Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:55:48AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Thursday 21 July 2016 07:18:40, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:41:00AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > > is it possible to generate several build setups, e.g. multiple software
> > > components,
Hi,
On Thursday 21 July 2016 07:18:40, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:41:00AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > is it possible to generate several build setups, e.g. multiple software
> > components, which requires individual cmake calls, within one ptxdist
> > package? What
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:41:00AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> is it possible to generate several build setups, e.g. multiple software
> components, which requires individual cmake calls, within one ptxdist package?
> What would be a workaround if I can't do that?
Why don't you create
On Tuesday 19 July 2016 13:28:30, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:41:00AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is it possible to generate several build setups, e.g. multiple software
> > components, which requires individual cmake calls, within one ptxdist
> > package?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:41:00AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to generate several build setups, e.g. multiple software
> components, which requires individual cmake calls, within one ptxdist package?
Yes, you can do whatever you want in your compile target. See for
Hi,
is it possible to generate several build setups, e.g. multiple software
components, which requires individual cmake calls, within one ptxdist package?
What would be a workaround if I can't do that?
Best regards,
Alexander
___
ptxdist mailing
