Hi Armando,
On 4 Jul 2014, at 10:52, Armando Stellato stell...@info.uniroma2.it wrote:
I would like to get confirmed is if the definition of void:Dataset is
including owl vocabularies.
Yes, it would be fair to say that owl:Ontology is a subset of void:Dataset,
because every such ontology can
Hi Leon,
On 7 Apr 2014, at 10:45, Leon Derczynski l...@dcs.shef.ac.uk wrote:
1. What should be found when one visits a grounding URI? Is there some
special content negotiation in this scenario, e.g. a default Content-Type or
an expected range of supported Accept-Encoding values?
A good
On 18 May 2013, at 11:26, Michael Brunnbauer bru...@netestate.de wrote:
One criteria that agents might apply when conducting Follow Your
Nose consumption of Linked Data ...
I am interested in examples of such agents that are not crawlers or semantic
web browsers.
These should qualify: Both
Given that the operators of this service claim that we can “trust them to do
the right thing”, I find it disappointing that they re-invented their own
integer literals rather than re-using existing identifiers such as those from
Linked Open Numbers.
Other than that, looks like a great service.
On 1 Apr 2013, at 15:32, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
In which case we can probably get rid of the ':' too?
And the domain name too? Everything good is on facebook.com anyways.
Richard
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com
wrote:
That
You could do worse than using a W3C Direct Mapping [1] representation of the
INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables [2].
The Revelytix RDB Schema Ontology [3] comes close, but AFAIK doesn't cover
everything you need (FKs, indexes).
Best,
Richard
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/
[2]
On 24 Mar 2013, at 17:39, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Thus, if a client de-references the URI
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama and it gets a 200 OK from the
server combined with http://dbpedia.org/page/Barack_Obama in the
Content-Location response header, the
On 20 Nov 2012, at 13:48, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
http://lod-cloud.net/state/
What's the update frequency of this effort?
Roughly once a year. It's a volunteer effort, so can be delayed based on
departure of people etc
Best,
Richard
Hi Paul,
On 9 Nov 2012, at 15:44, Paul Gearon wrote:
Triples don't belong to a graph per se, but in general it's fine for the
same triple to appear in more than one graph.
True.
The exception to this is for those triples that contain a blank node. In that
case it may be possible to have
Hi Leigh,
I can see the appeal and time-saving potential — “Just take this damn flowchart
and get out of my office!” ;-)
On 25 Oct 2012, at 15:08, Leigh Dodds wrote:
As an exercise I drafted a table (available in a Google Spreadsheet
[1]) to start mapping out some guidance for Equivalence
On 21 Oct 2012, at 14:08, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
I have created quite number of examples using EasyRdf:
https://github.com/njh/easyrdf/tree/master/examples
But I would like to create a more complete real-world example, demonstrating
how to publish Linked Data, as part of a PHP website.
Today we have released D2RQ v0.8.1.
D2RQ is an open-source system for accessing relational databases as virtual,
read-only RDF graphs. Using D2RQ you can query relational databases using
SPARQL, access their contents as Linked Data over the Web, create custom dumps
of the database for loading
On 6 Jun 2012, at 14:04, Antoine Isaac wrote:
By the way, I've tried to update our DataHub entry at
http://thedatahub.org/dataset/stitch-rameau, fitting decommissioned
somewhere. I've just added it as a tag for now, I did not know which other
fields I could use.
A tag is fine.
Best,
On 31 May 2012, at 09:02, Rufus Pollock wrote:
You can definitely keep the dataset entry on CKAN there. We don't have
it now but one could introduce a special state of archived which
would then mean that the entry was kept but clearly marked as
archived.
+1 to a new state for this. Maybe call
Bradley,
On 30 May 2012, at 23:03, Bradley Allen wrote:
I'm regret to say that I'd already nuked the CKAN record by the time this
email reached me
CKAN doesn't actually nuke things that are deleted, it just hides them from
view and they can be restored, which I just did for the t4gm dataset:
On 23 May 2012, at 18:05, Tim rdf wrote:
How do you decide the primary tag if multiple are given?
Randomly. So it's probably better if you choose and specify only one.
Best,
Richard
Thanks,
Tim Lebo
[1]
We're proud to announce the release of D2RQ v0.8.
D2RQ is an open-source system for database-to-RDF mapping. It makes the
contents of relational databases accessible as SPARQL endpoints, as Linked
Data, and as RDF dumps.
http://d2rq.org/
New features in this version include preliminary
On 17 Feb 2012, at 23:14, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
In general, the RDFa embedded
metadata approach can be replaced by using the link element href in XHTML
to pointing to an external RDF document, where the rel=”meta” attribute can
be used to indicate a relationship between resources.
