On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 07:07:55PM +0100, Martin Hejnfelt wrote:
Signed-off-by: Martin Hejnfelt m...@newtec.dk
Thanks, applied.
Michael
---
:00 100644 000... d9c32c0... Arules/oracle-java7-jre.in
:00 100644 000... ab8af1e... Arules/oracle-java7-jre.make
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:36:19PM +0100, Martin Hejnfelt wrote:
Hi Michael,
2015-01-08 12:58 GMT+01:00 Michael Olbrich m.olbr...@pengutronix.de:
Any reason to use java7 and not java8?
Only reason is that I am developing for Java 7, and want to keep the
compatibility (or at least not
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:36:19PM +0100, Martin Hejnfelt wrote:
2015-01-08 12:58 GMT+01:00 Michael Olbrich m.olbr...@pengutronix.de:
Any reason to use java7 and not java8?
Only reason is that I am developing for Java
Signed-off-by: Martin Hejnfelt m...@newtec.dk
---
:00 100644 000... d9c32c0... A rules/oracle-java7-jre.in
:00 100644 000... ab8af1e... A rules/oracle-java7-jre.make
rules/oracle-java7-jre.in | 10 ++
rules/oracle-java7-jre.make | 87
Lets try again :)
Kind regards,
Martin Hejnfelt
--
ptxdist mailing list
ptxdist@pengutronix.de
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:43:16AM +0100, Martin Hejnfelt wrote:
Signed-off-by: Martin Hejnfelt m...@newtec.dk
---
:00 100644 000... 4b4512c... Arules/oracle-java7-jre.in
:00 100644 000... 8a5603d... Arules/oracle-java7-jre.make
rules/oracle-java7-jre.in |
Hi Michael,
2015-01-08 12:58 GMT+01:00 Michael Olbrich m.olbr...@pengutronix.de:
Any reason to use java7 and not java8?
Only reason is that I am developing for Java 7, and want to keep the
compatibility (or at least not introduce any issues, simply for
versioning). In my opinion, you should
Signed-off-by: Martin Hejnfelt m...@newtec.dk
---
:00 100644 000... 4b4512c... A rules/oracle-java7-jre.in
:00 100644 000... 8a5603d... A rules/oracle-java7-jre.make
rules/oracle-java7-jre.in | 25 +++
rules/oracle-java7-jre.make | 102
