/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)
--
Steve Harris
Experian
+44 20 3042 4132
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL
On 2013-07-04, at 17:12, Steve Harris steve.har...@garlik.com wrote:
Of course you have to handle the case where http://foo.example/ and
https://foo.example/ are materially different too…
Actually, have to is wrong, may want to be able to is more true.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris
Experian
+44
not web native. It's total gibberish.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris
Experian
+44 20 3042 4132
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL
for that subject
where something is unknown - as others have said.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris
Experian
+44 20 3042 4132
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JL
variables — Manuel Salvadores
* Better static build tools — Nicholas Humfrey
--
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
+44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Hi Dave,
On 2012-05-17, at 16:56, David Wood wrote:
Hi Steve,
On May 17, 2012, at 11:18, Steve Harris wrote:
On 2012-05-16, at 23:09, David Wood wrote:
Still, Kingsley is right, too. We are certainly busier than we have ever
been, with no clear end in sight. That's positive
to know if I knew what the right problems
where though.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way
--
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
--
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, NG2 Business Park, Nottingham,
Nottinghamshire, England
.
Best wishes
Martin Hepp
--
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
with the state of the art in friendly
crawling.
Best wishes
Martin Hepp
--
Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248
You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
--
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road
. Good luck
everyone!
cheers,
harry
P.S.: Note this opinions are purely personal and held as an individual.
--
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535
.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
developer 2) CEO 3) VC investors 4) my
parents.
I do 1-3 about weekly. It's hard work, but far from impossible. I'll
leave 4 up to you :)
- Steve
--
Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales
On 10 Jul 2009, at 15:36, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Steve Harris wrote:
On 10 Jul 2009, at 14:31, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Steve et. al,
If we are going to take the how the Web was born theme re.
figuring out the path forward, then what's wrong with RDFa? If
people sort of know how to write
popular with people (like me) who just wanted to
bash out some text in vi.
/
- Steve
--
Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House
readable by humans) could be quite hacker-friendly. I've been meaning
to look into this.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames
Alternatively you could put that data in a RDF store, and just serve
up the fragments using a wrapped CONSTRUCT query.
That's what we do for qdos.com, eg
http://qdos.com/user/Steve-Harris/18b6f60b41e05aaa418565ebfe901d6b/rdfxml
and it's pretty efficient, more efficient that storing 1000
thousands of copies of an (almost?) identical document. But with no
obvious clue that they're the same.
I didn't look at what was going on in the HTTP, but using the right
40x forwards it could make it clear to the client what's happening.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen
at the server side. It's something I addressed in the last
academic (reasoning) store I built, but I don't think there's any
consensus on how you handle, or represent that information.
- Steve
--
Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com
On 21 Aug 2008, at 16:51, Axel Polleres wrote:
Tackling the question from the more theoretical side,
I like non-monotonic SPARQL queries like the ones modeling set
difference.
E.g.
Give me all persons *without* an email address in a certain FOAF
graph.
i) It is already folklore, that
21 matches
Mail list logo