Hi,
I definitely think IETF should place RDF representations at those
locations, as Henry suggests (e.g. 303 to say
http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation.rdf). Is there really no
way we could make this happen? Since the
http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/* URI:s are used directly
in many
Niklas Lindström wrote:
Hi,
I definitely think IETF should place RDF representations at those
locations, as Henry suggests (e.g. 303 to say
http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation.rdf). Is there really no
way we could make this happen? Since the
http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/* URI:s
Niklas,
While I have seen definitions of these relations made by the community
before (e.g. used directly in AtomOwl, and a complete listing made by
Ed Summers, which I unfortunately cannot find now),
You're not peradventure talking about [1], no?
Cheers,
Michael
[1]
Nathan,
and quote:
If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be
considered to be http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/;
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt
Just for the record: the current draft of Web Linking is [1] and the
statement
Simply looking for the best place to discuss acl/acf/wac / write enabled
web of data etc - mailing list or irc or private contacts - unsure if
this comes under the banner of linked data and thus this mailing list.
i.e. whilst I can have a good realtime discussion about rest related
things,
2010/4/3 Nathan nat...@webr3.org
Hi All,
Simply looking for the best place to discuss acl/acf/wac / write enabled
web of data etc - mailing list or irc or private contacts - unsure if
this comes under the banner of linked data and thus this mailing list.
i.e. whilst I can have a good
Nathan, Phil, All,
and quote:
If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be
considered to be http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/;
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt
obviously all the links defined by:
Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Nathan, Phil, All,
and quote:
If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be
considered to be http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/;
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt
obviously all the links defined by:
Hi Michael,
that's great! If [2] were to be updated with that [1] (i.e. officially
containing RDFa about these URI:s), and would be 303:d to from [3]
(along with anything under that URL), this would be all we need. I
know it hasn't happened for years, but sometimes a nudge at just the
right time