Yes, but
Armando, in many cases it's not practicable because the base URI usually
already denotes something else. For example, for concept schemes it is common
to use the base URI as the identifier for the skos:ConceptScheme resource. If
that's not so in your case then there's nothing wrong with using
On 2 Feb 2012, at 23:58, Bernard Vatant wrote:
More than 60 [vocabularies] are either 404, time out or access denied, which
does not come as a surprise, but is nevertheless a big issue. It means that
data using those vocabularies are relying on semantics no one can check.
The rest is
Congrats, this is awesome.
So you're automatically harvesting 200+ datasets by starting with the LOD Cloud
metadata we're collecting on the Data Hub (ex CKAN), leading to a total of
almost 2B triples.
Also fascinating is the list of 250 datasets that couldn't be automatically
harvested due to
On 2 Feb 2012, at 11:04, Sören Auer wrote:
A demo installation collecting statistics from all LOD datasets
registered on CKAN is available from:
http://stats.lod2.eu
One more thing. Can I search for the stats for a particular datasets somehow?
Let's say I want to see the stats for the
, such as a URL to a
demo/screencast or slides.
Please submit proposals via EasyChair at:
http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=www2012dev
Inquiries can be sent to:
develop...@www2012.org
Track chairs:
Raphaël Troncy, EURECOM, France
Richard Cyganiak, DERI, NUI Galway, Ireland
Hi Yury,
On 1 Dec 2011, at 11:44, Yury Katkov wrote:
Another question is about species themselves: have anybody seen the
information about species distribution in structured or
semi-structured forms? In other words the information about where the
animals and plants live. I know only
On 1 Dec 2011, at 00:43, Tim rdf wrote:
1) Which page should be used as the authoritative description of the
metadata that the lodcloud CKAN group requires/recognizes?
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/lodcloud/ckan/validator/levels.html
or
Hi Steffen,
On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:34, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
MUTO should thus not be considered as yet another tagging ontology but as a
unification of existing approaches.
I'm curious why you decided not to include mappings (equivalentClass,
subProperty etc) to the existing approaches.
Thanks for posting this Ivan.
I may have crashed the site :-( I was playing around with the SPARQL endpoint,
which doesn't support SPARQL 1.1, mostly returns Gateway Timeouts, and
eventually stopped working altogether, taking the site with it. :-(
SPARQL store performance aside, this is an
On 28 Oct 2011, at 21:28, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
The paper can be read in the Google Cache:
… or not. My web-fu is weak today and Google refuses to give me a link that can
both works and is shorter than half a page of text.
Try googling for Zhishi.me, there's an iswc.semanticweb.org link
Dear list,
We all know that data publishers *should* publish their data along with an
explicit license that explains what kind of re-use is allowed.
Can anyone suggest a good reference/link/URL that makes this case? A blog post
or advocacy site or similar?
Bonus points if it has specific
On 23 Sep 2011, at 15:11, Tim rdf wrote:
Why does http://graph.facebook.com/24407945# not resolve to anything,
bash-3.2$ curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' http://graph.facebook.com/24407945#
Hash URIs are resolved by stripping the hash off the URI first. The hash and
anything behind it is never
Richard Cyganiak (DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Galway, Ireland)
Arofan Gregory (ODaF - Open Data Foundation, Tucson, Arizona, USA)
Wendy L. Thomas (MPC - Minnesota Population Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)
Joachim Wackerow (GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
Antoine,
On 23 Jun 2011, at 07:27, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
I started a list here: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Bad_Crawlers
What's the use of this list?
Assume it stays empty, as you hope. What's the use?
That should be obvious.
Assume it gets filled with names: so what? It does not prove
On 16 Jun 2011, at 07:05, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
I think that we are beyond the point where that kind of extremely
idealised account is useful for evaluating web technologies.
We will agree to disagree then. Perhaps in another thread you will say
what *will* be useful for evaluating web
On 15 Jun 2011, at 23:54, Francois-Paul Servant wrote:
And here you and Pat and Alan (and TimBL, for that matter) are preaching
that we can't use this one billion of fantastic free URIs to identify things
because it wouldn't make semantic sense.
do you mean that it's OK to use wikipedia
On 15 Jun 2011, at 12:35, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
ah, it's owned because the community agrees that is the way we work, it's not
a legal ownership. That was my confusion.
