I Have fixed the problem, its firewall issue in NATing.
Regards,
Ramesh.
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, itsramesh_s itsrames...@... wrote:
Sahil,
I have rechecked my configuration and googled for any root cause for
this failure, i didn't find any clue.
Before configuring SMTP-AUTH, i
Hi,
i have one specific sender domain which should be allowed to sent over postfix
servers, however this domain is not registered as MX or DNS.
Is there a way to exclude this domain from the reject_unknown_sender_domain
check? Maybe a whitelist for this setting or add the domain in the
Harakiri:
Hi,
i have one specific sender domain which should be allowed to sent over
postfix servers, however this domain is not registered as MX or DNS.
Is there a way to exclude this domain from the reject_unknown_sender_domain
check? Maybe a whitelist for this setting or add the
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 04:05 -0800, Harakiri wrote:
Hi,
i have one specific sender domain which should be allowed to sent over
postfix servers, however this domain is not registered as MX or DNS.
Is there a way to exclude this domain from the reject_unknown_sender_domain
check? Maybe a
--- On Thu, 2/26/09, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Subject: Re: exclude one domain from reject_unknown_sender_domain
Why do people expect that OTHER mail servers will not
reject
mail with a bogus sender domain?
i dont expect it, i
When I check my Postfix mail queue, I am always noticing a strange
entry that sits there until I manually remove it. I really don't
understand why it is even routed into my Postfix server to begin with
as the recipient and domain don't match anything my server handles.
The senders address looks to
Hi guys,
I'm chasing my tail on this one. The setup is pretty simple virtual
hosting, with virtual_alias_maps in a file 'virtuals' which works fine,
except for one line:
b...@example.com bob, john, dave
When sending a mail to b...@example.com, bob receives one copy of the
mail, but
Look for receive_override_options in the MASTER.CF file
examples of the FILTER_README documentation.
Wietse
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:03:24PM +0100, Manuel P??gouri??-Gonnard wrote:
Hmm, isn't it twice the same paragrah (or two versions of it)?
May I suggest to update the description of smtpd_tls_CA_file
By the way, I'm not sure still whether I understand correctly smptd_CA_path.
Would the
I have configured postfix to sent mail trhough the smtp of my internet service provider. Now one user have a certified email account and he wants to sent mail by my server trhough the smtps. I have seen that with postfix is possible to use two different smtp but is possible to use a smtps?
Please excuse me if this has been discussed before,
i tried searching the archives and the documentation
and google and the info seems a bit dated and incomplete
and for exchange 5.5.
We have an exchange server 2003 (not sbs) at our office and several pop
accounts which we pop for email to be
Please post in plain text, not HTML.
--
Magnus Bäck
mag...@dsek.lth.se
At 08:53 AM 2/26/2009, kj wrote:
When sending a mail to b...@example.com, bob receives one copy of the
mail, but john and dave each receives two. I understand the
problem: postfix does the recipient expansion, sends it off to spamassassin.
Spamassassin requeues the mail via the sendmail
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 16:33 CET,
Nick Smith nick.smit...@gmail.com wrote:
Please excuse me if this has been discussed before, i tried searching
the archives and the documentation and google and the info seems a bit
dated and incomplete and for exchange 5.5.
We have an
You don't need any accounts for the Postfix part, just a transport table
that routes certain recipients (or whole domains) to the Exchange server
(assuming DNS won't do that job for us). You may need accounts for
fetchmail, but since you said that the fetchmail part already is covered
I'm
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:33:42AM -0500, Nick Smith wrote:
Please excuse me if this has been discussed before,
i tried searching the archives and the documentation
and google and the info seems a bit dated and incomplete
and for exchange 5.5.
We have an exchange server 2003 (not sbs) at
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:05:26PM +0100, Magnus B?ck wrote:
Is there a way to solve this on server1? I mean adding recipients
somewhere to the mail header so server2 knows where to deliver? I
already tried to set enable_original_recipient to yes - in that
case a X-Original-To: is added
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 17:12 CET,
Nick Smith nick.smit...@gmail.com wrote:
You don't need any accounts for the Postfix part, just a transport
table that routes certain recipients (or whole domains) to the
Exchange server (assuming DNS won't do that job for us). You may
Hi.
