Hello,
I've working with MPTCP protocol and I need access the OPTIONS field
from TCP protocol. How can I access the OPTIONS field, using tcp_opt class?
cheers,
marcus.
think it should just end up with the raw bytes in the tcp_opt
object's .val attribute.
-- Murphy
On Dec 25, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Marcus Sandri mww...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've working with MPTCP protocol and I need access the OPTIONS
field from TCP protocol. How can I access
:
for opt in packet_tcp.options:
print type:%s data:%s % (opt.type, opt.val)
-- Murphy
On Dec 26, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Marcus Sandri mww...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly,
But how can I access .val atributes?
I tried:
packet = event.parsed
packet_tcp = packet.find(tcp)
if(packet_tcp
Marcus Sandri mww...@gmail.com
Now I can access those values!
Thanks!
2013/12/26 Murphy McCauley murphy.mccau...@gmail.com
You need to get an actual instance of the tcp_opt class (stored in the
.options attribute of the TCP object). Try something like:
packet = event.parsed
packet_tcp
I think you can do this with deep packet inspection, then you could
compress and re-build your packet. But I saying this, thinking that you
are thinking in use algorithms such as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Jacobson_TCP/IP_Header_Compression Am I
correct?
Cheers,
Marcus.
2014-02-12
.
It was introduced a component which allows hypervisor (l2_flowvisor) and a
lot components in pox/misc, such as fullpayload.py, which allows you do DPI.
Cheers,
Marcus Sandri.
2014-02-19 13:13 GMT-03:00 Lucas Brasilino lr...@cin.ufpe.br:
Hi!
Can anybody explain in a few words what each Pox branch
Hello All,
Problem in storing values in data-structures
Hello All,
I'm trying to store values into data structures, specifically lists. I've
tried to use Append() method to append new values in my list as always. But
as far as I know, when I run the controller, it just store
Hello,
Is that possible set a match and action without in_port and/or
out_port argument?
Hello,
Are you using wireshark v.1.8 or more current version?
Em 23/08/2014 19:46, Murphy McCauley murphy.mccau...@gmail.com escreveu:
Wireshark is adding official support for OpenFlow. You may already have
it. This might explain why you have both openflow.so and
Hello,
Why don't you use l2_multi? It uses spanning tree, and if you want a
backup path when a link is down it works very well. However, if you are
looking for a packet replay, remember that you need see if there's host
support (in case of UDP, you can search a paper called n-cast or in
10 matches
Mail list logo
