On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 12:20 -0400, Obe, Regina wrote:
Just tested by upgrading to 8.3.1 - doesn't make a difference. Actually
for example
When I do something like
SELECT ST_Union(the_geom)
FROM boszip
which glues all the boston zips into one MULTIPOLYGON it crashes the
whole PostgreSQL
Thanks Regina,
That works great.
Cheers
Will
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:00:44 Obe, Regina wrote:
This is a known issue which I think Mark Cave-Ayland is working on.
I think Mike Leahy had suggested using
ST_MemUnion as a work around.
Hope that helps,
Regina
My current thinking is that it's related to array access under PostgreSQL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Cave-Ayland
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 5:45 AM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] ST_Union and 8.3?
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:00:44 Obe, Regina wrote:
This is a known issue which I think Mark Cave-Ayland is working on.
I think Mike Leahy
On Thursday 20 March 2008 13:37:03 Obe, Regina wrote:
Mark,
Can you think of anything wrong with using ST_MemUnion as a temporary
fix aside from the fact that I guess for larger unioning jobs it is
probably less efficient?
I can't say that I've had much to do with that section of code - I
Cave-Ayland
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:58 AM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] ST_Union and 8.3?
On Thursday 20 March 2008 13:37:03 Obe, Regina wrote:
Mark,
Can you think of anything wrong with using ST_MemUnion as a temporary
fix aside from the fact that I guess
This is a known issue which I think Mark Cave-Ayland is working on.
I think Mike Leahy had suggested using
ST_MemUnion as a work around.
Hope that helps,
Regina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Temperley
Sent: Wednesday, March