Today I had a load average issue in a postfix mail server (only runs
postfix service). Suddenly, load average started to raise and qmgr
process appeared on top of top taking 20-30% of CPU.
top - 18:19:54 up 7 days, 2:03, 2 users, load average: 4.94, 3.96, 4.02
Tasks: 144 total, 6
On Wednesday, February 25, 2009 at 20:25 CET,
Leonardo Coelho leonardoscoe...@gmail.com wrote:
I try a simple hash file with only one address on it and the postfix
ignored the file and deliver the e-mail.
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/alias-virtual
alias-virtual:
On 2/26/09, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:05:26PM +0100, Magnus B?ck wrote:
Is there a way to solve this on server1? I mean adding recipients
somewhere to the mail header so server2 knows where to deliver? I
already tried to set
Santiago Romero:
I case it happens again ... Where or what should I take a look? At OS
level (disk or network I/O, processes...) I didn't see anything before
the postfix restart...
Try ``strace -o filename -p pid'' or the equivalent for your OS.
Wietse
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 19:57 CET,
Zoltan Balogh zee.bal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/26/09, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Note, this notion of correctness is not one of those pedantic
types of correctness that is optional. Systems that forward mail
I had some issues with my mailbox storage drive this morning and Postfix
started bouncing messages with this message:
Command time limit exceeded: /usr/bin/maildrop
I see the timeout is configurable with command_time_limit, but don't see any
way to defer the message instead of immediately
ericmason:
I had some issues with my mailbox storage drive this morning and Postfix
started bouncing messages with this message:
Command time limit exceeded: /usr/bin/maildrop
I see the timeout is configurable with command_time_limit, but don't see any
way to defer the message instead
Hello.
First of all some general information:
Postfix version 2.3.8
MDA - Dovecot
Backend - Mysql
I configured Postfix to copy each message that it deliveres also to some
additional account. That worked great until...
Well AFAIR until I converted all mboxes to Maildirs, at least date when it
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 23:05 CET,
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo fe...@debian.org wrote:
First of all some general information:
Postfix version 2.3.8
MDA - Dovecot
Backend - Mysql
I configured Postfix to copy each message that it deliveres also to
some additional account. That
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:14:51PM +0100, Magnus Bäck wrote:
First of all some general information:
Postfix version 2.3.8
MDA - Dovecot
Backend - Mysql
I configured Postfix to copy each message that it deliveres also to
some additional account. That worked great until...
Well
LuKreme a écrit :
On 25-Feb-2009, at 16:25, gianluca...@interfree.it wrote:
ok, i have configured postfix to sent mail trhough the smtp of my
internet service provider. Now one user have a certified email account
and he wants to sent mail by my server trhough the smtps.
I have seen that
Hello,
I'm trying to use a policy service to limit use of my SMTP gateway
platform 'cause of heavy load that usually means hard delays to transmit
messages.
The policy service is bound to 10031 TCP port.
I have so set postfix the use policy service at the and of recipient
restriction and at
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Magnus Bäck mag...@dsek.lth.se wrote:
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 19:57 CET,
Zoltan Balogh zee.bal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/26/09, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Note, this notion of correctness is not one of those
Karl O. Pinc a écrit :
Hello,
I'm running a mailing list (using GNU
Mailman) and occasionally the
list receives mail having headers with
email addresses that have no @domain part.
(I don't know why, and it's out of my
hands in any case.)
When the list software resends the mail
to the
Zoltan Balogh a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Magnus Bäck mag...@dsek.lth.se wrote:
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 19:57 CET,
Zoltan Balogh zee.bal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/26/09, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Note, this notion of correctness is
KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
So far I am not seeing a lot of funny addresses, however I am seeing a
fair number for non-existent recipients fortunately the standard checks
handle those very well.
if the non-existent recipients aren't addresses that real people could
mistype or guess
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
I'm trying to use a policy service to limit use of my SMTP gateway
platform 'cause of heavy load that usually means hard delays to transmit
messages.
The policy service is bound to 10031 TCP port.
I have so set postfix the use policy service
Hello there, list
I'm setting up a new mailserver (postfix - amavisd-new - postfix)
for a company and while debugging (smtpd -v, trivial-rewrite -v) i've
noticed this
Feb 27 02:14:06 sandbox postfix/smtp[5700]: D95C920175B:
to=wal...@0x.com.ar,
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Andres Vergara wrote:
Feb 27 02:14:10 sandbox postfix/trivial-rewrite[5695]: idle timeout --
exiting
Feb 27 02:15:43 sandbox postfix/smtpd[5692]: idle timeout -- exiting
Those last idle timeouts.. the mails are flowing fine and amavisd is
playing nice (afaik), but
37 matches
Mail list logo
