Thijssen put forth on 2/9/2010 4:19 AM:
- If they like flashy GUI bullshit like HTML-mail and WYSIWYG
formatted emails and spam and commerce, then don't use Squirrelmail.
- If they focuss on actual text content and plaintext emails (the way
it should be), then squirrelmail is your Number One
On 02/12/2010 10:48 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Tell me about this top-secure aspect of Squirrelmail again. ;)
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15
Spammers regularly phish for ISP account information and then use those
credentials to send spam via webmail and SMTP auth. We see this
frequently, and
LuKreme put forth on 2/12/2010 10:08 AM:
On 12-Feb-2010, at 08:48, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Tell me about this top-secure aspect of Squirrelmail again. ;)
The fact that some spammers are able to get into email accounts and send spam
via squirrelmail has nothing to do with the security of
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 16:52, K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com wrote:
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
It mostly depends on the type of users you have;
- If they like flashy GUI bullshit like
yes i've used and know it's too good; but all those for small number of
users; i want to use it at an ISP level; at ISP level i require some addons
like quota/autorespond etc..i'll give a try to squirrelmail
thanks
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Thijssen jul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1,
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:43, K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com wrote:
yes i've used and know it's too good; but all those for small number of
users; i want to use it at an ISP level; at ISP level i require some addons
like quota/autorespond etc..i'll give a try to squirrelmail
XS4ALL, the
On 09/02/2010 10:19, Thijssen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 16:52, K bharathankbhara...@gmail.com wrote:
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
It mostly depends on the type of users you have;
- If they
On 2010-02-09, Thijssen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:43, K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com
wrote:
yes i've used and know it's too good; but all those for small number
of
users; i want to use it at an ISP level; at ISP level i require some
addons like quota/autorespond etc..i'll give a try
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:28, Mark Goodge m...@good-stuff.co.uk wrote:
As a lightweight webmail client, to be used as an infrequent alternative to
a desktop client (eg, for collecting your mail when out and about with only
web access), Squirrelmail is perfectly adequate for most users.
I use
On 09/02/2010 11:53, Thijssen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:28, Mark Goodgem...@good-stuff.co.uk
wrote:
But for day-to-day use as a long-term replacement for a desktop
client, or for any user who gets a much larger than normal volume
of mail,
What do you mean by that?
Hundreds, or even
On 09/02/2010 16:00, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
Possibly, although there are different reasons for detesting OE and Outlook.
OE and Outlook are crap desktop clients; most experienced high-volume mail
users prefer better clients such as Thunderbird. If your users also detest
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Mark Goodge m...@good-stuff.co.uk wrote:
On 09/02/2010 16:00, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
Possibly, although there are different reasons for detesting OE and
Outlook.
OE and Outlook are crap desktop clients; most experienced high-volume
mail
On 8-Feb-2010, at 17:34, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
100% of the servers I have access to, have,
at least once in the last year, been scanned by a bot (or person, who
knows) for /roundcoube or similar
And? I have thousands of servers trying to access my machines via sshd every
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:47 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 8-Feb-2010, at 17:34, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
100% of the servers I have access to, have,
at least once in the last year, been scanned by a bot (or person, who
knows) for /roundcoube or similar
And? I have
K bharathan put forth on 2/2/2010 10:49 AM:
thanks for all
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find
Hi!
Sorry for keeping the off-topic... but I had to answer
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Kay put forth on 2/1/2010 11:49 AM:
In my job (hosting company) I see boxes exploited via roundcube all the
time. Squirrelmail? Not one so far. Part of
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my current
version of Roundcube.
Then you haven't looked at it... the new features are really nice...
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my current
version of Roundcube.
Then you haven't looked at it... the new features are really nice...
thanks for all
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
guidance appreciated
Postfix is not
Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 10:04:20, Carlos Williams a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 10:04:20, Carlos Williams a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probably see orders of magnitude more if it weren't for
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probably see orders of
Quoting Kay li...@coffeehabit.net:
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube
j debert a écrit :
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probably see orders of magnitude
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:39:49 +0100, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
j debert a écrit :
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts
On 02/01/2010 06:49 PM, Kay wrote:
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube
Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM:
I recommend and prefer Roundcube.
http://roundcube.net/
+1
If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead of
POP. JMHO.
I'm an ex Squirrelmail user and switched to Roundcube, mainly for the nicer user
interface.
Kay put forth on 2/1/2010 11:49 AM:
In my job (hosting company) I see boxes exploited via roundcube all the
time. Squirrelmail? Not one so far. Part of the reason is that
squirrelmail comes with RHEL, so it's kept up to date automatically,
while customers install their own roundcube and
K bharathan wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
guidance appreciated
I would add from my side... Horde IMP. If you need good replacement for
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
Debian package:
[02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1
Eh? 0.3.1 is
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:17:49 -0500, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
Debian package:
[02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
* fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu:
Eh? 0.3.1 is the current version, so how is 0.2.2 'up to date'?
attention
0.3.1 is the current version , so 0.2.2 is 'up to date'
That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mouss さんは書きました:
you mean things like
GET /roundcube-0.2//bin/msgimport
GET /round//bin/msgimport
Not lately.
Most recently, they're looking for version info:
GET /rc/README
GET /webmail/README
GET /roundcube/README
On 1-Feb-2010, at 13:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM:
I recommend and prefer Roundcube.
http://roundcube.net/
+1
If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead
of POP. JMHO.
Yeah, I have to say I don't even
Charles Marcus put forth on 2/1/2010 4:17 PM:
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
Debian package:
[02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/1/2010 4:31 PM:
That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
I wish it was humor... Debian Stable always lags pretty seriously behind the
cutting edge release versions of a lot of packages. Then again, from what I
understand, so do RHEL, CentOS, SLES,
http://roundcube.net/
+1
If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead
of
POP. JMHO.
I think it depends upon the requirements. For very simple mail and setup, +1
roundcube. I have been using horde for some time for my clients (as they use
more of
39 matches
Mail list logo
