On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 05:51 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
David, as you know, it is trivial to distinguish in representation the
difference between an information object and a person.
Correct. And that distinction is important to some apps and not to
others.
I am glad we agree. We
On 13 Jun 2011, at 00:20, Pat Hayes wrote:
What do we say when the range of a property is supposed to be, say,
people, but its considered OK to insert a string to stand in place of the
person?
Well, I can define a class that contains both people (in the foaf:Person
sense) and names of
On 6/13/11 1:28 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
But I don't think all this is really germane to the http-range-14 issue. The
point there is, does the URI refer to something like a representation
(information resource, website, document, RDF graph, whatever) or something
which definitely canNOT be sent
On 6/13/11 6:52 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
OK, I am now completely and utterly lost. I have no idea what you are saying or
how any of it is relevant to the http-range-14 issue. Want to try running it
past me again? Bear in mind that I do not accept your claim that a description
of something is in
Before I comment, I just want to summarise my understanding because
http-range-14 is a weird term;
I understand it as the range-14 issue that when you use 302 to redirect
from a URI-A to a URL-B we have a convention that URL-B has some
relationship to URI-A but it's not defined, we don't
Dear all,
As you will be aware OKCon 2011 is approaching fast: June, 30th July, 1st
We are delighted to announce the release of the OKCon 2011 programme:
http://okcon.org/2011/programme
We are also thrilled about the fantastic line up of speakers:
On 13 Jun 2011, at 09:59, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
The real problem seems to me that making resolvable, HTTP URIs for real world
things was a clever but dirty hack and does not make any semantic sense.
Well, you worry about *real-world things*, but even people who just worry about
On 6/13/11 12:41 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 13 Jun 2011, at 09:59, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
The real problem seems to me that making resolvable, HTTP URIs for real world
things was a clever but dirty hack and does not make any semantic sense.
Well, you worry about *real-world
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:51 PM, William Waites wrote:
* [2011-06-12 22:52:18 -0700] Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us écrit:
] OK, I am now completely and utterly lost. I have no idea what you
] are saying or how any of it is relevant to the http-range-14 issue.
] Want to try running it past me
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:50 AM, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 05:51 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
David, as you know, it is trivial to distinguish in representation the
difference between an information object and a person.
Correct. And that distinction is
10 matches
Mail list logo