That's one side. There is a legal argument too. Gross oversimplification: You
can own URIs because you can own domain
On 15 Jun 2011, at 12:01, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
https://graph.facebook.com/kidehen#this
Would you agree that Facebook are the owners of this URI?
I would say they own the URI: https://graph.facebook.com/kidehen
I use that URI as the basis for a disambiguated URI in my data space, for
On 13 Jun 2011, at 20:51, David Booth wrote:
http://richard.cyganiak.de/
a foaf:Document;
dc:title Richard Cyganiak's homepage;
a foaf:Person;
foaf:name Richard Cyganiak;
owl:sameAs http://twitter.com/cygri;
.
That should be fine for applications that do not need
On 13 Jun 2011, at 00:20, Pat Hayes wrote:
What do we say when the range of a property is supposed to be, say,
people, but its considered OK to insert a string to stand in place of the
person?
Well, I can define a class that contains both people (in the foaf:Person
sense) and names of
;
a foaf:Person;
foaf:name Richard Cyganiak;
owl:sameAs http://twitter.com/cygri;
.
There.
If your knowledge representation formalism isn't smart enough to make sense of
that, then it may just not be quite ready for the web, and you may have some
work to do.
Best,
Richard
Hi Pat,
On 12 Jun 2011, at 00:33, Pat Hayes wrote:
Nothing is gained from the range assertions. They should be dropped.
They capture a part of the schema.org documentation: the “expected type” of
each property. That part of the documentation would be lost. Conversely,
nothing is gained by
On 12 Jun 2011, at 00:51, Pat Hayes wrote:
Well, I am sympathetic to not defending HTTP-range-14 and nobody ever, ever
again even mentioning information resource, but I don't think we can just
make this go away by ignoring it. What do we say when a URI is used both to
retrieve, um sorry,
On 12 Jun 2011, at 11:12, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
I've yet to encounter a person who didn't understand the difference between a
book about Obama and Obama.
This has nothing to do with books about Obama.
It's about the difference between an URI-named resource which can return, say,
a JSON
On 11 Jun 2011, at 21:21, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
will you be posting this as a FAQ i think its definitely worth it.
Good idea, thanks. Some of the answers are now here:
http://schema.rdfs.org/faq.html
Richard
Gio
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.de
On 12 Jun 2011, at 18:34, Pat Hayes wrote:
What do we say when the range of a property is supposed to be, say, people,
but its considered OK to insert a string to stand in place of the person?
Well, I can define a class that contains both people (in the foaf:Person
sense) and names of
All,
Thanks for the thoughtful feedback regarding schema.rdfs.org, both here and
off-list.
This is a collective response to various arguments brought up. I'll paraphrase
the arguments.
Limiting ranges of properties to strings is bad because we LD people might
want to use URIs or blank
Alan,
Always a pleasure to hear from you.
On 11 Jun 2011, at 18:55, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
There already exists such a type that is a W3C recommendation. It is
called rdf:PlainLiteral - see http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-plain-literal/
I'm not sure why RDF 1.1 working group is not aware of that.
On 9 Jun 2011, at 22:02, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
We're currently rolling out the live-sync to Schema.org along with some other
improvements - there is a lot to do and if you want to contribute via the
repo, you're more than welcome.
http://schema.rdfs.org/ now also offers a CSV download of
On 19 May 2011, at 14:03, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
Current tools, i.e. the ecosystem in which we expect broad adoption of SW
technology, is not just a temporary, minor obstacle;
it is likely THE most important aspect our technical proposals must fit to.
This view is incredibly short sighted,
Hi all,
We have just released version 0.5.1 of Neologism, a web-based vocabulary editor
and publishing platform for RDF Schema vocabularies.
It's been a while since Neologism was last mentioned on this list. Over the
last two years, we have gone through a long process of slowly improving and
On 28 Apr 2011, at 11:26, Leigh Dodds wrote:
However it may be useful to define a standard response format and
potentially error messages to help client apps/users distinguish
between more fine-grained error states. I suggested this during
discussion of the original protocol specification but
Hi Samur,
The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative has some instance matching
datasets in their 2010 benchmarks. These are known as IM@OAEI2010. We used them
to evaluate a number of instance matching approaches in this paper:
“Re-using Cool URIs: Entity Reconciliation Against LOD Hubs”
(catching up)
On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:54, Hugh Glaser wrote:
1. xsd:string in RDF must die. It's one of those completely and utterly
useless pieces of rubbish that litter the RDF specs.
