Re: StructureToken version of RecordToken?

2003-04-04 Thread Jim Kleckner
Re-phrasing this question: Is there any reason not to map the publicly visible (i.e. settable and gettable) fields of a Java object into the fields of a RecordToken? On the face of it, it would be a good fusion of the two evaluation disciplines. Comments? Jim Jim Kleckner wrote: Beg pardon if

StructureToken version of RecordToken?

2003-03-13 Thread Jim Kleckner
Beg pardon if this has been hashed over before. While reading the Data Package section of the design document and thinking about coupling Java code with simulation code, it occurred to me that Java class implementations that satisfy the properties of immutability could be passed around and