Hello Kingsley Idehen,
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 05:32:00PM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
We don't need a central repository of anything. Linked Data is supposed
to be about enhancing serendipitous discovery of relevant things.
Serendipitous discovery ? I guess you are not talking about
There may be a number of reasons for creating a central list and I am sure
there are others. In this case I wasn't suggesting it as a bureaucratic and
technical exercise. My reason for suggesting it was for the following.
1. It is a chance to celebrate and highlight progress in making RDF and
Great! Are they actively on this list?
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
Excerpts from Dominic Oldman's message of 2013-06-24 07:50:58 +:
Just a quick aside - I have noticed that I haven't seen any posts from women
members.
Is this because there aren't any, or very few?
I was just wondering why that was and how we could individually, and as a
group,
, it actually feels strange talking just because I am a woman ...
but here I am if that is of any comfort :)
Muriel
btw. I occasionally answer (most of the time off list probably). And I do
not feel awkward doing so IF I feel I have something to say. So do not feel
guilty :)
On Mon, Jun
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Isabelle Augenstein
i.augenst...@sheffield.ac.uk wrote:
- Overall, most discussions on the list seem to be rather philosophical
(What is Linked Data? Does Linked Data require RDF?), which are not the
kind of discussions I was hoping for when I joined the list
On 6/23/2013 12:16 PM, Barry Norton wrote:
Dominic, I think this is a great idea - the W3C lists suffer both from
senescence and fatigue (i.e., they're out-of-date and seem not to get
refreshed with new examples).
May I be presumptuous enough to offer to help/steal from the EUCLID
project,
On 24 June 2013 10:34, Isabelle Augenstein i.augenst...@sheffield.ac.ukwrote:
Hi Dominic,
I only joined the list a few months ago, so my observations might be
inaccurate, but
- Overall, most discussions on the list seem to be rather philosophical
(What is Linked Data? Does Linked Data
Hi all,
My two other female colleagues and me are also subscribed to the list and
have posted occasionally about our projects when it requires feedback from
the community...however we haven't actively taken part in discussions.
But, thanks for making us heard ;)
Thanks.
Regards,
Amrapali Zaveri
I'm also female and fairly new to the list...
I joined the list because I've recently started work on the Linking Web
data for Education (LinkedUp project) [http://linkedup-project.eu] which
aims to encourage use of linked and open data in particular by
educational institutions and
On 24/06/2013 11:22, Barry Norton wrote:
That said, what I'd like to do is to send an email to each new poster
and invite them to fill out a form with their confirmed preferred
name, volunteered other identities (Twitter handle, etc.) and now I'm
thinking gender.
Would people find this very
Hi Andreas, Prateek,
Very good points that you make about trust and domains.
In fact specific domains like the biology one or the culture one (see
lodlam.net) try to address these issues in much more specific terms and
business models that what would be discussed on this public-lod list.
So
Ahoy o/
I would like to figure out how we (general human population) can express our
skill sets as LD. As well as our *intention* to #skillshare - learn and teach
(or I prefer to see the second as *assisting others with learning*)
I see various online services where people can create profile
On 24 June 2013 05:05, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
I hope you realize that the point of that thought experiment is to ensure
that the technology in question is sufficiently powerful and flexible, so
that *if* a parallel technology were discovered, the two could be extended
to
On 6/24/13 2:14 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello Kingsley Idehen,
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 05:32:00PM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
We don't need a central repository of anything. Linked Data is supposed
to be about enhancing serendipitous discovery of relevant things.
Serendipitous
Why fill out a form?
Should they just give you a URI? :)
On Monday, June 24, 2013, Barry Norton wrote:
On 24/06/13 10:14, Dan Brickley wrote:
There are just over 1000 subscribers to the list (no gender figures
available for those). You can see from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**
Excerpts from Juan Sequeda's message of 2013-06-24 12:56:47 +:
Why fill out a form?
Should they just give you a URI? :)
+1 :)
if given URI doesn't provide expected information, then one could show a
fallback from + generate proper RDF + show instructions on how to publish it on
given
I read the list too and also have some of the same sentiments as the other
women - I don't feel particularly compelled to comment in discussions.
