Hi John,
On 09.01.2015 14:08, John Walker wrote:
On January 9, 2015 at 1:15 PM Steffen Lohmann
steffen.lohm...@vis.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
On 09.01.2015 11:59, John Walker wrote:
I see under Selection Details that there is a count of instances
when a class is selected.
Is there any option
On 05.01.2015 16:29, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
This is great stuff!
Thank you, Stian. We are glad to hear that.
I tried it with my ontology PAV - and it seems it is struggling a bit
because PAV (deliberately) don't have a defined domain and range on
object properties:
Hi Steffen,
I see under Selection Details that there is a count of instances when a class is
selected.
Is there any option to show other otherwise enumerate the instances of a class?
Maybe showing the instances in the graph might clutter things up (could add a
filter for this), but simply adding
Hi John,
On 09.01.2015 11:59, John Walker wrote:
I see under Selection Details that there is a count of instances when
a class is selected.
Is there any option to show other otherwise enumerate the instances of
a class?
Maybe showing the instances in the graph might clutter things up
(could
Hi Steffen,
On January 9, 2015 at 1:15 PM Steffen Lohmann
steffen.lohm...@vis.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
Hi John,
On 09.01.2015 11:59, John Walker wrote:
I see under Selection Details that there is a count of instances when
a class is selected.
Is there any
This is great stuff!
I tried it with my ontology PAV - and it seems it is struggling a bit
because PAV (deliberately) don't have a defined domain and range on
object properties:
http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://purl.org/pav/
Hence everything goes from and to Thing in the
Thank you, Colin. I am glad to hear that. Your RDFS ontology looks
indeed quite nice in WebVOWL.
Have fun with it,
Steffen
--
On 22.12.2014 13:48, Colin Maudry wrote:
Great job!
I'm particularly happy because it shows good support for an RDFS
ontology
Kingsley, Timothy, Sarven, Melvin, Ali,
On 22.12.2014 16:20, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
I just want the URI of the current node in the graph to be a live link
i.e., an exit point from the visualization tool to the actual source.
You offer something close to this in the side panel, but its scoped
On 12/23/14 11:37 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
Kingsley, Timothy, Sarven, Melvin, Ali,
On 22.12.2014 16:20, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
I just want the URI of the current node in the graph to be a live
link i.e., an exit point from the visualization tool to the actual
source. You offer something
Thanks for a fun tool and for listening to our criticisms.
Have a relaxing holiday.
--Tim
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Steffen Lohmann
steffen.lohm...@vis.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
Kingsley, Timothy, Sarven, Melvin, Ali,
On 22.12.2014 16:20, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
I just want the URI
Great job!
I'm particularly happy because it shows good support for an RDFS
ontology
(http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://purl.org/dita/ns).
Lately I see new tools that mostly support OWL ontologies, so thanks a lot!
Colin Maudry
@CMaudry
On 22-Dec-14 13:04, Steffen Lohmann
On 12/22/14 7:04 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
Kingsley, Alfredo, Timothy, Melvin,
thank you for your comments and ideas.
On 19.12.2014 17:57, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
do you have a permalink feature that makes any visualization doc
shareable via HTTP URLs ?
Yes, we have (as already indicated
On 2014-12-22 13:04, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
On 21.12.2014 04:11, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
I would normally expect a ? in the query string however, rather than,
# which I presume is the 1337 way to hide the ontology from the server.
Good point. We discuss it and maybe change to the query
On 23 December 2014 at 00:17, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote:
On 2014-12-22 13:04, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
On 21.12.2014 04:11, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
I would normally expect a ? in the query string however, rather than,
# which I presume is the 1337 way to hide the ontology from
On 12/20/14 10:11 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
On 19 December 2014 at 17:57, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 12/19/14 10:49 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
Hi all,
we are glad to announce the release of WebVOWL 0.3, which
great work, I like it! :-)
any plans for integrating individuals visualization?
2014-12-19 17:57 GMT+01:00 Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com:
On 12/19/14 10:49 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
Hi all,
we are glad to announce the release of WebVOWL 0.3, which integrates our
OWL2VOWL
Great job! Clearly when it rains, it pours!
Lot's of great Linked Data visualizations are now popping up everywhere,
just what we all needed.
hi kingsley
which other are you referring to? (i likely have missed them)
thanks
Gio
On 12/20/14 9:43 AM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
Great job! Clearly when it rains, it pours!
Lot's of great Linked Data visualizations are now popping up
everywhere, just what we all needed.
hi kingsley
which other are you referring to? (i likely have missed them)
thanks
Gio
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Alfredo Serafini ser...@gmail.com wrote:
great work, I like it! :-)
+1
any plans for integrating individuals visualization?
That would be nice.
Since we are asking for features. ;-)
It would be great to see meta data such as dc:description when
On 19 December 2014 at 17:57, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
On 12/19/14 10:49 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
Hi all,
we are glad to announce the release of WebVOWL 0.3, which integrates our
OWL2VOWL converter now. WebVOWL works in modern web browsers without any
installation so
Hi all,
we are glad to announce the release of WebVOWL 0.3, which integrates our
OWL2VOWL converter now. WebVOWL works in modern web browsers without any
installation so that ontologies can be instantly visualized. Check it
out at: http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl.html
To the best of
On 12/19/14 10:49 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
Hi all,
we are glad to announce the release of WebVOWL 0.3, which integrates
our OWL2VOWL converter now. WebVOWL works in modern web browsers
without any installation so that ontologies can be instantly
visualized. Check it out at:
22 matches
Mail list logo
