Hi Isabelle and Kate,
I agree with you regarding the very detailed threads on RDF, and because those
threads have lasted for quite along time I also didn't really participate in
the list until recently. However, I think the list could potentially be more
diverse in its questions and
On 25 June 2013 06:19, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
On 06/22/2013 04:47 AM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
What it means now, or at any point in time, must be inclusive to new
in-development or in-use things, other wise it will never mean anything
else later down the line.
If you want it to
On 22 June 2013 20:01, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Hi Melvin,
I wouldn't really say that Tabulator was suitable for general non
technical users.
I just clicked on the link, and apart from getting endless windows with
Couldn't set callback for redirects: TypeError: 'undefined' is
On 6/25/13 12:19 AM, David Booth wrote:
The problem is that some people are claiming that RDF is not a
*necessary* component of Linked Data.
Loosely coupled does not mean *not necessary* it means what it says
i.e., RDF and Linked Data are loosely coupled. It isn't an all or
nothing
On 6/25/13 12:19 AM, David Booth wrote:
Similarly, can you show me an existing alternative to RDF, that allows
applications to automatically meaningfully combine independently
authored data, without out-of-band knowledge of that data? Perhaps
alternatives to URIs and RDF exist in theory, but I
On 6/24/13 4:22 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 9:12 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
On 6/24/13 2:44 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 6:23 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I agree with the relevance of the effort, and wouldn't argue against
centralizing. Not everyone will have the
On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:19 AM, David Booth wrote:
In fact, as long as a standard mapping to the RDF model is available, *any*
document format can be interpreted as RDF.
Ahah!
So, if a standard mapping to the RDF model is available for my
chosen data publication format -- which I may choose
On 06/25/2013 11:14 AM, Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote:
On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:19 AM, David Booth wrote:
The problem is that some people are claiming that RDF is not a
*necessary* component of Linked Data.
Let me try this --
Is *SPARQL* a *necessary* component of Linked Data?
In other words, must
On 6/25/13 12:49 PM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
On 6/24/13 4:22 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 9:12 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
On 6/24/13 2:44 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 6:23 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I agree with the relevance of the effort, and wouldn't argue
against
On 06/25/2013 01:30 PM, Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote:
On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:19 AM, David Booth wrote:
In fact, as long as a standard mapping to the RDF model is
available, *any* document format can be interpreted as RDF.
Ahah!
So, if a standard mapping to the RDF model is available for my
Hi list,
Just posted a article at http://blog.mobileink.com/ that may be of
interest to members of the list. It's a fairly detailed formal
definition of what I'm calling a Triad calculus (or logic or
language) that I believe could be used to define RDF-like languages
very concisely,
On 6/25/13 2:13 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
Hi list,
Just posted a article at http://blog.mobileink.com/ that may be of
interest to members of the list. It's a fairly detailed formal
definition of what I'm calling a Triad calculus (or logic or
language) that I believe could be used to define
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
...snip
Well, its a formal, artificial, language, and it comes with a semantics as
part of its definition. Just like many other logics in many logic textbooks,
many programming languages, etc.. So yes, I guess it does
On Jun 25, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
...snip
Well, its a formal, artificial, language, and it comes with a semantics as
part of its definition. Just like many other logics in many logic textbooks,
many
Given his responses on the public-lod list, I think he's blowing smoke.
-Original Message-
From: ontolog-forum-boun...@ontolog.cim3.net [mailto:ontolog-forum-
boun...@ontolog.cim3.net] On Behalf Of Kingsley Idehen
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:19 PM
To: public-lod@w3.org; [ontolog-forum]
Antoine,
Thanks for this.
Yes, the W3C list does seem to be a good place. I will look at this further
and get back to you. Thanks for pointing these resources out.
Cheers,
Dominic
From: Antoine Isaac ais...@few.vu.nl
To: public-lod@w3.org
Sent:
In the two dozen plus separate and related threads linked to the issue of the
relationship between LD and RDF, I have noted that we assume as self-evident
that Linked Data presupposes the World Wide Web, and that the Internet as we
know it is the ONLY possible platform for linking data.
In
17 matches
Mail list logo
