Hi Ashok and thanks for the link. Indeed, it is too heavyweight, though if
I'm not mistaken, it was the basis for the AIR Web Rule Language (
http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2009/AIR/). We will discuss everything once we get
started.
Best,
Andrei
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Ashok Malhotra
on an official Web Access Control spec.
Dear all,
For those of you who know me, please skip this paragraph. For the others, I
would first like to introduce myself. My name is Andrei Sambra and for the past
three years I have been involved in different W3C groups, such as WebID, LDP
and RWW (co
Hello again,
Thank you all for expressing your interest. I would like to keep this
thread open for a few more days, to get an estimate of how many people are
interested in participating. Until then, please familiarize yourselves with
the WAC ontology (in case you haven't already), and maybe
Look also at the work on a Policy Aware Web, for example:
http://www.w3.org/2004/09/Policy-Aware-Web-acl.pdf
I think this approach is too heavyweight but we can discuss.
All the best, Ashok
On 10/19/2013 4:26 AM, Andrei Sambra wrote:
Hello again,
Thank you all for expressing your interest. I
Hi Andrei,
I am interested in participating. I've been looking to add WAC to
VIVO to work with the WebID4VIVO that we have created to allow
inter-VIVO operations. -- Erich
Erich Bremer
http://www.ebremer.com
On 10/17/13 9:05 AM, Andrei Sambra wrote:
Dear all,
For those of you who
Dear all,
For those of you who know me, please skip this paragraph. For the others, I
would first like to introduce myself. My name is Andrei Sambra and for the
past three years I have been involved in different W3C groups, such as
WebID, LDP and RWW (co-chair). As an advocate of Semantic Web
On 17 October 2013 15:05, Andrei Sambra andrei.sam...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
For those of you who know me, please skip this paragraph. For the others,
I would first like to introduce myself. My name is Andrei Sambra and for
the past three years I have been involved in different W3C
I'm checking internally what we might be able to offer. Off the top of
my head I wouldn't discount being able to use Zakim as well as the tracker.
This is clearly an interesting and important subject and we have it on
the radar so I'll watch how this discussion evolves with keen interest.
Hi Andrei,
Thanks for bringing this up. I myself have implemented the Web
Access Control spec Scala in the application
https://github.com/stample/rww-play
I will hopfully be putting a server online in the next month running that
code for people to try out. The WebAccessControl
On 17 Oct 2013, at 15:09, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd been interested in this topic for many years, and would love to help out.
Actually each community group does have access to a W3C issue tracker:
http://www.w3.org/community/rww/track/
Telcons I'm not sure
Hi Andrei:
I have been pushing Web Access Control with various parties for a couple of
years now.
At the last LDP f2f there was a suggestion that we hold a workshop or take some
time
on the upcoming Web Security workshop. But we need a position and, at least,
the start
of a design.
Please
Thanks again for raising this, Andrei.
I know you've been doing a lot of work on this at MIT and from what you
and others have said it's clear that there's a lot of work in the public
domain. Good. The road from there to an actual standard is though still
quite steep I'm afraid.
The W3C
Hi Phil and thank you for your feedback!
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Phil Archer ph...@w3.org wrote:
Thanks again for raising this, Andrei.
I know you've been doing a lot of work on this at MIT and from what you
and others have said it's clear that there's a lot of work in the public
Andrei,
I would be interested. I have worked on ACL a lot recently, with a
goal to produce a transparent JAX-RS authorization filter for our
Graphity platform: http://graphity.org.
I have successfully implemented the filter using W3C ACL ontology and
plain SPARQL 1.1, but the code is
14 matches
Mail list logo