Michael Brunnbauer and Pat Hayes work on our team and offer far more useful
comments to the on-going discussions, but I do learn a lot (occasionally
On 6/24/13 2:44 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 6:23 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I agree with the relevance of the effort, and wouldn't argue against
centralizing. Not everyone will have the resource to search in a decentralized
fashion...
What worries me a bit is how to
On 24/06/13 13:44, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
As you've indicated, there have been many attempts at this over the
years and they never take-off or meet their goals etc.. The problem is
that a different approach is required. Basically, in this scenario lies
a simple Linked Data publication usecase
Hi,
I am one of the female lurkers. I am working on a project that is attempting to
pull together some of the health/medical datasets. I may have posted once or
twice when looking for some information. Generally, I have not posted because
I wasn't sure if there was an official organization or
Spell Checkers, because there are some jobs Web Visionaries just won't do.
Unpaid volunteers have a plan for World Domination and it includes nice
penmanship too :-)
Reusing patterns does make it easier for tools to aggregate and present
data. The perfect might be the enemy of the good, but
On 6/24/13 9:12 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
On 6/24/13 2:44 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 6:23 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I agree with the relevance of the effort, and wouldn't argue against
centralizing. Not everyone will have the resource to search in a
decentralized
On 6/24/13 10:12 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
You were talking about serendipitous discovery without central
repositories.
Yes I am. I've been talking about it for a long time [1].
Michael,
I forgot to add a link section.
[1] http://bit.ly/TWw4Ck -- about SDQ (Serendipitous Discovery
On Jun 23, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
Hi folks,
A couple of years ago I got the idea of finding alternatives to the
official definition of RDF, especially the semantics. I've always
found the official docs less than crystal clear, and have always
harbored the suspicion that
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Adrian Walker adriandwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Gregg,
Interesting.
You may like the example
www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RDFQueryLangComparison1.agent
For the non-aggregation parts of the example, the formal semantics in effect
are described
Hello Kingsley,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:12:43AM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Sorry for PGP-signing my last couple of mails. I guess this is not good
practice on mailing lists.
I sign my emails using an X.509 certificate that includes a person URI
in its SAN slot :-)
Hmm... if your
All,
FYI.
Original Message
Subject:[Dbpedia-discussion] New DBpedia Overview Article Available
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:03:05 +0200
From: Jens Lehmann lehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de
To: dbpedia-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net
Dear all,
we are pleased
On 6/24/13 11:05 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello Kingsley,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:12:43AM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Sorry for PGP-signing my last couple of mails. I guess this is not good
practice on mailing lists.
I sign my emails using an X.509 certificate that includes a person
Hi Kinsgley
we are pleased to announce that a new overview article for DBpedia is
available:http://svn.aksw.org/papers/2013/SWJ_DBpedia/public.pdf
Ummm.. Is this link (URL) really public?
Thanks for sharing.
Ghislain
--
Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
Campus
On 6/24/13 10:32 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
If you can give up on all this, what do you take yourself to be referring to when you say
RDF ? You have just dismissed virtually every defining characteristic of RDF
as either wrong or inessential. So what is left?
Pat
I am going to create a poll aimed
With all the concurrent, separate and interrelated threads on semantic web and
RDF can anyone please tell me if there are some good overview articles on RDF
and logical and mathematical models and frameworks for modelling linked data
which includes the Semantic web and RDF and (all) other
Hello,
I would like to publish some statistical data. A few of these numbers
are percentages. What is the best way to make it clear to data consumers
that the numbers are to be treated as percentages? As far as I can tell,
the XSD data types do not suffice.
Regards,
Frans Knibbe
Frans, I think you may be interested in the W3C RDF Data Cube
vocabulary: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/
Abstract: There are many situations where it would be useful to be
able to publish multi-dimensional data, such as statistics, on the web
in such a way that it can be linked to related
Dear Milton,
just off the cuff (I hope this was the level of analysis you were looking for):
RDF and semantic web
in my opinion, this is a good article about the linking of RDF with ontologies
and so, in a sense, between the linked-data and semantic-web communities*:
Hi Frans,
On 24/06/13 17:37, Frans Knibbe | Geodan wrote:
Hello,
I would like to publish some statistical data. A few of these numbers
are percentages. What is the best way to make it clear to data consumers
that the numbers are to be treated as percentages? As far as I can tell,
the XSD data
Am 24.06.2013 18:28, schrieb Ghislain Atemezing:
Hi Kinsgley
we are pleased to announce that a new overview article for DBpedia is
available:http://svn.aksw.org/papers/2013/SWJ_DBpedia/public.pdf
Ummm.. Is this link (URL) really public?
