Re: postmap changed between 2.3.8 and 2.5.5

2009-02-16 Thread Harakiri
--- On Mon, 2/16/09, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote: From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de Subject: Re: postmap changed between 2.3.8 and 2.5.5 To: postfix-users@postfix.org Date: Monday, February 16, 2009, 8:00 AM * richard lucassen mailingli

Re: postmap changed between 2.3.8 and 2.5.5

2009-02-16 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Harakiri harakiri...@yahoo.com: the default for postfix is this: default_database_type = hash hash == berkly db? that would mean its a poor choice by postfix itself Not if you compile it yourself :) -- Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de Postfix

Re: postmap changed between 2.3.8 and 2.5.5

2009-02-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Harakiri: --- On Mon, 2/16/09, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote: From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de Subject: Re: postmap changed between 2.3.8 and 2.5.5 To: postfix-users@postfix.org Date: Monday, February 16, 2009, 8:00 AM * richard lucassen

Re: postmap changed between 2.3.8 and 2.5.5

2009-02-16 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:14:21AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: hash == berkly db? that would mean its a poor choice by postfix itself There are plenty platforms where the on-disk format of Berkeley DB database files is stable across many operating system releases. And the only sensible

Re: postmap changed between 2.3.8 and 2.5.5

2009-02-16 Thread richard lucassen
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:20:58 -0800 (PST) Harakiri harakiri...@yahoo.com wrote: that seems correct - i cant verify the issue of the OP - i created a transport map db in etch, and verified it in lenny postfix 2.5.x - i didnt have the issue. Seems like the OP doesnt have a full lenny upgrade?!