Perhaps you could tell us what you really think :-)
2. If you publish in multiple languages, then
On 1 Apr 2011, at 13:32, John Goodwin wrote:
Thank you for this - very useful. Also very timely as OS are about to release
all raster mapping products in RDF.
That's about time! I want to use SPARQL CONSTRUCT for image processing.
Best,
Richard
John
-Original Message-
From:
On 1 Apr 2011, at 11:14, Markus Luczak-Rösch wrote:
If endpoints deliver no content to the client e.g. if
the client performs a SPARQL query that yields no results, servers answer
HTTP status code 200 and deliver some content that holds the information
that there were no results. As far as I
Ian,
On 1 Apr 2011, at 13:42, Ian Davis wrote:
I really don't see why I should have to reengineer my entire toolchain simply
to consume your proprietary format. It is well known that the standard for
information interchange is the Microsoft Word 97 document format which is
easily read by
On 1 Apr 2011, at 14:27, Monika Solanki wrote:
Excellent initiative! Hopefully you will get many followers and
hopefully we get to see the LPD (Linked PDF data) cloud by 1st April
2012 :-) . This will hopefully replace the current LOD.
Taking advantage of one of PDF's many advantages, we plan
://graphite.ecs.soton.ac.uk/img2rdf/
Example output: http://is.gd/3h0Ais
I've limited it to 10K pixels for now. Code available on request.
Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 1 Apr 2011, at 13:32, John Goodwin wrote:
Thank you for this - very useful. Also very timely as OS are about
On 21 Mar 2011, at 13:05, Hugh Glaser wrote:
So I guess I need to do four patterns just to find all the exact World Wide
Web Consortium English phrases (with and without @en and with and without
datatype string).
Is that really right?
Three -- you can't have both a datatype and a language
Hugh,
There's
http://dbpedia.org/sparql
which as you noticed doesn't show language tags.
Then there's
http://dbpedia.org/snorql
which does it right.
Best,
Richard
On 21 Mar 2011, at 11:08, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Thanks guys.
Sigh - not that one again.
The problem was I hadn't noticed I was
Hi Danny,
I helped set up the Factbook SPARQL endpoint in 2007 when I was still in
Berlin. The service was set up as a demo for D2R Server and its new linked data
capabilities. AFAIK it's been just sitting there ever since, and the data
probably has never been updated.
The error message looks
On 14 Mar 2011, at 09:15, Bob Ferris wrote:
2. The selection of ontologies listed is, to say the best, often biased or
partly a random choice. I do not know any repository that
- lists more non-toy ontologies than abandoned PhD project prototypes.
I don't want to take a concrete position
Bob,
On 14 Mar 2011, at 10:47, Bob Ferris wrote:
Am 14.03.2011 11:13, schrieb Richard Cyganiak:
The abandoned PhD project type of ontology or vocabulary has no community
around it. Therefore, one gains very little by re-using it.
...
I can only repeat myself: PhD-project-born ontologies have
On 6 Mar 2011, at 12:16, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
Talk of how many triples are in a store puts me in mind of this quote
Measuring programming progress by lines of code is like measuring
aircraft building progress by weight.
Well, but you know that quality on the Web of Data is
Pierre-Yves, Peter,
On 2 Mar 2011, at 16:59, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche wrote:
If someone from CKAN could answer these questions:
Is it normal in CKAN to have more than one endpoint ? (I think so)
No, http://ckan.net/package/geospecies is the only CKAN record where two
endpoints were entered.
Great work Pierre-Yves!
Good to see that the CKAN directory is useful for something besides drawing
pretty cloud pictures ;-)
The logo is genius.
Currently it seems that you get a red light for 75% uptime. 75% uptime sucks,
but it is still very different from 0% uptime, which probably means
is gone permanently. I think it
would be good to capture that in the choice of color.
Best,
Richard
May be I should put my legend at table's top.
Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.de wrote:
Great work Pierre-Yves!
Good to see
and Computer Science | University of Southampton |
Southampton, SO17 1BJ | United Kingdom | Phone: +44 23 8059 4059
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Richard Cyganiak
rich...@cyganiak.de wrote:
On 10 Oct 2010, at 23:12, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Actually, the only rkbexplorer.com endpoint that uses
this information in my
head somehow morphed into 4store. Sorry for any confusion I caused.