The official submission is available here:
On Jun 24, 2013, at 12:28, Ghislain Atemezing auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr
wrote:
Hi Kinsgley
we are pleased to announce that a new overview article for DBpedia is
available:http://svn.aksw.org/papers/2013/SWJ_DBpedia/public.pdf
Ummm.. Is this link (URL) really public?
I can get to the
Hi elf,
some time ago I co-designed the Cognitive Characteristics Ontology [1]
as extension/addition to FOAF to express cognitive characteristics,
e.g., skills. You can find various examples in the examples section [2]
of the ontology specification documentation that include skill
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
Hi, and thanks for the comments. FYI I have some draft articles in
the can that will add clarity and detail, I hope. In the meantime ...
On Jun 23, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
Hi folks,
A couple of years ago I
On 06/24/2013 09:45 AM, Bonnie MacKellar wrote:
Hi,
I am one of the female lurkers. I am working on a project that is
attempting to pull together some of the health/medical datasets. I may
have posted once or twice when looking for some information. Generally,
I have not posted because I
David - try
http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/dbpedia-large-scale-multilingual-knowledge-base-extracted-wikipedia
P.
On 6/24/2013 2:52 PM, David Wood wrote:
On Jun 24, 2013, at 12:28, Ghislain Atemezing auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr
wrote:
Hi Kinsgley
we are pleased to announce
On Jun 24, 2013, at 15:35, Pascal Hitzler pascal.hitz...@wright.edu wrote:
David - try
http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/dbpedia-large-scale-multilingual-knowledge-base-extracted-wikipedia
That works. Thanks, Pascal.
Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood
P.
On
Hi Bonnie,
On Jun 24, 2013, at 15:20, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
On 06/24/2013 09:45 AM, Bonnie MacKellar wrote:
Hi,
I am one of the female lurkers. I am working on a project that is
attempting to pull together some of the health/medical datasets. I may
have posted once or twice
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/24/13 10:32 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
If you can give up on all this, what do you take yourself to be referring
to when you say RDF ? You have just dismissed virtually every defining
characteristic of RDF as
All,
I've taken the time to embellish TimBL's original WWW proposal
illustration with Linked Data URIs [1].
Why?
Because, it seems to be unclear (to many) if the original WWW design had
Linked Data in mind all along.
My claim and long standing position:
The original WWW design always had
On 24 June 2013 21:56, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
All,
I've taken the time to embellish TimBL's original WWW proposal
illustration with Linked Data URIs [1].
Why?
Because, it seems to be unclear (to many) if the original WWW design had
Linked Data in mind all along.
On 6/24/13 3:52 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/24/13 10:32 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
If you can give up on all this, what do you take yourself to be referring
to when you say RDF ? You have just dismissed virtually
On 24-6-2013 19:16, John Erickson wrote:
Frans, I think you may be interested in the W3C RDF Data Cube
vocabulary: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/
Thanks John. I am already trying to use the Data Cube vocabulary.
Although I am not a statistician I think it is a great vocabulary,
enabling
Kingsley, how about being crystal clear of HTTP as well then? Isn't that an
implementation detail just as your understanding of RDF within Linked
Data is?
- sorry for unleashing hell again
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.comwrote:
On 24 June 2013
On 24 June 2013 15:45, Bonnie MacKellar macke...@stjohns.edu wrote:
Hi,
** **
I am one of the female lurkers. I am working on a project that is
attempting to pull together some of the health/medical datasets. I may have
posted once or twice when looking for some information.
Hello Dave,
Thank you! I think the QUDT definition was just what I was looking for.
I was aware of the QUDT vocabulary but I guess I did not expect to find
percentage defined there because I did not consider it a unit.
