Hi all,
Today we released the 0.3 version of the Bio2RDF server code, with
significant differences to the 0.2 version. You can download it from
sourceforge at [1]
Some of the new features are as follows:
Implement support for more non-Bio2RDF SPARQL endpoints such as
LinkedCT, DrugBank,
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
* Some http://database.bio2rdf.org/database:identifier URI's are given
by this, but these aren't standard, and are only shown where there is
still at least one SPARQL endpoint available which uses them.
Hi,
I am not sure if such an announcement belongs to this list. Both
companies are dealing with LOD and the primary purpose of the event is
to see what people can come up with when meshing-up data and services
close to LOD.
So here it is:
Freebase+Zemanta developer meetup in San Francisco
Hi,
On 20.03.2009, at 03:11, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
The point was this: _if_ you would like your data to be
incorporated into
the dogfood site, then it should have dogfood namespace URIs,
otherwise we
cannot serve it. We hope to offer people who want to contribute to
the site
what
Hi Peter - Great work! I have a question - why are there so many namespaces
for these resources:
* DBpedia - dbpedia, dbpedia_property, dbpedia_class
* LinkedCT - linkedct_ontology, linkedct_intervention,
linkedct_trials, linkedct_collabagency, linkedct_condition,
linkedct_link,
http://www.gisuser.com/content/view/17142/2/
(Requires Java)
Example screenshot:
http://www.geographie.uni-bonn.de/karto/osm-3d/Screenshots/Frankfurt/Frankfurt4.jpg
Hi Knud,
Just some short specifics in response...
2009/3/19 Knud Hinnerk Möller knud.moel...@deri.org:
Hi again,
On 19.03.2009, at 14:58, Tom Heath wrote:
Hi Knud :)
2009/3/19 Knud Hinnerk Möller knud.moel...@deri.org:
Hi Tom,
great stuff, and nice you're using some of our swc
Hi all,
Not sure if this is the place for this, but I believe it is common concern.
I have seen several projects using tweaks (color, distortion,
composition) of the Semantic Web box logo. After reading the
policies I believe that this is allowed as long as there is no W3C
logo involved.
