On 16 Feb 2010, at 23:13, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Feb 16, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Sean Bechhofer wrote:
LODders
A simple (possibly dumb) question. Is there a standard mechanism
for linking an HTML page to the non-information resource that it
describes?
Um. OK, I have an equally dumb question
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
I really don't believe we achieve much via:
link rel=primarytopic
href=http://education.data.gov.uk/id/school/56; /
primarytopic isn't an IANA registered type link.
Yes, I know. Nor is foaf:primaytopic :)
I
PS.
http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
On 17 February 2010 12:00, Danny Ayers danny.ay...@gmail.com wrote:
For a definition of Linked Data I'd suggest anything that conforms to
timbl's Linked Data expectations:
1. Use URIs as names for things
2. Use HTTP URIs so that people
For a definition of Linked Data I'd suggest anything that conforms to
timbl's Linked Data expectations:
1. Use URIs as names for things
2. Use HTTP URIs so that people can look up those names.
3. When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using
the standards (RDF, SPARQL)
Wow Nathan, that's an interesting set of reactions - we could go off and
discuss them, but I will give my 3 cents on the original question.
I too have difficulty with customers on the Open word.
Open can mean a few things, and some of the posters here seem to interpret
it to mean open standards.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Damian Steer d.st...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
Historical aside:
On 17/02/10 11:20, Hugh Glaser wrote:
More recently I have also badged as Web of Data;
See [1], since 1998 :-) It's been used fairly regularly since then, although
I'd highlight [2] as a
Nathan wrote:
Hi All,
Other than the obvious - Linking Open Data = The name of W3C Community
Project - I'm wondering which terminology to use where when talking
about (what I'll term Linked Data for now).
To me, Linked Data represents the uri uri uri triples; the thing
at the core of it, which
Ed Summers wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com wrote:
You can see it in use on data.gov.uk:
http://education.data.gov.uk/doc/school/56
contains:
link rel=primarytopic href=http://education.data.gov.uk/id/school/56; /
Wow, thanks Ian. I
Kingsley, Ed,
We need a document that covers the following:
1. Linked Data Auto Discovery Patterns
2. How to associate documents with the things they describe.
Agree. I've started a document at [1] now - please dump your ideas,
thoughts, requirements, etc. there and I'll take care of
Dan Brickley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Damian Steer d.st...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
Historical aside:
On 17/02/10 11:20, Hugh Glaser wrote:
More recently I have also badged as Web of Data;
See [1], since 1998 :-) It's been used fairly regularly since then,
Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Kingsley, Ed,
We need a document that covers the following:
1. Linked Data Auto Discovery Patterns
2. How to associate documents with the things they describe.
Agree. I've started a document at [1] now - please dump your ideas,
thoughts, requirements, etc.
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Wow Nathan, that's an interesting set of reactions - we could go off and
discuss them, but I will give my 3 cents on the original question.
I too have difficulty with customers on the Open word.
Open can mean a few things, and some of the posters here seem to interpret
it
Dan Brickley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Damian Steer d.st...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
Historical aside:
On 17/02/10 11:20, Hugh Glaser wrote:
More recently I have also badged as Web of Data;
See [1], since 1998 :-) It's been used fairly regularly since then, although
I'd
On Feb 17, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
... . RDF was originally
standardised as a metadata system, a mechanism for finding stuff ...
whether that stuff was photos, videos, HTML pages, excel spreadsheets,
SQL databases, 3d models. ...
Really? That was not the impression I got when I
Nathan wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Wow Nathan, that's an interesting set of reactions - we could go off and
discuss them, but I will give my 3 cents on the original question.
I too have difficulty with customers on the Open word.
Open can mean a few things, and some of the posters here seem
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Nathan wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Wow Nathan, that's an interesting set of reactions - we could go off and
discuss them, but I will give my 3 cents on the original question.
I too have difficulty with customers on the Open word.
Open can mean a few things, and some
Nathan wrote:
Dan Brickley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Damian Steer d.st...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
Historical aside:
On 17/02/10 11:20, Hugh Glaser wrote:
More recently I have also badged as Web of Data;
See [1], since 1998 :-) It's been used fairly
Pat Hayes wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
... . RDF was originally
standardised as a metadata system, a mechanism for finding stuff ...
whether that stuff was photos, videos, HTML pages, excel spreadsheets,
SQL databases, 3d models. ...
Really? That was not the
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Pat Hayes wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
... . RDF was originally
standardised as a metadata system, a mechanism for finding stuff ...
whether that stuff was photos, videos, HTML pages, excel
spreadsheets,
SQL
Pat Hayes wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Pat Hayes wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
... . RDF was originally
standardised as a metadata system, a mechanism for finding stuff ...
whether that stuff was photos, videos, HTML pages, excel
Pat Hayes wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Pat Hayes wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
... . RDF was originally
standardised as a metadata system, a mechanism for finding stuff ...
whether that stuff was photos, videos, HTML pages, excel
On 17 Feb 2010, at 18:14, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
... . RDF was originally
standardised as a metadata system, a mechanism for finding stuff ...
whether that stuff was photos, videos, HTML pages, excel
spreadsheets,
SQL
Danny Ayers wrote:
For a definition of Linked Data I'd suggest anything that conforms to
timbl's Linked Data expectations:
1. Use URIs as names for things
2. Use HTTP URIs so that people can look up those names.
3. When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using
the
23 matches
Mail list logo
