On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
pfpschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
RDF includes a meaning for triples.
I think this is your biggest misconception. RDF does not include any
meaning of anything. It's a framework that is entirely unbiased about
what you define. The meaning of
On Apr 13, 2014 7:13 AM, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
pfpschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
RDF includes a meaning for triples.
I think this is your biggest misconception. RDF does not include any
meaning of anything. It's a
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Simon Spero sesunc...@gmail.com wrote:
Whilst Peter may have some memory lapses about some ambiguous parts of the
OWL spec :), I do not believe that he has false memories of co-editing the
second edition of the RDF Semantics document.
On 4/13/14 5:12 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Simon Spero sesunc...@gmail.com wrote:
Whilst Peter may have some memory lapses about some ambiguous parts of the
OWL spec :), I do not believe that he has false memories of co-editing the
second edition of the RDF
On Apr 13, 2014, at 6:10 AM, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
pfpschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
RDF includes a meaning for triples.
I think this is your biggest misconception. RDF does not include any
meaning of anything.
Well,