Richard
On 01/10/2010 13:08, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.de wrote:
Yesterday I pulled a list of all SPARQL endpoints in the LOD Cloud
diagram from the CKAN API. There are 141. After removing 24 that were
On 1 Oct 2010, at 15:02, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
From what I've seen, at any given time 10-20% of the LOD Cloud
SPARQL endpoints seem to be down ...
Yes, we are planning a cloud driven by a database that stores no/off
status data culled from probes. Thus, when released you will have
data
to be down ...
Best,
Richard
Cheers,
y
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Jens Lehmann
lehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
Hello,
On 01.10.2010 14:08, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
The real news here is that we now have more than 100 live SPARQL
endpoints in the Cloud. I'm not going
, at any given time 10-20% of the LOD Cloud SPARQL
endpoints seem to be down ...
Best,
Richard
Cheers,
y
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Jens Lehmann
lehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
Hello,
On 01.10.2010 14:08, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
The real news here is that we now have more
Sounds like it might be an instance of this problem:
http://www.semanticoverflow.com/questions/947/dbpedia-sparql-endpoint-xsddate-comparison-weirdness
If not, then perhaps asking this on the DBpedia mailing list might get
better responses.
On 24 Sep 2010, at 20:56, John Erickson wrote:
Didn't one of the original color-enhanced versions of the LOD Cloud
highlight by license?
Leigh Dodds did that version, it's in his slides here:
http://www.ldodds.com/tmp/iswc-legal-frameworks-overview.pdf
The results were not encouraging back
On 22 Sep 2010, at 20:41, Egon Willighagen wrote:
Now that you build from CKAN, are you going to update the plot more
often?
Hopefully, yes. That was a large part of the motivation for moving
data management into CKAN -- make the whole process more scalable, so
that we can do it more
Peter,
On 17 Sep 2010, at 20:48, Peter DeVries wrote:
I created the SPARQL query below for the TaxonConcept Knowledge Base.
It is based on the earlier one posted by Richard Cyganiak.
I looked through my RDF for predicates that have in and out links to
other
data sets.
It is not clear
Peter,
On 9 Sep 2010, at 02:54, Peter DeVries wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has figured out a way to generate the LOD
interlinking (InLinks/OutLinks) stats from a Virtuoso OpenSource
SPARQL
Endpoint.
I used this one here a lot. It makes use of Viruoso's awesome built-in
function
Hi Yves,
[trimmed cc list]
On 2 Jul 2010, at 11:15, Yves Raimond wrote:
I am not arguing for each vendor to implement that. I am arguing for
removing this arbitrary limitation from the RDF spec. Also marked as
an issue since 2000:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literalsubjects
Hi Benjamin,
On 2 Jul 2010, at 11:01, Benjamin Nowack wrote:
Our problem is not lack of features (native literal subjects? c'mon!).
It is identifying the individual user stories in our broad community
and marketing respective solution bundles. The RDFa and LOD folks
have demonstrated that this
On 1 Jun 2010, at 19:37, Bernhard Schandl wrote:
I want to throw in another question, are there currently arguments
for or against the two alternatives:
http://www.example.org/doc/alice.html
vs
http://www.example.org/doc/html/alice
and the same for .rdf vs rdf/
In terms of web
Hi Angelo,
On 31 May 2010, at 10:32, Angelo Veltens wrote:
DBpedia has copied the approach from D2R Server. The person who
came up with it and designed and implemented it for D2R Server is
me. This was back in 2006, before the term Linked Data was even
coined, so I didn't exactly have a
On 27 May 2010, at 10:47, Angelo Veltens wrote:
What I am going to implement is this: http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/#r303uri
I think, this is the way dbpedia works and it seems a good solution
for me.
It's the way DBpedia works, but it's by far the worst solution of the
three presented in
On 20 May 2010, at 10:49, Angelo Veltens wrote:
I am just looking for a framework to do content negotiation in java.
There's a reasonably stable and well-tested implementation that is
used both in the Pubby and D2R Server codebases. See here:
On 20 May 2010, at 13:38, Angelo Veltens wrote:
I might have a non-information resource http://example.org/resource/
foo
I could place a REST-Webservice there and do content negotiation
with @GET / @Produces Annotations. But this seems not correct to me,
because it is a non-information
Hi Kingsley,
Regarding your blog post at
http://www.openlinksw.com/dataspace/kide...@openlinksw.com/weblog/kide...@openlinksw.com%27s%20blog%20%5b127%5d/1624
Great job -- I like it a lot, it's not as fuzzy as Tim's four
principles, not as mired in detail as most of the concrete literature
Niklas,
On 13 Apr 2010, at 10:06, Niklas Lindström wrote:
I'd like to point you to a vocabulary I've made for describing how to
mint (or validate) URI:s from RDF properties of a resource: CoIN -
Composition of Identifier Names [1].
