Hi
You may be interested in the rich dataset statistics that are reported as part
of the Health Care and Life Sciences Community Profile for dataset
descriptions; these extend the properties given in the VoID vocabulary.
https://www.w3.org/TR/hcls-dataset/#s6_6
The linked section gives a
Hi
Option 3 seems sensible, particularly if you keep them in separate graphs.
However shouldn’t you consider the provenance of the sources and prioritise
them on how recent they were updated?
Alasdair
On 8 Jun 2016, at 13:06, Martynas Jusevičius
Hi Aidan, Ismael
You should look into what the IVOA semantics working group are doing
http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/IvoaSemantics
Alasdair J G Gray
Fellow of the Higher Education Academy
Assistant Professor in Computer Science
Herriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
The 5th Scottish Linked Data Interest Group Workshop (SLiDInG5) will take place
in Edinburgh on Thursday 9 July 2015, co-located with the 30th British
International Conference on Databases.
The workshop is free to attend and provides a forum for highlighting the latest
advances in Linked Data
I think you would find that the original dataset tends to be the
void:subjectsTarget but with symmetric properties it doesn't really matter.
What you really need is a provenance model of how the data was generated.
Alasdair J G Gray
http://www.orcid.org/-0002-5711-4872
On 26 Jan 2015
On 23 Jan 2015, at 17:59, Hugh Glaser
h...@glasers.orgmailto:h...@glasers.org wrote:
On 23 Jan 2015, at 16:23, Stian Soiland-Reyes
soiland-re...@cs.manchester.ac.ukmailto:soiland-re...@cs.manchester.ac.uk
wrote:
[snip]
But I guess for OpenPHACTS this doesn’t apply, since I understand from
Deadline extended to 14 July 2014
Apologies for cross-posting
---
International Workshop on Context, Interpretation and Meaning (CIM2014)
http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~fm206/cim14/
19 or 20 October 2014
Riva del Garda, Trentino, Italy
