Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] iperf: version bump

2017-01-04 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:33:42PM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 08:51:10PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:12:51PM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > > Well, the configure options could use some cleanup in general, but that's > > > nothing new.

Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] iperf: version bump

2017-01-04 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 08:51:10PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:12:51PM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > Well, the configure options could use some cleanup in general, but that's > > nothing new. > > You mean adding the (current) default options explicitly,

Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] iperf: version bump

2016-12-17 Thread Clemens Gruber
Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:12:51PM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote: > Well, the configure options could use some cleanup in general, but that's > nothing new. You mean adding the (current) default options explicitly, right? To sum up the update checklist: 1) Check the diff of the configure

Re: [ptxdist] [PATCH] iperf: version bump

2016-12-16 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, Well, the configure options could use some cleanup in general, but that's nothing new. And for all packages: I prefer it if the subject contains ' -> '. It makes review easier. That way it's easier to see which updates a small patch-level updates and require less review (and can be applied