Hello all
Just trying to figure what is the size of personal information available as
LOD vs billions of person profiles stored by Google, Amazon, Facebook,
LinkedIn, unameit ... in proprietary formats.
Any hint of the proportion of living people vs historical characters is
also welcome.
Any
re
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:15:46AM +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Just trying to figure what is the size of personal information available as
LOD vs billions of person profiles stored by Google, Amazon, Facebook,
LinkedIn, unameit ... in proprietary formats.
At www.foaf-search.net, we have
re
BTW: The note on http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/DataSources that the Billion
Triples Challenge 2009 contains 40 million FOAFs is a bit misleading. If you
follow the link you can see that there are 39 mio X a foaf:Person assertions
in the dataset which boils down to much less distinct
On 13 April 2011 10:54, Michael Brunnbauer bru...@netestate.de wrote:
re
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:15:46AM +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Just trying to figure what is the size of personal information available as
LOD vs billions of person profiles stored by Google, Amazon, Facebook,
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bridget Robinson b.r.robin...@ukoln.ac.uk
Date: 13 April 2011 11:29:33 GMT+01:00
Subject: IDCC11 - Call for Papers
7th International Digital Curation Conference - CALL FOR PAPERS
Title: Public? Private? Personal? navigating the open data landscape
5 - 7
re
BTW: The note on http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/DataSources that the
Billion
Triples Challenge 2009 contains 40 million FOAFs is a bit
misleading. If
you
follow the link you can see that there are 39 mio X a foaf:Person
assertions
in the dataset which boils down to much less distinct
re
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:11:23PM +0200, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
there's a few bridges too such as ones last.fm, flikr and semantic tweet
So including bridge I'd guess 250 million, 99% should be alive today,
but that number will fall over time (obviously)
Yes those bridges hardly count
Dear all,
just a short reminder that the deadline for the I-Semantics 2011
conference (April 30th) is in two weeks.
The CfP can be found at:
http://i-semantics.tugraz.at/scientific-track/call-for-papers.
Looking forward to your submissions,
Axel
--
Axel Ngonga, Dr. rer. nat
Johannisgasse
Hi All,
I was looking at the number of foaf files on the web over a year ago now,
output looks like so :
http://mmt.me.uk/slides/lod24022010/#(16)
Mischa
On 13 Apr 2011, at 12:11, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
On 13 April 2011 10:54, Michael Brunnbauer bru...@netestate.de wrote:
re
On Wed,
Nice picture .. don't suppose you have any data at previous times so we can see
the growth?
Tim
On 2011-04 -13, at 07:37, Mischa Tuffield wrote:
Hi All,
I was looking at the number of foaf files on the web over a year ago now,
output looks like so :
On 4/13/11 4:15 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Hello all
Just trying to figure what is the size of personal information
available as LOD vs billions of person profiles stored by Google,
Amazon, Facebook, LinkedIn, unameit ... in proprietary formats.
Any hint of the proportion of living people vs
re
Here is the current top 25 for foaf-search.net (Number of RDF documents per
second level domain). dbpedia is not included because we used the dumps and
livejournal.com was not crawled completely. Not all RDF documents are about
persons. We index every document containing a foaf:name or
re
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:47:33PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Was mybloglog's foaf ever indexed? According to wikipedia:
Currently, MyBlogLog averages approximately 22 million visits to pages with
MyBlogLog widgets each day, and the site has over 275,000 registered
members.
Yes it was
Using Safari, when I click on the link above I hit an authentication
challenge [1].
Oh, I see. Clicking on the export links in the browser works without
authentication, but issuing the queries directly doesn't yet. No good reason
for that, so I'll get it changed.
1. Do you have a Data Object
sindice.com main index has 37,312,159 documents occurrences of foaf:person.
http://sindice.com/search?q=foaf%3Aperson
(a lot of these come from microformats via the any23 library but anyway)
which means there are many more actual persons inside.
