:18 PM Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:58:45PM +0000, Travis Dolan wrote:
>
> > content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
>
> There's your problem. Your content filter is too slow, it is
> probably doing remot
= permit_mynetworks,reject
127.0.0.1:10025/inet/smtpd_restriction_classes =
127.0.0.1:10025/inet/smtpd_sender_restrictions =
127.0.0.1:10025/inet/smtpd_soft_error_limit = 1001
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> Tra
org>
wrote:
>
> > On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Travis Dolan <travis.do...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I am working from the following data
> >
> > qshape deferred = TOTAL 10
> > qshape -s deferred = TOTAL 9
> >
> > qshape active = TO
.
You mentioned clocks, that could be a potential issue. The sending server
in this case is UTC, and the receiving server is PST. How would this
manifest itself?
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:56 AM Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> Travis Dolan:
> > Th
ustom smtp
transport open, and messages fly off my server. The bottle neck does not
seem to be on the receiver, it seems to be the active queue on the sending
host.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:44 AM Travis Dolan <travis.do...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Unfortunately there are many MTAs/MUAs that sen
smtp transport destination.
There must be a way to requeue messages in my active queue faster.
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:14 AM Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Travis Dolan:
> > > The destination server has no issue wit
I have 1000's of messages in my active queue destined for a single host.
This is noticeably slowing down the delivery of messages to other
destinations/users.
I have created a custom smtp transport for the host responsible for all the
messages in my queue. I have then tweaked the following for
like this...
--
http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
The United States is an Obama Nation.
If you are a spammer, please email j...@subspacefield.org to get blacklisted.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 03:36:01PM +0400, Nikita Kipriyanov wrote:
Travis wrote:
There are wrong permissions on saslauthd socket. From
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html :
IMPORTANT: saslauthd usually establishes a UNIX domain socket in
/var/run/saslauthd and waits for authentication
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:32:50PM +0200, mouss wrote:
Travis wrote:
[snip]
-- basics --
Postfix: 2.3.8
System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 \n \l
[snip]
-- listing of /usr/lib/sasl2 --
total 116
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 7 22:47 .
drwxr-xr-x 60 root root 20480 Sep 28 02:03 ..
-rw-r
/virtual_alias_maps
--
Crypto ergo sum. http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
Truth does not fear scrutiny or competition, only lies do.
If you are a spammer, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get blacklisted.
on localhost --
-- end of saslfinger output --
--
Crypto ergo sum. http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
Truth does not fear scrutiny or competition, only lies do.
If you are a spammer, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get blacklisted.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:15:24AM +0200, mouss wrote:
Travis wrote:
I also notice that even though the SSL keys have passwords on them,
postfix never prompts for them.
daemons do not prompt.
Perhaps they should not, but apache does. Dovecot has a config file
entry with the password
/virtual_alias_maps
--
Crypto ergo sum. http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/
Truth does not fear scrutiny or competition, only lies do.
If you are a spammer, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get blacklisted.
14 matches
Mail list logo
