On 28.4.2014 18:23, Luca Matteis wrote:
The current Linked Data principles rely on specific standards and
protocols such as HTTP, URIs and RDF/SPARQL. Because I think it's
healthy to look at things from a different prospective, I was
wondering whether the same idea of a global interlinked
On 28 April 2014 17:23, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
The current Linked Data principles rely on specific standards and
protocols such as HTTP, URIs and RDF/SPARQL. Because I think it's
healthy to look at things from a different prospective, I was
wondering whether the same idea of a
I think also RDF is not so inflexible as people think it is.
For me the 'atom' of RDF is not the triple, but the node. In the
node you get the global namespace of IRIs and you also get the
richness of the xsd data types, and plus the ability to define your
own data types. There's a pretty
Thanks John but not really.
I was specifically looking for research that wasn't based on protocols
such as HTTP, URIs and RDF. But that is still in the field of
achieving a global interconnected database.
I know webby standards are implemented so no need to reinvent the
wheel, but I think it's
On 4/28/14 11:55 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
Thanks John but not really.
I was specifically looking for research that wasn't based on protocols
such as HTTP, URIs and RDF. But that is still in the field of
achieving a global interconnected database.
I'll try:
de-referencing an identifier en
Something like doing Linked Data over P2P networks, that is, using distributed
hash tables?
You might like to have a look at some of that research (you can probably google
better than I can).
It weakens the provenance etc of the DNS angle, but of course then enables
others to publish Linked
Hi,
Kingsley - Your response was clear, concise well put -- Thanks. For people
familiar with RDBMS wanting to better understand what makes a linked data
approach useful, that was a great comparison.
Luca - Sure, data has a wide range of mechanisms in which it can be modeled
and presented.
Hi Luca All,
There is a different approach to unifying data from diverse sources.
It's described by means of an example in
www.reengineeringllc.com/EnergyIndependence1.pdf
www.reengineeringllc.com/EnergyIndependence1Video.htm
The basic insight is to look beyond data and metadata, and
Luca, using the existing standards is like agreeing to speak the same language
as everyone else. So to illustrate the point, I will give the rest of this
reply in Klingon rather than English.
lang nIv'e' motlh yIlo' interoperability 'oHbe' 'e' chaH nIv 'op qIt latlhpu'.
'oH DaSovrup mojpu'
