Robert Senger via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-06-29 17:21:
...
The point is that spamassassin needs to know the username when
processing an email, to update the correct bayes database. The username
given to spamassassin by spamass-milter is the email address of the
recipient. This is fine, as
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 04:19:01PM +, Joseph L. Casale via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I have main.cf configured with relay_recipient_maps =
> ldap:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients where relay_recipients contains a
> bind_dn and bind_pw entry.
>
> I need to manage the bind parameters in another
Robert Senger via Postfix-users:
> Hi all!
>
> I am running Postfix 3.4.23 on Debian 10.13 Buster, with SpamAssassin
> 4.0.0 and spamass-milter 0.4.0-2 for spam detection.
>
> Until now, SpamAssassin was configured to use system wide bayes
> database for the bayesian classifier, which is trained
I have main.cf configured with relay_recipient_maps =
ldap:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients
where relay_recipients contains a bind_dn and bind_pw entry.
I need to manage the bind parameters in another process, is there any way to
include a
configuration file with just those two parameters within
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 06:08:27PM +0200, Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I remember there was the goal to use DANE for the mailing list, but I
> wonder whether or to what extend that has been achieved.
>
The list traffic is hardly confidential, but "dog-food" consumption has
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:04:58AM -0700, Patrick Mahan wrote:
> Thanks Viktor, I will do so. I am taking advantage of this to (finally)
> set up a rooted certificate and not just a self-signed one as it seems that
> Apple mail has problems with my puny self-signed one. I also need to look
> at
I remember there was the goal to use DANE for the mailing list, but I wonder
whether or to what extend that has been achieved.
Can someone please clarify?
Thanks,
Joachim
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 8:03 PM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:22:23PM -0700, Patrick Mahan via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > > See:
> > >
> > > https://www.postfix.org/COMPATIBILITY_README.html
> > >
> > > for how to accept
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Robert Senger via Postfix-users wrote:
> Of course, I could write my own "sendmail" script which takes the
> virtual_alias,
This is possible with care, but not ideal, better would be to find
some way to get the milter to make the relevant queries
Hi all!
I am running Postfix 3.4.23 on Debian 10.13 Buster, with SpamAssassin
4.0.0 and spamass-milter 0.4.0-2 for spam detection.
Until now, SpamAssassin was configured to use system wide bayes
database for the bayesian classifier, which is trained by both sa's
autolearn feature and by sa-learn
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 03:30:22PM +0300, Nikolaos Milas via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Jun 29 06:07:51 mailgw1 postfix/smtpd[471355]: warning:
> hostname chg.server1.ideacentral.com
> does not resolve to address 173.236.106.135
>
> 1. Is it normal/acceptable to have hostnames not resolving to
2023. 06. 29. 14:30 keltezéssel, Nikolaos Milas via Postfix-users írta:
Hello,
I would like to ask your help to find out how to best resolve the
following warnings. We are having a lot of such warnings; here is a sample:
DNS entry and revese DNS enrty bad.
$ host chg.server1.ideacentral.com
Hello,
I would like to ask your help to find out how to best resolve the
following warnings. We are having a lot of such warnings; here is a sample:
...
Jun 29 06:07:33 mailgw1 postfix/smtpd[471365]: warning: hostname
chg.server1.ideacentral.com does not resolve to address 173.236.106.135
Dnia 29.06.2023 o godz. 13:46:00 Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
> >That seems to be the only option.
>
> that is the question - if price for static IP Address is higher or
> lower than price for relaying.
As I already wrote, with many ISPs static IP with configurable rDNS is not
Price is not the only question. If you have or want to comply with GDPR, you
have to pick one not under U.S. jurisdiction, and these are rare.
In fact, a VPS that does VPN is imho the best option and usually a lot cheaper
than a static IP address for your residential line. You can then host your
Dnia 28.06.2023 o godz. 08:55:37 Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users pisze:
in my experience, this is a problem when you have
- dynamically added IP address (and thus iss listed in spamhaus PBL,
sorbs dyna and other dnsbls)
- generic rDNS or non-working fcrdns
the first should be fixable
16 matches
Mail list logo
