Re: Empty From when generating bounce
07.12.2010 11:21, Trigve Siver wrote:
[]
yes I know but I'm not in charge of
Hi,
I am going to have to implement something that drops rejected mail from
one of our aliases.
The scenario is that we forward to a external server and cannot match
its spam/UCE rules so our server backskatters mail.
One way would be to drop all rejects. I think this will work because our
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Randy Ramsdell rramsd...@activedg.com:
Hi,
I am going to have to implement something that drops rejected mail
from one of our aliases.
The scenario is that we forward to a external server and cannot match
its spam/UCE rules so our server backskatters
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 03:01:45PM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
So to rephrase, what would be the best practices way given I have to do
forward this email and am powerless to change the design other than our
setup which may only include trying to mitigate backskatter
Len Conrad wrote:
Len Conrad:
At 09:12 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
Len Conrad:
The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
I've moved the 2176
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:05:12PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
I also noticed the number of TCP connections by *ss -s *command
Whenever it goes beyond 900 then mail sending speed is 5-6 mails per second.
When the connections are below 900 then the mail sending
Chris G wrote:
I have a small SoHo network of machines and I have postfix installed on
most of them for sending mail. The machines sit behind a NAT router
which connects them to the internet, the domain name (as seen from the
outside world) is zbmc.eu. All the machines are running xubuntu
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 08:43:07PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
The fallback relays MUST be loop-free. Thus machine4 must NOT forward
back to machine1.
I was assuming that at least one machine CAN send mail :)
Your assumption is unwarranted, and fails to take into
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:32:00PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
When all links are down, you have a loop
1-2-3-4-5-2-3-4-5
going at local network speeds.
But at least this will end really quickly :)
Mail should queue, not loop and bounce.
But what
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I have SPF setup and Postfix is rejecting mail from explicitly
unauthorized servers. If a customer wants me to customize the
configuration so that they can receive mail from that server, is that
wrong? Their current SPF TXT record contains a hard fail as ...
v=spf1
appreciate any help.
Try:
$ telnet your.host.name smtp
from a different machine. You may need to update a firewall rule
before Postfix can receive mail from outside.
Wietse
Is it even bound to an ip other than 127.0.0.1?
Randy Ramsdell
Vasya Pupkin wrote:
Hello.
First, I have spent two days reading articles and searching web for
solution but failed there. I am using postfix as an mx for my domains,
it accpets mail for different addresses withing my domains which is
then forwarded to other external domains, i.e. google.com and
mouss wrote:
Simone Caruso a écrit :
Il 19/07/2010 22:04, Jonathan Tripathy ha scritto:
On 19/07/10 18:07, Angelo Amoruso wrote:
On 16/07/2010 10.10, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have set up a mail server (on a VM) as per this article:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Randy put forth on 3/24/2010 3:55 PM:
dig -x 208.43.143.111
;; ANSWER SECTION:
111.143.43.208.in-addr.arpa. 3600 INPTR
208.43.143.111-static.reverse.softlayer.com.
Your problem isn't the Exchange server per se. Your problem is that you're
forwarding spam
a high
deliverability ratio. I am not willing to give the name of the
organisation so you will have to take my word for it.
We do this by using multiple postfix configs/queues as in postfix{1-5}
with each binding to its own ip.
Thanks,
Randy Ramsdell
seems to have
rules to catch them.
Also it appears that some of these connections don't use helo and it
this is important information to help with this, I will provide those.
Can anyone offer suggestions?
Thanks,
Randy Ramsdell
Wietse Venema wrote:
Sean Reifschneider:
On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
EX:
r...@theholycat.com: Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
reply to RCPT TO command))
I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
would connect to the Exchange
Fabio Viero wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Scott Haneda talkli...@newgeo.com wrote:
On May 13, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Fabio Viero wrote:
I need to do something like this:
Someone sends an e-mail to u...@domain.com
Someone gets a reply from postfix saying User has moved to
Christian Desrochers wrote:
Hi all,
My office will be closed for the Christmas holidays and I would like
to set up an mail autoresponder that will send back a notice to the
sender for every mail sent at @our_domain.com http://our_domain.com.
What I really want is to reply to sender saying
schema you come up with
using mysql.
Randy Ramsdell
filesystem for your needs, what is the true
bandwidth you are seeing currently? What is your iowait? I bet it isn't
really isn't that much overall where reiserfs vs ext3 vs whatever will
make a huge improvement.
Thanks,
Randy Ramsdell
mouss wrote:
Joey a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Zbigniew Szalbot
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 12:06 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Finally blocking some spam
I am still using spamhaus at the RBL
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:31:40PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a server with several public IP addresses (aliases on one
network card), running Postfix.
The machine also runs several websites, which interact with the
users
73 matches
Mail list logo
