Stones.
http://3roundstones.com/
Regards,
James Leigh
We are pleased to announce the release of Callimachus 1.2.
Callimachus 1.2 can be downloaded at our website:
http://callimachusproject.org
Callimachus is an Open Source system for navigating, managing,
visualizing and building applications on Linked Data. Callimachus is
currently used by
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 19:23 +0100, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi James,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:15 AM, James Leigh ja...@3roundstones.com wrote:
Could this 308 (Permanent Redirect) give us a way to cache a probe URI's
definition document location?
An issue people have with httpRange-14
Could this 308 (Permanent Redirect) give us a way to cache a probe URI's
definition document location?
An issue people have with httpRange-14 is that 303 redirects can't be
cached. If we could agree to use a 308 response as a cache-able
alternative to 303, we could reduce server load and speed
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 08:11 +, Jeni Tennison wrote:
Can I just cast that into the language used by the rest of the proposal? What
about:
when documentation is served with a 200 response from a probe
URI and does not contain a 'describedby' statement, some agents
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:43 +, Jeni Tennison wrote:
Thanks James,
I've substituted that text in.
Thanks,
The document makes it unclear how an agent should handle provenance for
NIR URI with a 200 response.
If a :describedby relationship exists, should an agent assume that the
object
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 16:12 +, Hugh Glaser wrote:
So my question here is to people who have built a real app that consumes LD,
by which I mean something in use every day by someone other than the builder
and their friends - preferably where someone paid you to do it.
***Would your
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 19:49 +, Jeni Tennison wrote:
James,
On 23 Mar 2012, at 19:23, James Leigh wrote:
I am not saying everyone should care to distinguish them (real data will
always be dirty), but using the same identifier for both the person and
the document should
Hi Jeni,
Thanks for your response.
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 21:42 +, Jeni Tennison wrote:
The big thing that *is* different under this proposal is that if you have an
HTML+RDFa 1.1 document like:
!DOCTYPE html
html
head
base href=http://example.org/me/
link rel=stylesheet
/2010/11/status-code-200-vs-303.html
Cheers,
James
--
James Leigh Services Inc.
http://www.leighnet.ca/
http://jamesrdf.blogspot.com/
Archer's 210 status code (http://philarcher.org/diary/303/) would
also work it this case too. I will add that the 210 response would be
even better if the client could ask for it using the expect header.
Regards,
James
--
James Leigh Services Inc.
http://www.leighnet.ca/
http
11 matches
Mail list logo
