It's big news for the wider Semantic Web community, as it shows that Google is
determined to extract better semantics from pages it crawls ... but it's
mediocre news for the LOD community. Freebase is based on proprietary database
technology, it relies on its own graph data format, is queryable
Hi Hugh,
comment below,
On 19/07/10 08:22, Hugh Glaser wrote:
to answer to your question, Sindice will accept the document, perform
reasoning and index it as it is. However, Sindice is somehow robust to
this kind of poisonous data. Sindice is performing a particular kind
of reasoning that we
Hi.
Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 à 09:46 +0200, Javier Pozueco Pérez a écrit :
(sorry for cross posting)
We are glad to announce the first public release of RDFa Developer, a
firefox extension that helps you to correctly annotate web pages with
RDFa.
This tool enables you to examine the
On 20 July 2010 11:40, Hondros, Constantine
constantine.hond...@wolterskluwer.com wrote:
It's big news for the wider Semantic Web community, as it shows that Google
is determined to extract better semantics from pages it crawls ... but it's
mediocre news for the LOD community. Freebase is
2010/7/13 Javier Pozueco Pérez javier.pozu...@fundacionctic.org
(sorry for cross posting)
We are glad to announce the first public release of RDFa Developer, a
firefox extension that helps you to correctly annotate web pages with RDFa.
This tool enables you to examine the RDFa markup, to
Bob Ferris wrote:
The second property of co:Counter is co:count, which is a simple
xsd:int based datatype property.
Any reasons for not using rdf:value[1]?
Not that it would make a lot of difference, but seems like this property
was made exactly for such statements.
[1]
Hi Vasiliy,
Am 20.07.2010 14:39, schrieb Vasiliy Faronov:
Bob Ferris wrote:
The second property of co:Counter is co:count, which is a simple
xsd:int based datatype property.
Any reasons for not using rdf:value[1]?
Not that it would make a lot of difference, but seems like this property
was
Bob Ferris wrote:
How can I make sure that the value of my counter concept is of the type
xsd:Integer? I think with the current definition:
co:count
rdf:type rdf:Property , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:comment Links a counter resource to the actual count@en ;
Sorry Bob, I was reading the RDFS spec in a completely wrong way, as it
says clearly[1]:
A typed literal is an instance of a datatype class.
So you're doing it all right, then.
My initial point was merely about putting rdf:value to better use, but I
understand your desire to have a
