Re: [ptxdist] Autogenerated .in files

2008-10-29 Thread Carsten Schlote
Hi Robert, just a short note on another milestone on our way to ptxdist-2.0: Marc has recently implemented autogeneration of menues. That means that you Yes, I just rebased my patches against trunk. My patch files got immediately shorter as no patching in the menufiles is needed anymore :-)

Re: [ptxdist] Autogenerated .in files

2008-10-29 Thread Gary Thomas
Robert Schwebel wrote: Hi, just a short note on another milestone on our way to ptxdist-2.0: Marc has recently implemented autogeneration of menues. That means that you can now throw a .in file into your projcect's rules/ directory (just like you could with a .make file) and have it

Re: [ptxdist] Autogenerated .in files

2008-10-29 Thread Carsten Schlote
## SECTION=system_libraries rest of the .in file Is there a dummy section for uncategorized files? Which files are uncategorized? All packages we have belong either into one of the predefined categories, or they are hosttools without menus (SECTION=hosttools_noprompt in that case)

Re: [ptxdist] Autogenerated .in files

2008-10-29 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:25:37PM +0100, Carsten Schlote wrote: Maybe I asked the wrong way. What happens to .make/.in files, which do not have a SECTION tag in the .in file yet? What is the default SECTION name in absence of the tag? Marc will add some sanity checks in order to detect such