Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:52:57 -0500
Von: Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: DNS RBL error
On 4/19/2010 8:22 PM, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:03:51 -0400
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
Apr 19 08:21:48 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21485]: warning:
130.60.141.41.zen.spamhaus.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name not
found. Name
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
You might have been blocked because you exceeded the limits for free
usage.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any problems ?
You might have been blocked because you
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
I certainly do not want to exceed any limits, how do i avoid that ?
Well, how big is your server?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 |
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:53:03 -0400
donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems
it's not resolving. at
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
I certainly do not want to exceed any limits, how do i avoid that ?
Well, how big is your server?
oh it's about this high - - -
j/k
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
This should well be within the limits. We're execeeding the limit at
about 30k users. Maybe you're using your ISPs DNS forwarder?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT |
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:58 AM, John Peach wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:53:03 -0400
donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
This should well be within the limits. We're execeeding the limit at
about 30k users. Maybe you're using your ISPs
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
This should well be within the limits. We're execeeding the limit
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:09:38 -0400
donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about
2000 users.
This should well be
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
this system in question picks up mail ( primary MX ) for about 2000 users.
This should
* John Peach post...@johnpeach.com:
Your nslookup shows you using 207.172.3.20 as a nameserver:
20.3.172.207.in-addr.arpa name = auth1.dns.rcn.net
Your ISP's nameserver. You need to run your own, so that you query
spamhaus directly. They are counting all the hits from RCN.
apt-get
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
ins2:~ root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
search beth.k12.pa.us
nameserver 10.135.1.2
nameserver 209.96.96.2
nameserver 207.172.3.20
ins2:~ root# nslookup zen.spamhaus.org
Server: 207.172.3.20
Address:207.172.3.20#53
** server can't
On 19 Apr 2010, at 14:53, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
i have been seeing tons of errors coming from spamhaus, it seems it's not
resolving. at least for me. is anyone else having any
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:31:19AM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
abuseat.org is working fine. I'm only having trouble with zen.
Apr 19 08:29:12 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21642]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[117.201.68.108]: 554 Service unavailable; Client host
[117.201.68.108] blocked
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:36 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:31:19AM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
abuseat.org is working fine. I'm only having trouble with zen.
Apr 19 08:29:12 mail2 postfix/smtpd[21642]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[117.201.68.108]: 554 Service
donovan jeffrey j:
by the time i typed this email. i got an authoritative answer;
dns:~ root# nslookup 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
Server: 209.96.96.2
Address:209.96.96.2#53
You should do such tests as a non-root user. Postfix does not query
the DNS as root.
Wietse
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
donovan jeffrey j:
by the time i typed this email. i got an authoritative answer;
dns:~ root# nslookup 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
Server: 209.96.96.2
Address:209.96.96.2#53
You should do such tests as a non-root user.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 01:09:28PM -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
i don't think I did anything other than stop lookups for a bit.
thanks for your assistance.
Give thanks to the LORD[1], perhaps. He works in mysterious ways,
or so I hear. :)
[1] LinfORD
PS: Seriously. I doubt this is solved.
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 4/19/2010 8:29 AM:
* John Peach post...@johnpeach.com:
Your nslookup shows you using 207.172.3.20 as a nameserver:
20.3.172.207.in-addr.arpa name = auth1.dns.rcn.net
Your ISP's nameserver. You need to run your own, so that you query
spamhaus directly.
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Rather test with:
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
which should return:
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.2
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.4
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.10
yes this is working
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:03:51 -0400
Von: donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us
An: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
CC: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: DNS RBL error
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Steve wrote:
You can run that caching DNS where ever you want as long as you secure that
DNS. If you use BIND and are using forwarders to your ISP name servers then
that caching will not necessarily help much if your ISP's NS are the problem.
thanks for the
On 4/19/2010 8:22 PM, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:03:51 -0400
Von: donovan jeffrey jdono...@beth.k12.pa.us
An: Ralf Hildebrandtralf.hildebra...@charite.de
CC: Postfix userspostfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: DNS RBL error
On Apr 19, 2010
On 4/19/2010 8:03 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
question on my setup. my primary MX server sits inside my network, with a NATed
IP. my postfix config references only the inside network.
should i move this MX server outside and use it's public address in the config
? inbound mail gets checked
27 matches
Mail list logo
