Well, IIRC, riplpox stuffs topology-specific addresses into the VLAN header.
It's possible that at larger sizes, there aren't enough bits (or that they're
not allocated correctly).
-- Murphy
On Sep 2, 2015, at 7:47 PM, Amer wrote:
> Thank you Murphy
> Yes, it is working correctly with the default number of host (i.e., 16 hosts).
>
> Best regards,
> Amer
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 4:00 AM, Murphy McCauley wrote:
>
>> Did it work correctly with a smaller number of hosts before modification?
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, Amer wrote:
>> Dear All
>>
>> The default number of hosts in riplpox is 16. I modified some commands in
>> dctopo.py in ripl folder to get the needed number of hosts. Accordingly, the
>> riplpox recognize this increase and inserts the required flow-entries when I
>> run it in proactive mode. Unfortunately, the added hosts can't ping each
>> other. For example, hosts 0_0_2 can't ping the added host 0_0_4, at the same
>> time, host 0_0_2 can ping 0_0_3.
>> The flow-entries of all the hosts are installed in the flow-table, when I
>> checked the flow-table of the switches. Also, I tried with reactive and the
>> same problem was faced.
>>
>> Any body has a suggestion to solve this issue.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Amer