Gio
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Bernard
re
I am missing the foaf:Persons in Kingsleys LOD Cloud Cache Analysis:
https://spreadsheets0.google.com/ccc?hl=enkey=tub0WHafqXO9zsdDrpeuxqwhl=en#gid=0
They should be in the Total Objects in an isA Relation Count (Top 50).
Are they missing because the system does not count blank nodes here
On 4/13/11 10:35 AM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
Using Safari, when I click on the link above I hit an
authentication challenge [1].
Oh, I see. Clicking on the export links in the browser works without
authentication, but issuing the queries directly doesn't yet. No good
reason for that,
I don't think your detailed questions about Needle have any relevance to
this conversation about data quality, and I'm not sure they're of much
relevance to this mailing list at all, so I'm not going to follow up on them
any further in this context unless somebody else expresses interest. As Hugh
to add to this, internal sources report for xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person
totalReferences (number of triple involving a foaf person) 964563435
( almost a billion, obviously not unique individuals)
graphReferences (number of pages /resolvable URLs/graphs)34915501
domainReferences (number of distinct
On 4/13/11 11:41 AM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
I don't think your detailed questions about Needle have any relevance
to this conversation about data quality, and I'm not sure they're of
much relevance to this mailing list at all, so I'm not going to follow
up on them any further in this context
On 4/13/11 11:42 AM, Marco Neumann wrote:
I am currently looking Chapter vs Years and I think you do some very
nice data presentation here.
https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Loticoquery=Chapter+vs+Years
Though you also tend to overwrite the graph pattern with
I've updated this data to model the individual chapter-joining events.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
On 4/13/11 11:42 AM, Marco Neumann wrote:
I am currently looking Chapter vs Years and I think you do some very
nice data presentation here.
On 4/13/11 1:33 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
I've updated this data to model the individual chapter-joining events.
Cool!
Conversations about Data do work :-)
Now imagine if I could take the URI for 'Lotico Semantic Web New York'
from your Data Space as mechanism for meshing with related data
On 4/13/11 6:54 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
I could not find working bridges for last.fm and flikr but semantictweet.com
is really working again - interesting:-)
We've always had Sponger Cartridges (bridges) for last.fm and flickr. In
addition there are cartridges for Crunchbase, Amazon, and
On 4/13/11 8:32 AM, Mischa Tuffield wrote:
I have data somewhere (need to recall on which machine), will dig it
up and circulate soon, I imagine it will take me over a week or so, so
please bare with me on this.
Great!
Linked Open People Profiles (LOP or LOPP) Cloud is there for the taking.
On 4/13/11 9:59 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
re
Here is the current top 25 for foaf-search.net (Number of RDF documents per
second level domain). dbpedia is not included because we used the dumps and
livejournal.com was not crawled completely. Not all RDF documents are about
persons. We index
On 4/13/11 11:08 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
re
I am missing the foaf:Persons in Kingsleys LOD Cloud Cache Analysis:
https://spreadsheets0.google.com/ccc?hl=enkey=tub0WHafqXO9zsdDrpeuxqwhl=en#gid=0
They should be in the Total Objects in an isA Relation Count (Top 50).
Are they missing
So tonight I would turn my question otherwise : Among those millions
of
FOAF profiles, how do I discover those of which primary source is
their
primary topic, expressing herself natively in FOAF, vs the ocean of
second-hand remashed / remixed information, captured with or without
clear
On 4/13/11 5:49 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
So tonight I would turn my question otherwise : Among those millions
of FOAF profiles, how do I discover those of which primary source is
their primary topic, expressing herself natively in FOAF, vs the ocean
of second-hand remashed / remixed
On 13 April 2011 23:49, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
Thanks everybody !
Could not imagine that this simple question would trigger such an activity.
Actually my naive quest was to figure how many people had actively
published, and possibly still maintain a FOAF profile for
30 matches
Mail list logo