I am using multi-measure observations, but I think I can manage with not
On 6/24/13 4:24 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
Kingsley, how about being crystal clear of HTTP as well then? Isn't
that an implementation detail just as your understanding of RDF
within Linked Data is?
- sorry for unleashing hell again
There is not hell being unleashed. When did asking questions
All,
As promised, here is a simple poll [1] that seeks an answer to the
question: what are RDF's unique characteristics?
Links:
[1] http://poll.fm/4adcd -- new poll about RDF's unique selling points
or defining characteristics.
[2] http://bit.ly/19m0Yhh -- older poll about biggest
Exactly. And for me Linked Data is defined by those set of implementation
details (HTTP, RDF, URIs and SPARQL).
The only difference between my understanding and yours is that you think
that you can still produce valid Linked Data even without HTTP (using your
own URI resolver), whilst I think you
On 24 Jun 2013, at 21:52, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
All,
As promised, here is a simple poll [1] that seeks an answer to the question:
what are RDF's unique characteristics?
The poll says Distinguishing, not unique.
I think these are quite different.
Are you going to
Kingsley,
Let me give a shot to your question about the unique characteristics of RDF
1) RDF is based on the idea that the things being described have properties
which have values, and that resources can be described by making statements
2) A Statement is modeled as a Triple (mathematically a
second link give me an
Access denied.
You must be logged in to see that page.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
All,
As promised, here is a simple poll [1] that seeks an answer to the
question: what are RDF's unique characteristics?
Links:
On 6/24/13 5:29 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
Exactly. And for me Linked Data is defined by those set of
implementation details (HTTP, RDF, URIs and SPARQL).
And that's absolutely fine. Nothing wrong with that. You only hit issues
if you mandate that to someone who seeks to pursue the same goal
On 6/24/13 5:44 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
On 24 Jun 2013, at 21:52, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
All,
As promised, here is a simple poll [1] that seeks an answer to the question:
what are RDF's unique characteristics?
The poll says Distinguishing, not unique.
I think these
Apologies for cross-posting.
Please forward to interested parties.
***
Deadline extended!
---
Call
On 6/24/13 5:54 PM, Marco Neumann wrote:
second link give me an
Access denied..
You must be logged in to see that page.
Thanks for spotting that. Let me double check.
Kingsley
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/24/13 5:54 PM, Marco Neumann wrote:
second link give me an
Access denied..
You must be logged in to see that page.
Alternative Link: http://bit.ly/SqOUTu .
Kingsley
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
***Post-doctoral Researchers / Research Group Leaders***
at Uni Bonn / Fraunhofer IAIS
The department Enterprise Information Systems (EIS) [1] at the Institute
for Applied Computer Science [2] at University of Bonn [3] and
Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent
On 24 June 2013 14:31, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/24/13 2:14 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello Kingsley Idehen,
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 05:32:00PM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
We don't need a central repository of anything. Linked Data is supposed
to be about
Hi Kingsley,
On 24 Jun 2013, at 22:59, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/24/13 5:44 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
On 24 Jun 2013, at 21:52, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
All,
As promised, here is a simple poll [1] that seeks an answer to the
question: what
W3C's hosting a workshop on interface definitions for RDF data.
If you want to tell users how to use some RDF service, or find out how
to use an existing service, you need some mechanism for defining
interfaces. If you then want to mechanically complete client data or
validate graphs posted to a
On 6/24/13 7:12 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Hi Kingsley,
On 24 Jun 2013, at 22:59, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/24/13 5:44 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
On 24 Jun 2013, at 21:52, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
All,
As promised, here is a simple poll [1] that
On 6/24/13 7:00 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
On 24 June 2013 14:31, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/24/13 2:14 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello Kingsley Idehen,
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 05:32:00PM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
We don't need a central repository of anything.
On Jun 24, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
Hi, and thanks for the comments. FYI I have some draft articles in
the can that will add clarity and detail, I hope. In the meantime ...
On Jun 23, 2013, at 11:49 AM,
On 06/22/2013 04:47 AM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
What it means now, or at any point in time, must be inclusive to new
in-development or in-use things, other wise it will never mean anything
else later down the line.
If you want it to mean a very specific set of things at any one time,
then take
71 matches
Mail list logo
