Hi people,
I currently own a postfix/courier/mailman server and some users want to
share some large files, but I don't want these files to be sent to the
other members of the list from a given filesize. In fact, I'm looking for a
way to intercept these mails, copy the joint files in a given
Gejo Paul wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Simon Aquilina sim...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I am on the verge of giving up on maildrop ... but ...
before that I have some more comments below ...
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:17:19 +0100
From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net
To:
Greetings
I have a user whos name is being spoofed by the spammers of the world.
and her mailbox is getting flooded by legitimate Mailer Delivery
notices.
Is there anything i can do for her besides change her account name ? I
was thinking about a temporary regex to discard those notices. (
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:33:36 -0600
From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
To: cwo1...@hotmail.com; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: postfix/milter added headers and header_check feature
Charles Account wrote:
Hi,
I found an email from Noel Jones:
At 09:51 AM 8/2/2007, Marshal Newrock
Can anyone help me?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:49 PM, André Lopes afsalo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running Postfix 2.4.1 and using a After-Queue Content Filter to forward
email to a Java Application Server. Everything is running just fine for
almost about 10 months, but a strange thing
Wietse Venema escribió:
default_destination_rate_delay (default: 0s)
The default amount of delay that is inserted between individual deliv-
eries to the same destination; with per-destination recipient limit
1, a destination is a domain, otherwise it is a recipient.
..
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 9:14 AM
To: Tait Grove; 'Postfix users'
Subject: Re: Hacking activity
Tait Grove wrote:
Somehow, out of the blue, my
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:39:42AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
You can use the ips.backscatterer.org to reject bounces (*NOT* all mail)
from known backscatter sources. Do this in smtpd_data_restrictions for
compatibility with sender address verification.
# main.cf
smtpd_data_restrictions =
Santiago Romero:
Wietse Venema escribi?:
default_destination_rate_delay (default: 0s)
The default amount of delay that is inserted between individual
deliv-
eries to the same destination; with per-destination recipient
limit
1, a destination is a domain,
I've been running into a really odd (bizarre) problem with Postfix that
only seems to happen on Mac OSX 10.5 (leopard). I'm really at a loss to
explain why things break the way they do, but it definitely happens. I
thought maybe some folks on the list might have some insight.
Here is the
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
I've been running into a really odd (bizarre) problem with Postfix that
only seems to happen on Mac OSX 10.5 (leopard). I'm really at a loss to
explain why things break the way they do, but it definitely happens. I
thought maybe some folks on the list might have some
Wietse Venema пишет:
Bokhan Artem:
Wietse Venema ?:
Artem Bokhan:
Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
traffic over pool of ip-addresses?
Use network address translation, to map the source IP
address+port across a range of IP addresses.
Bokhan Artem:
I
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 02:20:39PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
/etc/postfix/main.cf
check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/random.pcre
/etc/postfix/random.pcre
/^(.)(.*)/FILTER smtp$1:$1$2
Regexp recipient lookups are keyed by the full user address, and the
character-set
Spam assassin is configured to not add spam headers to outbound mail,
so that won't help. (I don't want to flag my own outbound mail as spam).
There's not a way to get postfix to not deliver
(reject/drop/whatever) messages based on the From address having an
recipient_delimiter field that
It's easier to do with a src-nat within network gear. But let me tell
you that this is referred to as snowshoeing as it expands your IP
footprint, and is seen in the deliverability world as a slimy thing to
do.
People do it to mitigate the effects of their IP addresses being
blacklisted. But
I want to setup postfix so that my users who use laptops can access their
email from anywhere and then reply to those emails through the smtp server.
What kind of security should I setup?
--On Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:54 PM -0500 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
I've been running into a really odd (bizarre) problem with Postfix that
only seems to happen on Mac OSX 10.5 (leopard). I'm really at a loss to
explain why things break the way they
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:17:14PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
So in summary: either will do, I currently don't have strong arguments
to prefer one over the other. Perhaps somebody from the Postfix side
can show a preference.
If the proxy is not configured to do content-dependent selective
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Rocco Scappatura
rocco.scappat...@infracom.it wrote:
Thanks Peter,
My aim, anyway, is to apply a such policy for outgoing messages
(including internal-to-internal messages). So I have to define a
group
which contains the IPs enabled for relay through my
I'm certain that you should rephrase that to:
Best way to NOT setup an open relay
Feel free to test your config against:
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
To ensure that your host isn't an open-relay to the Internet (Say hi
to hinet if it is)
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Rich
Rich wrote:
I want to setup postfix so that my users who use laptops can access
their email from anywhere and then reply to those emails through the
smtp server.
