Hello Yusniel,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 07:03:18PM -0400, Yusniel Hidalgo Delgado wrote:
In the previous message sent by Michael, he said that the endpoint SPARQL is
updated once per day. I guess that the approach used in the project is a
batch update approach. I am very interested in the
Hi Everyone,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Andrea Splendiani
andrea.splendi...@iscb.org wrote:
Il giorno 18/apr/2013, alle ore 16:04, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com ha scritto:
On 4/18/13 9:23 AM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:
Hi,
I think that some caching with a minimum of
Hi KIngsley
Where would you suggest putting the rdfs:isDefinedBy links? If they are in the
ontology, then presumably by the time you read them you already know which
ontology you are looking at, no?
Pat
On Apr 29, 2013, at 5:44 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 4/29/13 6:18 PM, Margaret Warren
Hi Tom,
Yes I have been discussing with Stéphane as well. Hopefully we can get
things going.
About the willingness to participate, if we make the system open enough
(but with spam control) then we really don't need to be setting goals about
the community's willingness to participate. It will
On 4/30/13 11:28 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
Hi KIngsley
Where would you suggest putting the rdfs:isDefinedBy links? If they are in the
ontology, then presumably by the time you read them you already know which
ontology you are looking at, no?
Pat,
The benefit of these relations is all about the
Kingsley
OK, I get it. Yes, we can add this. Thanks for the feedback.
Pat
On Apr 30, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 4/30/13 11:28 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
Hi KIngsley
Where would you suggest putting the rdfs:isDefinedBy links? If they are in
the ontology, then presumably by
On 4/30/13 12:51 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
Hi Tom,
Yes I have been discussing with Stéphane as well. Hopefully we can get
things going.
About the willingness to participate, if we make the system open
enough (but with spam control) then we really don't need to be setting
goals about the
Kingsley,
Hold on I don't get it. We're talking about the entry-point for Linked Data
information, which is linkeddata.org
Of course then we will link to other resources and sites (just as the site
is doing now). I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to.
What problem are you trying to
Hi Yury, Luca, all,
There's a separate, off-list thread going on at the moment with
Stéphane Corlosquet, who has offered to help maintain the site (and
now has admin rights) -- thanks Stéphane!
You're right, the site is very stale. As I've said many times before,
I'm open to any suggestions
Sounds interesting, but still a bit unclear. Do you have concrete examples
of how would this (the new linkeddata.org) look like?
Are you proposing a linkeddata.org entry point which is basically Linked
Data resource in itself which links to other Linked Data resources? All of
which is about Linked
hi luca, here are my 2 cents.
what i would do with a domain like = linkeddata.org = is :
option 1 (preferred).
- take the opportunity to get to know virtuoso, use the sioc
capabilities, write sioc blog with nice vsp templates.
- take the opportunity to learn about webID and apply ACLs to the
On 4/30/13 6:25 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
Sounds interesting, but still a bit unclear.
It is about dropping files into folders as a pattern for Web
publication. The documents in question would be comprised of RDF model
based structured data, ideally.
Do you have concrete examples of how
12 matches
Mail list logo
