Hi Hugh and all
... skipping Kingsley-related stuff :)
This is an interest to me because there is a whole load of other
stuff that
appears under the dbpedia banner, mostly concerned with sameAs with other
resources (some of which I disagree with).
Pat Hayes and Harry Halpin have a
On 31 March 2010 05:40, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
I think that dbpedia (all praise to its amazing achievement) should
restrict
itself to publishing exactly and only what it has gleaned from wikipedia,
and any other stuff should be published elsewhere.
IMHO exactly and
Hugh Glaser wrote:
If it warrants it, why not create a wikipedia page about the semantic
web community giving information; then rdf the same - describe it.. then
you get the uri and can map it (and other groups) to foaf:Group.
?
[snip]
Couple of almost-independent points -
Re DBpedia, I share a concern that the Wikipedia turned into a
database product remain fairly clearly defined, even though the
RDFization naturally includes a bit of creativity. However even that
has subtleties - there are the different language
Hi danbri,
[snip]
Also re SWIG, considered as a entity in the W3C world and as a larger
vaguer community. Some W3C Interest Groups have enumerated
memberships; traditionally RDF IG and its successor, this SemWeb IG,
didn't. There is no master list, just a collection of SWIG-related
mailing
Hi all hi Tom,
Does the Semantic Web Interest Group (or the Linked Data community),
as a foaf:Group or something equivalent, has a WebID(URI)? Sorry but I
didn't check whether this has been brought up.
If it doesn't, I would certainly hope that it does have one. I think
the best choice
On 26 Mar 2010, at 15:22, KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
Hi all hi Tom,
Does the Semantic Web Interest Group (or the Linked Data community), as a
foaf:Group or something equivalent, has a WebID(URI)? Sorry but I didn't
check whether this has been brought up.
If it doesn't, I would
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
Hi all hi Tom,
Does the Semantic Web Interest Group (or the Linked Data community),
as a foaf:Group or something equivalent, has a WebID(URI)? Sorry but I
didn't check whether this has been brought up.
If it doesn't, I would certainly hope that it does have one. I
Story Henry wrote:
On 26 Mar 2010, at 15:22, KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
Hi all hi Tom,
Does the Semantic Web Interest Group (or the Linked Data community), as a
foaf:Group or something equivalent, has a WebID(URI)? Sorry but I didn't check
whether this has been brought up.
If it
On 2010/03/27, at 0:27, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Kenny,
This URI is inaccurate re. DBpedia developers:
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/is-group/page/projects/Project13
To be precise:
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/is-group/page/projects/Project13
is one of the teams that works on extraction
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
On 2010/03/27, at 0:27, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Kenny,
This URI is inaccurate re. DBpedia developers:
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/is-group/page/projects/Project13
To be precise:
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/is-group/page/projects/Project13 is
one of the
On 26 March 2010 15:27, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hmm, there once was an instance of Virtuoso+ODS at:
http://community.linkeddata.org/ods that actually gave all members of
LOD a URI. All you have to do is walk through the LOD mail archives to
see how it came to an end. Tom
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
[SNIP]
The point is we don't want machine generated URIs (sorry I can't see
what's inside http://community.linkeddata.org/ods cause it's down
for the moment). We should have triples like
Please note, I was trying to tell you that there once lived a Linked
Data
2010/3/26 KangHao Lu (Kenny) kennyl...@csail.mit.edu
Hi all hi Tom,
Does the Semantic Web Interest Group (or the Linked Data community), as a
foaf:Group or something equivalent, has a WebID(URI)? Sorry but I didn't
check whether this has been brought up.
If it doesn't, I would certainly
Tom Heath wrote:
On 26 March 2010 15:27, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hmm, there once was an instance of Virtuoso+ODS at:
http://community.linkeddata.org/ods that actually gave all members of
LOD a URI. All you have to do is walk through the LOD mail archives to
see how it
On 26 Mar 2010, at 18:59, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
This is how it works:
1. New Users open accounts
2. Edit profile
3. Click a button that makes an X.509 certificate, exports to browser, and
writes to FOAF space
4. Member visits any FOAF+SSL or OpenID space on the Web and never has to
Story Henry wrote:
On 26 Mar 2010, at 18:59, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
This is how it works:
1. New Users open accounts
2. Edit profile
3. Click a button that makes an X.509 certificate, exports to browser, and
writes to FOAF space
4. Member visits any FOAF+SSL or OpenID space on the Web and
Kingsley,
My recollection of events is as follows:
1. A number of us (you, me, others - don't remember exactly who)
agreed that the community.linkeddata.org site was a good idea.
2. You set up an ODS instance running in EC2 and asked me to setup the
appropriate CNAME record in the DNS.
3. I set
Story Henry wrote:
On 26 Mar 2010, at 18:59, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
This is how it works:
1. New Users open accounts
2. Edit profile
3. Click a button that makes an X.509 certificate, exports to browser, and
writes to FOAF space
4. Member visits any FOAF+SSL or OpenID space on the Web and
Tom Heath wrote:
Kingsley,
My recollection of events is as follows:
1. A number of us (you, me, others - don't remember exactly who)
agreed that the community.linkeddata.org site was a good idea.
Yes.
2. You set up an ODS instance running in EC2 and asked me to setup the
appropriate CNAME
I have changed the subject, as things seem to be fragmenting, and this is my
interpretation of one of the fragments.
Please correct me if this is a wrong understanding:
Part of his complaint is that Kingsley has complained that dbpedia is
publishing some stuff that he disagrees with.
As far as I
21 matches
Mail list logo