What kind of security should I setup?
Configure your server with SMTP AUTH, and (optional, but
recommended) TLS.
Here's the
I used the term open relay because I don't want to limit the by setting
mynetworks to a couple of networks. I was thinking by using sasl and tls
I could set mynetworks to 0/0.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Rich rhd...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to setup postfix so that my users who use laptops
0/0 is the entire internet.
Take the approach of least privileges. The idea that laptop users VPN
in if they want to be given a free ride (no auth) etc works, since you
can place your VPN subnet into mynetworks.
Perhaps your initial posting was too ambiguous.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:00 PM,
On 2/19/2009 2:40 PM, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
Spam assassin is configured to not add spam headers to outbound mail, so
that won't help. (I don't want to flag my own outbound mail as spam).
Eh? Who's talking about outbound email? Vacation.pl only executes for
inbound mail.
There's not a way
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Bokhan Artem art...@academ.org wrote:
Peter Blair пишет:
It's easier to do with a src-nat within network gear.
I understand, I just wanted to know if there is an intelligence way to bind
every ip address its own helo.
Well, you could place a slim smtp proxy
True enough-- but that won't help your HELO matching up with the
reverse of the IP that its bound to.
2009/2/19 Bokhan Artem art...@academ.org:
Peter Blair пишет:
Well, you could place a slim smtp proxy between postfix and the
Internet.
It's easier to write a small tcp server for tcp_table
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Blair wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Rich rhd...@gmail.com wrote:
I used the term open relay because I don't want to limit the by setting
mynetworks to a couple of networks. I was thinking by using sasl and tls
I could set
sim085 a écrit :
Oki, I can answer this question myself. If I execute the command maildrop -V
4 sysadmin /dev/null from the directory where .mailfilter exists then I
get the error mailfilter file isn't a regular file. Executing the same
command from any other location will give me the error
emailjohndavid a écrit :
Hello,
I am running postfix mail_version = 2.5.5 under ubuntu 8.10 server. I have
a static IP and a domain name pointed to the IP. I also have reverse IP
lookup setup for mail.myrealdomainnamehere.com to avoid being treated as a
SPAM server. (my IP and real domain
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:17:14PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
So in summary: either will do, I currently don't have strong arguments
to prefer one over the other. Perhaps somebody from the Postfix side
can show a preference.
If the proxy is not configured
Jason Voorhees a écrit :
Hi people:
I'm trying to set up a catch-all feature in my Postfix server based on
LDAP. Here's my scenario:
- Mail Accounts with VirtualMailAccount object class
- Alias with VirtualAlias object class
How can I tell Postfix to look for users/alias and return the
At 03:16 PM 2/19/2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/19/2009 2:40 PM, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
I guess maybe I'm missing something, so I'll shut up now...
When mail is inbound and is spam, it gets flagged as spam by spam
assassin, and becomes addressed to , with recipient_delimiter,
At 05:11 PM 2/19/2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/19/2009, post...@corwyn.net (post...@corwyn.net) wrote:
When mail is inbound and is spam, it gets flagged as spam by spam
assassin, and becomes addressed to , with recipient_delimiter,
user+s...@example.com
Right... so just configure
1- reinstall the maildrop package (not courier-maildrop)
2- once this is done, run the following commands:
maildrop -v
GDBM extensions enabled.
Courier Authentication Library extension enabled.
Maildir quota extension enabled.
ls -l /usr/bin/maildrop
-rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Daniel C wrote:
Since a upgrade I made last week I've been having a very strange issue.
Whenever I send an email using my server as an SMTP (with Cyrus-SASL
authentication), all my emails are sent in double. Also, when I send an
email using Imp/Horde (Webmail), emails are
Thanks everyone for the direction I needed. I am going to do sasl with
tls. Seems to be a good way to go.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:44 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Rich a écrit :
I used the term open relay because
unfortunately for you, you can't arbitrarily redefine common
2009/2/19 Bokhan Artem art...@academ.org:
smtp1 unix - - n - 100 smtp -o
smtp_helo_name=smtpout1.do -o smtp_bind_address=1.1.1.1
smtp2 unix - - n - 100 smtp -o
smtp_helo_name=smtpout2.do -o smtp_bind_address=2.2.2.2
KLaM Postmaster пишет:
Artem Bokhan:
Hi, can someone give me a hint how to randomly spread outgoing smtp
traffic over pool of ip-addresses
==
Why do you want to do this?
What problem are you trying to solve?
JLA
The main reason that some systems have too high limits, so legitimate mail
38 matches
Mail list logo