On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
There you are message delivered to procmail, and procmail returned a
success (0) exit code. What happened after procmail is outside
the scope of Postfix.
Ok, fair enough but can procmail issue the
Rick Duval:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
There you are message delivered to procmail, and procmail returned a
success (0) exit code. What happened after procmail is outside
the scope of Postfix.
Ok, fair enough but can
Yes I know, I'm just showing the reject message received from Postfix
by the Exim server that attempted delivery
That is not a Postfix log entry. It is an Exim log entry. If you installed
Postfix, perhaps you didn't get Exim shut off completely.
/etc/postfix/main.cf had no message_size_limit
Yes, I have thanks but as I said, the config already is set to well
above the 14Mb limit that was rejected, it's currently set to 20M
(message_size_limit = 2048) That is 20 Megs right? I'm not
missing a zero I don't think.
So why else could it possibly be rejected?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at
Rick Duval wrote:
Yes, I have thanks but as I said, the config already is set to well
above the 14Mb limit that was rejected, it's currently set to 20M
(message_size_limit = 2048) That is 20 Megs right? I'm not
missing a zero I don't think.
So why else could it possibly be rejected?
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:40:36AM -0400, Rick Duval wrote:
Yes I know, I'm just showing the reject message received from Postfix
by the Exim server that attempted delivery
That is not a Postfix log entry. It is an Exim log entry. If you installed
Postfix, perhaps you didn't get Exim
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:43:06AM -0400, Rick Duval wrote:
Yes, I have thanks but as I said, the config already is set to well
above the 14Mb limit that was rejected, it's currently set to 20M
(message_size_limit = 2048) That is 20 Megs right?
It is 2 kilobytes, which is not quite
check the POSTFIX log.
check postconf -n output
-- Noel Jones
Done and done, see my original post. Here's the log of the email in question..
Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: connect from unknown[74.51.38.172]
Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: B3E982010001:
It is 2 kilobytes, which is not quite 20480 kilobytes, but probably
close enough. Post the output of postconf -n and Postfix server logs
showing the rejection of the message.
--
Viktor.
[r...@vps04 log]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps =
Yes. postconf -d | grep size_limit
body_checks_size_limit = 51200
bounce_size_limit = 5
header_size_limit = 102400
mailbox_size_limit = 5120
message_size_limit = 1024
Of these the last two are the most pertinent.
--
Viktor.
[r...@vps04 log]#
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:57:38AM -0400, Rick Duval wrote:
[r...@vps04 log]# postconf -n | grep size_limit
message_size_limit = 2048
OK, so you are potentially configured to accept 20,000 KB messages.
Where are the logs?
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
Rick Duval wrote:
check the POSTFIX log.
check postconf -n output
-- Noel Jones
Done and done, see my original post. Here's the log of the email in question..
Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: connect from unknown[74.51.38.172]
Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]:
[r...@vps04 log]# postconf -n | grep size_limit
message_size_limit = 2048
OK, so you are potentially configured to accept 20,000 KB messages.
Where are the logs?
--
Viktor.
SOrry, I did send it in an earlier post, here it is again.
Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]:
This message was accepted and delivered.
-- Noel Jones
Problem is that it wasn't delivered (it was coming to me and I never
rcvd it) and a reject mesage was sent as seen in the Exim logs.
This is what is confusing.
As you can see we're talking about the same message, the exact same # of
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:05:58AM -0400, Rick Duval wrote:
Sorry, I did send it in an earlier post, here it is again.
Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: connect from unknown[74.51.38.172]
Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: B3E982010001:
client=unknown[74.51.38.172]
Apr
Rick Duval wrote:
This message was accepted and delivered.
-- Noel Jones
Problem is that it wasn't delivered (it was coming to me and I never
rcvd it) and a reject mesage was sent as seen in the Exim logs.
This is what is confusing.
As you can see we're talking about the same message,
The easy explanation is that it's not the same message.
You'll have to provide better proof that it really is.
It definitely is the same message. It's the only one that the guy sent
me with a 14m attachment. I've searched the log for emails from that
user and it's the only one that has a large
Apr 22 13:52:21 vps04 postfix/smtp[16221]: 8D14B2010002:
to=duval.r...@gmail.com, orig_to=r...@duvals.ca,
relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[209$
Apr 22 13:52:56 vps04 postfix/local[16220]: B3E982010001:
to=rduval.csm-ltd@vps04.manitres.net,
orig_to=rdu...@csm-ltd.com, relay=local, d$
You are truncating all the long logfile records.
Wietse
Sorry I didn't even realize that was happening. I dl'd the file and
copied and pasted instead of grabbing from putty which I guess was
only grabbing the screen.
Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: connect from
On Thu April 23 2009 09:58:40 Rick Duval wrote:
You truncated the postfix/local log entry so we can't see if
This may be the problem. You need to use a pager or terminal which
reveals the entire long line.
Is there any other log besides /etc/Postfix/maillog?
That is an unusual location for
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:14:23AM -0400, Rick Duval wrote:
Sorry I didn't even realize that was happening. I dl'd the file and
copied and pasted instead of grabbing from putty which I guess was
only grabbing the screen.
Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: B3E982010001:
W dniu 2009-04-23 17:14, Rick Duval pisze:
You are truncating all the long logfile records.
Wietse
Sorry I didn't even realize that was happening. I dl'd the file and
copied and pasted instead of grabbing from putty which I guess was
only grabbing the screen.
Apr 22 13:52:55
I have Postfix installed as part of a Virtualmin installation and I'm
having some emails reject because of size (so the reject says, pasted
below logs from the sending server)
2009-04-22 11:33:58 1LweSG-0004iM-Sn ** rdu...@csm-ltd.com
rdu...@csm-ltd.com R=deliver_clean T=remote_smtp: SMTP error
See message_size_limit and its default value:
http://www.postfix.org/resource.html
On Apr 22, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Rick Duval wrote:
I have Postfix installed as part of a Virtualmin installation and I'm
having some emails reject because of size (so the reject says, pasted
below logs from the
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Rick Duval wrote:
I have Postfix installed as part of a Virtualmin installation and I'm
having some emails reject because of size (so the reject says, pasted
below logs from the sending server)
2009-04-22 11:33:58 1LweSG-0004iM-Sn ** rdu...@csm-ltd.com
rdu...@csm-ltd.com
25 matches
Mail list logo