On 26.09.2010 13:24, Michal Bruncko wrote:
Hello list
I am using postfix (v 2.7.0) with sender policy framework
(postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.001) and greylisting (postgrey-1.32) with
following configuration:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_policy_service unix:private/policy
Hello
On 29. 9. 2010 0:05, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Henrik K put forth on 9/28/2010 12:28 AM:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:12:01PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Snowshoe spam will most probably pass greylisting too. Better not
clutter greylisting database with useless things. Have the blacklists
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/29/2010 4:03 AM:
I mean automatically accepted by postfix, but not automatically
forwarded to mailboxes. My idea lies on principle, that if sender have
valid SPF record, there is no need to greylist (and delaying mail
receiving), but... SPF and greylisting are
Thank you for hint. It seems that this soft is also included in my
distro repository (fedora), perfect! :)
michal
On 29. 9. 2010 11:36, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/29/2010 4:03 AM:
I mean automatically accepted by postfix, but not automatically
forwarded to mailboxes.
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mikael Bak put forth on 9/27/2010 6:18 AM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
If I may be blunt:
Henrik K put forth on 9/28/2010 12:28 AM:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:12:01PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Snowshoe spam will most probably pass greylisting too. Better not
clutter greylisting database with useless things. Have the blacklists
block'em instead.
I don't follow your logic here.
Mikael Bak put forth on 9/28/2010 4:25 AM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mikael Bak put forth on 9/27/2010 6:18 AM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix
--
From: mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 1:38 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: SPF and greylisting conditioning
Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
If I may be blunt: this is a really dumb idea. Many, maybe all,
snowshoe spammers
Mikael Bak put forth on 9/27/2010 6:18 AM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
If I may be blunt: this is a really dumb
Le 27/09/2010 00:30, junkyardma...@frontier.com a écrit :
Which makes their domain an easy target for block lists.
http://www.spamhaus.org/query/dbl?domain=takeprettypictures.net
I doubt they were listed becase of their spf record.
but anyway, that would be coming late to the race again.
Le 27/09/2010 22:12, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Mikael Bak put forth on 9/27/2010 6:18 AM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:12:01PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Snowshoe spam will most probably pass greylisting too. Better not
clutter greylisting database with useless things. Have the blacklists
block'em instead.
I don't follow your logic here. Yes, most snowshoe is sent from real
Hello list
I am using postfix (v 2.7.0) with sender policy framework
(postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.001) and greylisting (postgrey-1.32) with
following configuration:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_policy_service unix:private/policy
check_policy_service
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
If I may be blunt: this is a really dumb idea. Many, maybe all,
snowshoe spammers have valid SPF records.
On 09/26/10 05:24, Michal Bruncko wrote:
Hello list
I am using postfix (v 2.7.0) with sender policy framework
(postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.001) and greylisting (postgrey-1.32) with
following configuration:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_policy_service unix:private/policy
Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
If I may be blunt: this is a really dumb idea. Many, maybe
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit :
Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
If I
Le 26/09/2010 23:28, fakessh a écrit :
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit :
Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 23:46, mouss a écrit :
Le 26/09/2010 23:28, fakessh a écrit :
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit :
Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure
and greylisting conditioning
Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
If I may be blunt: this is a really
Hello
Thank you for pointing me. It was just my quick idea but as you wrote,
perhaps many spammers have valid spf records and thus, my spam checking
will be less spam resistant.
and Michael, thank you for your hint.
On 26. 9. 2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:49:40AM +0200, Michal Bruncko wrote:
Hello
Thank you for pointing me. It was just my quick idea but as you
wrote, perhaps many spammers have valid spf records and thus, my
spam checking will be less spam resistant.
I have no problem not GREYLISTING things that
23 matches
Mail list logo