Nice. Creating URIs from descriptions of resources is a
Hi Robert,
On 13 Apr 2010, at 17:11, Robert Sanderson wrote:
I've found it very valuable to formally declare the pieces from which
an URI is to be composed of. Especially in our environment where we
have a central design of the URI:s, but decentralized publishing of
data (which is of a somewhat
On 13 Apr 2010, at 18:04, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
2/ Given a URI, a software should not try to reverse-engineer it.
However, the axiom does not prevent that a software be given a
*rule* to
*produce* new URIs.
As a matter of fact, I would be surprised that TBL would discourage
this
On 7 Apr 2010, at 14:35, Hugh Glaser wrote:
On 07/04/2010 14:02, Vasiliy Faronov vfaro...@gmail.com wrote:
Dan Brickley wrote:
This is where the delicate tradeoffs come into play, and where we
would all benefit if there were conventions for documenting the
information needs (eg. SPARQL
Hi Hugh,
Thinking more about this, I'm resetting to the start of the thread and
I have a question for you.
The Cool URIs for the Semantic Web document, which is perhaps the
canonical reference for the 303/conneg style of linked data
publishing, lists two different design patterns for
are not
reason enough to mess with the web infrastructure.
Best,
Richard
Thank you all for all your helpful discussions.
I anticipate the next round eagerly.
Hugh
On 24/03/2010 17:16, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.de wrote:
Hi Ted,
On 24 Mar 2010, at 15:31, Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote:
If I ask
Hugh,
On 23 Mar 2010, at 22:50, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Assuming that we are in the usual situation of http://foo/bar doing
a 303 to
http://foo/bar.rdf when it gets a Accept: application/rdf+xml http://foo/bar
what should a server do when it gets a request for
Accept: application/rdf+xml
Hi Ted,
On 24 Mar 2010, at 15:31, Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote:
If I ask for application/rdf+xml representation of http://foo/
bar.html,
you *SHOULD NOT* 200 OK and give me text/html *unless* you are also
and
simultaneously providing a list of other alternatives (not formatted
here as it would be
On 20 Mar 2010, at 15:32, Vasiliy Faronov wrote:
I have a related question, about describing negotiated documents in
RDF.
Suppose there's a web resource http://example.org/ which has the
following representations:
- HTML in English, also available at http://example.org/
index.en.html
- HTML
On 11 Mar 2010, at 20:34, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
Is it correct that all representations must have consistent fragment
identifiers in order to be considered equivalent?
A fragment identifier should not identify different things in
different
representations. (Though it may be
Hi Nathan,
On 12 Mar 2010, at 14:00, Nathan wrote:
Last question(s) related to fragments.. if I have:
http://example.org/something
http://example.org/something#a
Those are two unique URIs and thus two unique resources (?)
Yes.
And the semantics of a fragment means that
Hi Nathan,
On 12 Mar 2010, at 16:46, Nathan wrote:
Then if I delete a Primary resource, the secondary resources must
also
be deleted, true / false (?).
The web is about representations of information resources. If you add
RDF to the picture, then it's also about descriptions of arbitrary
Jiri,
On 22 Feb 2010, at 10:51, Jiří Procházka wrote:
I wonder if we as a group of people
interested in Semantic Web could come up with etiquette for ontology
mapping.
Interesting topic! My €0.02: If the other vocabulary is likely to be
- more stable
- more mature
- more likely to be widely
On 22 Feb 2010, at 19:36, Jiří Procházka wrote:
I wonder if we as a group of people
interested in Semantic Web could come up with etiquette for ontology
mapping.
Interesting topic! My €0.02: If the other vocabulary is likely to
be
- more stable
- more mature
- more likely to be widely used
On 10 Feb 2010, at 19:26, Nathan wrote:
From the client's POV, what's the difference between receiving a
406 (“I
don't have a format that you understand”) and a 200 with a non-
supported
Content-Type (“Here, take a look at this thing in a format that you
don't understand”)?
Ambiguity? a 4xx
On 10 Feb 2010, at 11:03, Christoph LANGE wrote:
Of course any reasonable approach to pick the most relevant
triples
depends on the specific vocabulary and application, but still, are
there
any guidelines? Or should we rather consider ways of mapping hash
URIs to
slash URIs? Are there
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
